SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Examination of Meeting the Needs of University Students from Social Support Systems

Betül DÜŞÜNCELİ
Tuğba Seda ÇOLAK
Süleyman DEMİR
Mustafa KOÇ
Pages
346–361
Publication Date
2020-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research, it was found that university students regard family as the primary social support system in meeting all their needs (physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to determine which social support systems respectively preferred by students to meet their basic needs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted with 347 university students from Sakarya University Faculty of Education, 243 of whom were female and 104 of whom were male.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research, it was found that university students regard family as the primary social support system in meeting all their needs (physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maslow · hierarchy of needs · social support

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine which social support systems respectively preferred by students to meet their basic needs. The research was conducted with 347 university students from Sakarya University Faculty of Education, 243 of whom were female and 104 of whom were male. A ranking chart was used to determine the rank of fulfilment of the five basic needs of the students, as in the Maslow's hierarchy of needs, (physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization), by social support systems (family, relatives, friends, teacher-school, and society). The data was analyzed by rank order judgment scaling. As a result of the research, it was found that university students regard family as the primary social support system in meeting all their needs (physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization). The ranking does not change in meeting the needs of safety, love and belonging, and esteem; in meeting the physiological needs, it was observed that relatives are preferred more than friends. Another finding of the research is that in meeting the need for self-actualization, relatives are preferred the least.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜŞÜNCELİ, B., ÇOLAK, T. S., DEMİR, S., KOÇ, M. (2020). Examination of Meeting the Needs of University Students from Social Support Systems. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 346–361. https://ajindex.com/articles/137272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akbaş, A. (1989). Ergenlerin kendini gerçekleştirme düzeylerini etkileyen bazı faktörler. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 1-12.
  2. Aksoy, İ. (2011). Türklerde aile ve çocuk eğitimi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(16), 11-19. Retrieved from https://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt4/sayi16_pdf/aksoy_ilhan.pdf
  3. Aksüllü, N., & Doğan, S. (2004). Relationship of social support and depression in institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 5, 76-84. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/777659b5add12fe4592a68b9685eef8a/1?cbl=136214&pq-origsite=gscholar
  4. Anıl, D., & Güler, N. (2006). İkili karşılaştırma yöntemi ile ölçekleme çalışmasına bir örnek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 30-36.
  5. Anıl, D., & İnal, H. (2019). Psikofizikte ölçekleme uygulamaları. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Arslantaş, H., & Ergin, F. (2011). 50-65 yaş arasındaki bireylerde yalnızlık, depresyon, sosyal destek ve etki eden faktörler. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics, 14(2), 135-144
  7. Baykul, F., & Turgut, Y. (1992). Ölçekleme teknikleri. Ankara:
  8. ÖSYM Yayınları.
  9. Bozo, Ö., Toksabay, N. E., & Kürüm, O. (2009). Activities of daily living, depression, and social support among elderly Turkish people. The Journal of Psychology, 143(2), 193-206. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.143.2.193-206
  10. Burger, J. (2006). Kişilik: Psikoloji biliminin insan doğasına dair söyledikleri. İstanbul:
  11. Kaknüs Psikoloji. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Crump, C. A. (1995). Motivating students: A teacher’s challenge. Paper presented at the Sooner Communication Conference, Norman, Oklahoma. Cüceloğlu, D. (2003). İnsan ve davranışı. İstanbul:
  12. Remzi. Doğan, T. (2016). Psikolojik belirtilerin yordayıcısı olarak sosyal destek ve iyilik hali. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(30), 30-44.
  13. Dwyer, A. L., & Cummings A. L. (2001). Stress, self-efficacy, social support, and coping strategies in university students. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 35(3), 208-220. Retrieved from https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/article/view/58672/44160
  14. Engin, A. O., Özen, Ş., & Bayoğlu, V. (2009). Öğrencilerin okul öğrenme başarılarını etkileyen bazı t