SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bahçe / 2026 / Cilt: 45 Sayı: (Özel Sayı 1) 7. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi Özel Sayı

Evaluation of the Use of Different PGPR’s on Cucurbitaceae Family

Cucurbitaceae (Kabakgiller) Familyasında Farklı PGPR’ların Kullanımının Değerlendirilmesi

Ceren Ayşe Bayram
Aygül Dayan
Nebahat Sarı
Journal
Bahçe
Pages
402–408
Publication Date
2016-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As well as PGPR’s are used for effecting on yield.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PGPR’s effect and play an important role on yield, plant growth, fruit quality and mineral content of leaves are known in all over the World.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cucurbitaceae production is around 172 million tons in the world (FAO, 2015).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As well as PGPR’s are used for effecting on yield.
🔬Design:Konferans Bildirisi
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:PGPR · kabakgiller · etki durumu

Abstract

PGPR’s effect and play an important role on yield, plant growth, fruit quality and mineral content of leaves are known in all over the World. For this aim; many studies are carried out on horticulture and field crops in our country and in the World. Cucurbitaceae family vegetables are in all vegetables have an important share of both production and health. Cucurbitaceae production is around 172 million tons in the world (FAO, 2015). Free living, promoting plant growing, for the purpose of biological control and biological fertilization bacterias are called “Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria=PGPR”. Evaluated 27 studies on Cucurbitaceae family, PGPR’s were used mostly as plant protection. As well as PGPR’s are used for effecting on yield.

