SavedAdd your journal

Journals / CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1

Investigation of 30 Meter Sprint Performances with and without Finish Line in Athletes in Terms of Personality Traits

Sporcularda Bitiş Çizgisi Olan ve Olmayan 30 Metre Sprint Performanslarının Kişilik Özelliklerine Göre İncelenmesi

Mihri Barış Karavelioğlu(KÜTAHYA DUMLUPINAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3536-2485
Gizem Başkaya(BANDIRMA ONYEDİ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6001-1727
Serkan Aydın(NAMIK KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3618-8028
Pages
311–323
Publication Date
2023-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it can be stated that the participants with high agreeabeleness sub-dimension had a higher tendency to comply with the suggestions, while the participants with high responsibility sub-dimension had a lower tendency to comply with the suggestions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate 30-metre sprint performances of athletes with and without finish line in terms of personality traits.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 61 male athletes with an age, height and body weight mean of 19.98±1.52 years, 173.16±.007 cm and 65.49±10.06 kg, respectively, voluntarily participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it can be stated that the participants with high agreeabeleness sub-dimension had a higher tendency to comply with the suggestions, while the participants with high responsibility sub-dimension had a lower tendency to comply with the suggestions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sporcu · Kişilik · Performans

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate 30-metre sprint performances of athletes with and without finish line in terms of personality traits. A total of 61 male athletes with an age, height and body weight mean of 19.98±1.52 years, 173.16±.007 cm and 65.49±10.06 kg, respectively, voluntarily participated in the study. In order to achieve this aim, personality traits of athletes in different branches and 30-metre sprint values were measured twice. The first 30-metre sprint values were taken by suggesting "Think that the finish line is further ahead and do not decrease your speed when you approach the finish line". In the second 30-metre sprint, no suggestion was made to the athletes and the participants were asked to perform. After the measurements, running performances with and without a clear finish line were compared according to personality traits. Therefore, the effect of personality traits on compliance with suggestions and result-orientated behaviour in athletes was revealed. The "Ten-Item Personality Scale" developed by Gosling, et al. (2003) and adapted into Turkish by Atak (2013) was used to determine the personality characteristics of the participants. The 30-metre sprint values with and without the finish line were measured using a photocell. Statistical data were analysed with STATA 13 version. Structural Equation Modelling and Poisson Logistic Regression Analysis were applied to determine the relationship between the groups. As a result of the analyses, it was determined that the athletes with higher " agreeabeleness " sub-dimension had better 30-meter sprint values with the finish line and the athletes with higher "responsibility" sub-dimension had better 30-meter sprint values without the finish line. As a result, it can be stated that the participants with high agreeabeleness sub-dimension had a higher tendency to comply with the suggestions, while the participants with high responsibility sub-dimension had a lower tendency to comply with the suggestions.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı sporcularda bitiş çizgisi olan ve olmayan 30 metre sprint performanslarının kişilik özelliklerine göre incelenmesidir. Çalışmaya yaş, boy uzunluğu ve vücut ağırlığı ortalamaları sırasıyla 19.98±1.52 yıl, 173.16±.007 cm ve 65.49±10.06 kg olan toplam 61 erkek sporcu gönüllü olarak katıldı. Bu amaca ulaşmak için sporcuların kişilik özellikleri ve 30 metre sprint değerleri iki kez ölçüldü. İlk 30 metre sprint değerleri “Bitiş çizgisinin daha ileride olduğunu düşünün ve bitiş çizgisine yaklaştığınızda hızınızı düşürmeyin.” telkininde bulunularak alındı. İkinci 30 metre sprint değerleri alınırken ise, sporculara hiçbir telkinde bulunulmadı. Ölçümler sonrasında bitiş çizgisi belli olan ve olmayan koşu performansları kişilik özelliklerine göre karşılaştırıldı. Dolayısıyla sporcularda kişilik özelliklerinin telkinlere uymada ve sonuca yönelik hareket etmedeki etkisi ortaya kondu. Katılımcıların kişilik özelliklerini belirlemek için Gosling ve arkadaşları (2003) tarafından geliştirilen ve Atak (2013) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan “On-Madde Kişilik Ölçeği" kullanıldı. Bitiş çizgisi olan ve olmayan 30 metre sprint değerleri ise, fotosel kullanılarak ölçüldü. İstatistiksel