Journals / Bahçe / 1985 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1-2

Researches on Rootstock of Plum-1

Erik Anaç Araştırmaları-1

Journal
Bahçe
Pages
69–75
Publication Date
1985-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A trial has been established with the combination of those rootstocks and Papaz, Formoza cultivars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to determine the rootstock characteristics of some cultivars and types belong to Prunus cerasifera Ehr. species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The seed germination percentage, the uniformity of height and trunk diameter of seedling, the thickness of seedling for budding in the same year, growth habit were used as criteria to select of these rootstocks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A trial has been established with the combination of those rootstocks and Papaz, Formoza cultivars.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:8 samples
⚙️Variables:Erik · Anaç · Araştırma

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the rootstock characteristics of some cultivars and types belong to Prunus cerasifera Ehr. species. The seed germination percentage, the uniformity of height and trunk diameter of seedling, the thickness of seedling for budding in the same year, growth habit were used as criteria to select of these rootstocks. Selected good samples according to those characteristics budded with Papaz and Formoza cultivars, growing capability of scions has been searched Those 8 samples; 33/2, 48/2, 52/2, EK.4/2, EK.6/2, EK.13, EK.15/1 has been selected at the end of nursery stage. A trial has been established with the combination of those rootstocks and Papaz, Formoza cultivars.

Özet

Bu çalışma Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. türüne ait bazı erik çeşit ve tiplerinin anaçlık değerlerini saptamak için ele alınmıştır. Tohumların çimlenme yüzdeleri, çöğürlerin boy ve çap üniformiteleri, aynı yıl aşıya gelme durumları, aşı tutma yüzdeleri ve aşının gelişme durumu fidanlık devresinde seçimde kullanılan kriterler olmuş ve buna göre ümitli olan 8 anaç adayı seçilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gönülşen, N., Özvardar, S., Baldıran, E. (1985). Researches on Rootstock of Plum-1. Bahçe, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1-2, 69–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/1372672

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bajwa, G.S., A.S. Sanahu, N.N. Khajuria, 1981. Seeds Germination Studies in Plum. Hort. Abs. 51(9):6803.
  2. Beakbane, A.B., M.M. Fuller, 1973. Intensive Culture of Plums. Fruit Present and Future. 11:96-99.
  3. Chandler, W.A., 1957. Deciduous Orchards. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA.
  4. Childers, N.F., 1961. Modern Fruit Science. Horticultural Publications New Jersey USA.
  5. Davis, L.H. (Ed) 1972. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Vol: 4. Edinburgh Univ. Press.
  6. Glenn, E.M., 1960. Rootstocks for Plums. Annual Report of East Mailing Research Station.
  7. Haber, S., J.P. Mahlstede, 1965. Plant Propagation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York. USA.
  8. Hartmann, H.T., D.E. Kester, 1975. Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. Prentice Hall. Inc. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey. USA.
  9. Herrero, J., 1978. Stratification of Myrobolan Stones. Anales de la Estacion Experimental de Aula Dei. 14(1/2):173-180.
  10. Mosse, B., 1962. Graft-Incompatibility in Fruit Trees. Technical Com. No.28. Common Wealth Bureau of Hort. and Plantation Crop. England.
  11. Özçağıran, R., 1976. Türkiye’de Mevcut Erik Türlerinin Teşhisi ve Bunlardan P.cerasifera Türüne Ait Bazı Çeşitlerin Meyve Özellikleri. Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, Yayın No:276.
  12. Tukey, N.B., 1964. Dwarfed Fruit Trees. The McMillan Company. New York. USA.
  13. Way, R.D., F.G. Dennis, R.M. Fiemen, 1967. Propagating Fruit Trees in New York. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. No:817.