Özet

PGPR’ların verim, bitki gelişimi, meyve kalitesine etki ettiği ve yapraklarda mineral madde içeriklerinde önemli rol oynadığı tüm dünyada bilinmektedir. Bu amaçla; dünyada ve ülkemizde farklı bahçe ve tarla bitkilerinde çalışmalar yürütülmüştür. Kabakgiller familyası sebzeleri tüm sebzeler içerisinde hem sağlık, hem de üretim bakımından önemli paya sahiptir. Sebze üretimi içerisinde Cucurbitaceae (Kabakgiller) üretimi dünyada yaklaşık 172 milyon tondur (FAO, 2013). Serbest yaşayan, bitki gelişimini teşvik eden, biyolojik mücadele veya biyolojik gübreleme amacıyla kullanılan bakterilere “Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Eden Kök Bakterileri (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria=PGPR)” adı verilmektedir. Kabakgiller familyasında değerlendirmesini yaptığımız 27 adet çalışmada, PGPR’ların ağırlıklı olarak bitki koruma amaçlı veya verimi arttırmak için kullanıldığı belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bayram, C. A., Dayan, A., Sarı, N. (2016). Evaluation of the Use of Different PGPR’s on Cucurbitaceae Family. Bahçe, Cilt: 45 Sayı: (Özel Sayı 1) 7. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi Özel Sayı, 402–408. https://ajindex.com/articles/1372238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Arcak, S., Güven, N. 2004. Biyolojik gübrelemenin sürdürülebilir ekosistemdeki önemi. Türkiye 3. Ulusal Gübre Kongresi, Tarım-Sanayi-Çevre, 837-844, Tokat.
  2. Bayram, C.A., 2014. Adıyaman koşullarında bazı bitki aktivatörlerinin Galia C8 ve Kırkağaç 637 kavun çeşitlerinde verim, kalite, bitki büyümesi ve beslenme durumuna etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 129s (Basılmamış).
  3. Chen, X.B., Zhang, B.X., Lou, B.G., Li, J.Y., 1999. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on disease control of cucumber seedlings. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 25(6):578-582.
  4. Chen C., Belanger R.R., Benhamou, N., Paulitz T., 2000. Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 56:13-23.
  5. Dereboylu, A.E., Tort, N., 2009. Bazı bitki aktivatör ve fungisit uygulamalarının Cucumis sativus L. (Hıyar) bitkisinde verim-kalite üzerine etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 31(1):30-42.
  6. Dursun, A., Ekinci, M., Dönmez, F., 2010. Effects of foliar application of plant growth promoting bacterium on Chemical contents, yield and growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Pak. J. Bot., 42(5):3349-3356.
  7. El-Aal El-Rahman, H.M.A., 2014. Impact of PGPR and inorganic fertilization on growth and productivity of sweet Ananas melon. International Journal of Agriculture Science and Research, 4(3):11-26.
  8. Elbeshehy, E.K.F., Youssef, S.S., Elazzazy, A.M., 2015. Resistance induction in pumpkin Cucurbita maxima L. against watermelon Mosaic Potyvirus by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 25(5):525-542.
  9. El-Borollosy, A.M., Oraby, M.M., 2012. Induced systemic resistance against Cucumber Mosaic Cucumovirus and promotion of cucumber growth by some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annals of Agriculture Science (Cairo), 57(2):121-130.
  10. FAO, 2013. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/q/qc/ (Erişim: 20 Temmuz 2015).
  11. Gül, A., Özaktan, H., Kıdoğlu, F., Tüzel, Y., 2013. Rhizobacteria promoted yield of cucumber plants grown in perlite under Fusarium wilt stress. Oxford, UK, Scientia Horticulturae, 153, 22-25.
  12. Habibi, A., Heidari, G., Sohrabi, Y., Badakhshan, H., Mohammadi, K., 2011. Influence of bio, organic and Chemical fertilizers on medicinal pumpkin traits. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5(23):5590-5597.
  13. Irannejad, R., Rezadust, S., Rushdi, M., 2011. Evaluation of biological fertilizers potential for providing nitrogen need in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo). Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 8(5):873-879.
  14. Jeffrey, C.A., 2005. New system of Cucurbitaceae botanicheskii zhumal 90:332-335.
  15. Kıdoglu, F., Gül, A., Özaktan, H., Tüzel, Y., 2008. Effect of rhizobacteria on plant growth of different vegetables. Acta Horticulturae, 801:1471-1477.
  16. Kokalis-Burelle, N., Vavrina, C.S., Reddy, M.S., Kloepper, J.W., 2003. Amendment of muskmelon and watermelon transplant media with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; effects on seedling quality, disease and nematode resistance. Hort Technology 13:476-482.
  17. Liu, L., Kloepper, J.W., Tuzun, S., 1995. induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against bacterial angular leaf spot by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 85:843-847.
  18. Maleki, M.,Mostafaee, S., Mokhtamejad, L., Farzaneh, M., 2010. Characterization of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CV6 isolated from Cucumber rhizosphere in varamin as a potential biocontrol agent. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(9):676-683.
  19. Mirik, M., 2005. Biberde bakteriyel leke etmeni Xanthomonas axonopodispv. vesicatoria’nın tanılanması ve bitki büyüme düzenleyici rizobakteriler ile biyolojik mücadele olanakları. Doktora Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı, 162s.
  20. Raupach, L.L., Murphy, J.F., Tuzun, S., Kloepper, W., 1996. Induced systemic resistance in Cucumber and tomato against Cucumber Mosaic Cucumovirus using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). The American Phtopathological Society, Plant Disease, 80(8):891-894.
  21. Raupach, G.S., Kloepper, J.W., 2000. Biocontrol of cucumber diseases in the field by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with and without methyl bromide fumigation. American Phytopathological Society (APS Press), St. Paul, USA, Plant Disease, 84, 10, pp:1073-1075.
  22. Refai, E.F., Foly, H., Dakhly, O.F., 2010. Growth and yield of zucchini type summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) fertilized by combined Azotobacter chroococum mutants and mineral n-fertilization. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 88(1):241-255.
  23. Shehata, S.F., El-Borollosy, A.M., 2008. Induction of resistance against Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Potyvirus and growth enhancement of squash plants using some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2(2):174-182.
  24. Shunhua S., Ping W., Baotian, X., Guoyi, G., 2011. Inhibitory effects and control efficacy of Paenibacillus polymyxa WY110 on Fusarium oxysporum of watermelon. Asian PGPR Society, Aubum, USA, Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the 2. Asian PGPR Conference, Beijing, China, 21-24 August, 393p.
  25. Utkhede, R.S., Koch, C.A., Menzies, J.G., 1999. Rhizobacterial growth and yield promotion of Cucumber plants inoculated with Phytium aphanidermatum. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 38:1270-1273.
  26. Van Loon, L.C., Bakker, P.A.H.M., Pieterse, C.M.J., 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 36:453-483.
  27. Wang, C.J., Yang, W., Wang, C., Gu, C., Niu, D.D., Liu, H.X., Wang, Y.P., Guo, J., 2012. Induction of drought tolerance in cucumber plants by a consortium of three plant growth promoting rhizobacterium strains Public Library of Sciences (PLoS), San Francisco, USA, PLoS ONE, 7(12):e52565.
  28. Wei, G., Kloepper, J.W., Tuzun, S.1991-a. Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 81:1508-1512.
  29. Wei, G., Kloepper, J.W., Tuzun, S., 1991-b. Induction of systemic resistance with seed treatment by PGPR strains. Bulletin SROP. 14(8):191-194.
  30. Yıldırım, E., Ekinci, M., Dursun, A., Karagöz, K., 2015. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improved seedling growth and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). International Conference on Chemical, Food and Environment Engineering (ICCFEE15) Jan. 11-12, Dubai (UAE).
  31. Zhao, Q., Shen, Q., Ran, W., Xiao, T., Xu, D., Xu, Y., 2011. Inoculation of soil by Bacillus subtilis Y-IVI improves plant growth and colonization of the rhizosphere and interior tissues of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47(5):507-514.
  32. Zhang, S., White, M.C., Mclnroy, J.A., Kloepper, J.W., Klassen, W., 2010. Evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for control of Phytophthora blight on squash under greenhouse conditions. Biological Control. 53(1):129-135.