veriler STATA 13 versiyon ile analiz edildi. Gruplar arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek için Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (Structural Equation Modeling) ve Poisson Lojistik Regresyon Analizi uygulandı. Analizler sonucunda “yumuşak başlılık” alt boyutu yüksek olan sporcuların bitiş çizgisinin olduğu 30 metre sprint değerlerinin; “sorumluluk” alt boyutu yüksek olan sporcuların ise, bitiş çizgisinin olmadığı 30 metre sprint değerlerinin daha iyi olduğu tespit edildi. Sonuç olarak, yumuşak başlılık alt boyutu yüksek olan katılımcıların telkinlere uyma eğilimlerinin daha fazla olduğu, sorumluluk alt boyutu yüksek olan katılımcıların ise, telkinlere uyma eğilimlerinin düşük olduğu ifade edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karavelioğlu, M. B., Başkaya, G., Aydın, S. (2023). Investigation of 30 Meter Sprint Performances with and without Finish Line in Athletes in Terms of Personality Traits. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.1257889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Acar, E., & Karavelioğlu, M. B. (2022). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin kişilik özellikleri ve izlenim yönetimi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.31680/gaunjss.1078326
  2. Allen, M. S., & Laborde, S. (2014). The role of personality in sport and physical activity. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 23(6), 460-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214145507
  3. Allen, M. S., Greenlees, I., & Jones, M. (2013). Personality in sport: A comprehensive review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(1), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2013.769614
  4. Atak, H. (2013). On-maddeli kişilik ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 50, 312-319. Retrieved from: https://www.noropsikiyatriarsivi.com/sayilar/420/buyuk/312-319.pdf
  5. Bayraktar, B., & Kurtoğlu, M. (2009). Sporda performans, etkili faktörler, değerlendirilmesi ve artırılması. Klinik Gelişim Dergisi, 22(1), 16-24. Retrieved from: https://klinikgelisim.org.tr/eskisayi/klinik_2009_22_1/3.pdf
  6. Bojanić, Ž., Nedeljković, J., Šakan, D., Mitić, P.M., Milovanović, I., & Drid, P. (2019). Personality traits and self-esteem in combat and team sports. Frontiers in Psychology, Article 2280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02280
  7. Chirivella, E. C., & Martinez, L. M. (1994). The sensation of risk and motivational tendencies in sports: An empirical study. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90219-4
  8. Clingman, J. M., & Hiliard, D. V. (1987). Some personality characteristics of the super adherer: Following those who go beyond fitness. Journal of Sport Behavior, 10(3), 123–136. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-31212-001
  9. Close, G. L., Sale, C., Baar, K., & Bermon, S. (2019). Nutrition for the prevention and treatment of injuriesin track and field athletes. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 29(2), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0290
  10. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258
  11. Devrim-Lanpir, A., Hill, L., & Knechtle, B. (2021). Efficacy of popular diets applied by endurance athletes on sports performance: Beneficial or detrimental? A narrative review. Nutrients, 13(2), 491. PMID: 3354081. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020491
  12. Ekrami, N., Ahmadian, M., Nourshahi, M., & Shakouri, H. (2021). Wet-cupping induces anti-inflammatory action in response to vigorous exercise among martial arts athletes: A pilot study. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 56, Article 102611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102611
  13. Eysenck, H. J. (1981). A model for personality. Springer-Verlag.
  14. Eysenck, H. J. (1963). Biological basis of personality. Nature, 14(199), 1031-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/1991031a0.
  15. Eysenck, H. J., Nias, D. K., & Cox, D. N. (1982). Sport and personality. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 4, 1-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(82)90004-2
  16. Fuller, J. R. (2011). Martial arts and psychological health: Psychology and psychotherapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02794.x
  17. Garland, D. J., & Barry, J. R. (1990). Personality and leader behaviours in collegiate football: A multidimensional approach to performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(90)90026-3
  18. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr., W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
  19. Gould, D. (1985). Tennis, anyone?. WCB/McGraw-Hill.
  20. Haslam, N., Whelan, J., & Bastian, B. (2009). Big five traits mediate associations between values and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 40-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.001
