SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Identification of Psychometric Characteristics of Sample of Vocal Behaviour and Interaction Assessment Record Forms

Veysel AKSOY
İbrahim H. DİKEN
Pages
165–183
Publication Date
2016-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings from the analysis revealed that both tools were valid and reliable to be used for obtaining the samples of vocal behaviour of children with ASD, and evaluating their level of social interaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The purpose of this research is to study the Sample of Vocal Behaviour Record Form (SVBRF), included in the third edition of Autism Screening Instrument for Educational Planning-3 (ASIEP-3), and the psychometric properties of the trucked forms for the informal assessment tools of Autism Screening Instrument for Educational Planning-3 (ASIEP-3).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 169 students were included in the study group of the Turkish Version of the SVBRF, 54 females and 115 males.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings from the analysis revealed that both tools were valid and reliable to be used for obtaining the samples of vocal behaviour of children with ASD, and evaluating their level of social interaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Autism Spectrum Disorder · Informal Assessment · Sample of Vocal Behaviour

Özet

Öz The purpose of this research is to study the Sample of Vocal Behaviour Record Form (SVBRF), included in the third edition of Autism Screening Instrument for Educational Planning-3 (ASIEP-3), and the psychometric properties of the trucked forms for the informal assessment tools of Autism Screening Instrument for Educational Planning-3 (ASIEP-3). The rationale for the research is the lack of standardised informal assessment tools to use for the educational assessment of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Turkey. The study group consists of students, who receive education at three private institutions for special education and rehabilitation. A total of 169 students were included in the study group of the Turkish Version of the SVBRF, 54 females and 115 males. And in the study group of the Turkish Version of the IARF, a total of 115 students were included, 37 females and 78 males. The data, which were obtained from the study requiring data collection based on performance feedback, were analysed in order to assess the validity and reliability of the tools. The findings from the analysis revealed that both tools were valid and reliable to be used for obtaining the samples of vocal behaviour of children with ASD, and evaluating their level of social interaction.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSOY, V., DİKEN, İ. H. (2016). Identification of Psychometric Characteristics of Sample of Vocal Behaviour and Interaction Assessment Record Forms. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 165–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/137800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alev, G. (2011). Pragmatik Dil Becerileri Envanteri'nin Türkçe standardizasyon çalışması (Turkish Standardisation of Pragmatic Language Skills Inventory) (Published master’s thesis, Anadolu University, Institute of Medical Sciences, Eskişehir, Turkey). http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi adresinden elde edilmiştir. (Tez no: 288468) Allen, R. A., Robins, D. L., & Decker, S. L. (2008). Autism spectrum disorders: Neurobiology and current assessment practices. Psychology in the Schools, 45(10), 905-917. American Psychiatric Association (APA): Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Revised Edition (DSM-IV-TR), American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC, Translated by Köroğlu, E., Hekimler Yayın Birliği, Ankara 2001.
  2. Atamaz, F., Yağız On, A. ve Durmaz, B. (2007). EGE Aphasia Test: Description of the test and performance in normal subjects. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 53(1), 5-10.
  3. Avcıoğlu, H. (2011). Özel eğitime gereksinim duyan öğrencilerin eğitsel ve davranışsal değerlendirilmesi. Ankara:
  4. Vize Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (12. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. CDC, (2016). Center for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov
  5. Colay, İ. K. (2006). Gülhane Afazi Testi (GAT-2)'nin standardizasyon ve geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (Yayınlanmış yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi,
  6. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, Türkiye). http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi adresinden elde edilmiştir. (Tez no: 193095) De Vellis R. (2014). Scale development. (Ölçek geliştirme kuram ve uygulamalar) Translated by Totan T., Ankara:
  7. Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık. Diken, İ. H., Ardıç, A., Diken, Ö. ve Gilliam, J. E. (2012). Exploring the validity and reliability of Turkish Version of Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-2: Turkish standardization study. Eğitim ve Bilim, 166(37), 318-328.
  8. Dover, C. J., & Le Couteur, A. (2007). How to diagnose autism. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 92, 540-545.
  9. Düver, E. (2006). 5-7 yaş grubu normal gelişim gösteren ve özel gereksinimi olan çocukların dil kullanım (pragmatik) becerilerinin karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  10. Ankara.
  11. Ege, P., Acarlar, F. ve Turan, F. (2005). Ankara Artikülasyon Testi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  12. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  13. Erbaş, D. (2012). Güvenirlik. Elif Tekin-İftar (Ed.) Eğitim ve Davranış Bilimlerinde Tek Denekli Araştırmalar içinde Ankara:
  14. TPD yayınları. Gay, L. R., M