  21. John, O.P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O.P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and Research (pp. 114-158), Guilford Press.
  22. Kajtna, T., Tusak, M., Barić R., & Burnik, S. (2004). Personality in high-risk sports athletes. Kinesiology, 36(1), 24–34. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-16468-002
  23. Kang, C., Bennett, G., & Peachey, J. W. (2016). Five dimensions of brand personality traits in sport. Sport Management Review, 19(4), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.01.004
  24. Karasar, N. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (28. basım). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  25. Karasimav, Ö., & Yıldız, Y. (2015). Spor hekimliğinde akupunktur uygulamaları. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 50(2), 49-56. Retrieved from: https://journalofsportsmedicine.org/abstract/5/tur
  26. Karavelioğlu, M. B., Altıkat, S., Başkaya, G., & Gökçelik, E. (2019). Investigation of the effect of cupping on some performance and blood parameters in athletes. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 74-84. Kılınç, M., Ulucan, H., Kaya, K., & Türkçapar, Ü. (2011). Takım sporu yapanların motivasyon düzeylerinin farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 133-144. Retrieved from: https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/133731/
  27. Laurin, R. (2009). The influence of the “big five” factors on the demands-abilities fit in soccer academies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109(1), 239–250. doi: 10.2466/PMS.109.1.239-250
  28. Lipert, A., Kozłowski, R., Rasmus, P., Marczak, M., Timler, M., Timler, D., et al. (2021). Sleep quality and performance in professional athletes fasting during the month of ramadan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), Article 6890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136890
  29. Marchese, F., Malagoli Lanzoni, I., & Steca, P. (2022). Personality traits and motives in table tennis players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), Article 10715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710715
  30. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. Guilford Press.
  31. McEwan, D., Boudreau, P., Curran, T., & Rhodes, R. E. (2019). Personality traits of high-risk sport participants: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.02.006
  32. Park, S. H., Lim, B. S., & Lim, S. T. (2020). The effects of self-talk on shooting athletes’ motivation. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 19(3), 517-521. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7429435/
  33. Piepiora, P. (2020). A review of personality research in sport. Pedagogy Psychol. Sport, 6(4), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.12775/PPS.2020.06.04.007
  34. Piepiora, P. (2021a). Personality profile of individual sports champions. Brain and Behavior, 11(6), e02145. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.214
  35. Piepiora, P. (2021b). Assessment of personality traits influencing the performance of men in team sports in terms of the big five. Front. Psychol. 12, 679-724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679724
  36. Piepiora, P., & Witkowski, K. (2020). Personality profile of combat sports champions against neo-gladiators. Arch. Budo, 16(1), 281–293. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357767967_Personality_profile_of_combat_sports_champions_against_neo-gladiators
  37. Piepiora, P., Kwiatkowski, D., Bagińska, J., & Agouridas, D. (2021). Sports level and the personality of American football players in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413026
  38. Roberts, B. W., O'Donnell, M., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Goal and personality trait development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.541
  39. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789-801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008
  40. Sánchez-Oliver, A. J., Domínguez, R., López-Tapia, P., Tobal, F. M., Jodra, P., Montoya, J. J., et al. (2021). A survey on dietary supplement consumption in amateur and professional rugby players. Foods, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010007
  41. Tok, S. (2013). The big five personality traits and risky sport participation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39, 1105–1012. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.8.1105
  42. Vealey, R. (1989). Sport personality: A paradigmatic and methodological analysis. Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology., 11, 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.11.2.216
  43. Karavelioğlu, M. B., Altıkat, S., Başkaya, G., & Gökçelik, E. (2019). Investigation of the effect of cupping on some performance and blood parameters in athletes. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 74-84.