SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarih Okulu Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 36

THE EVALUATİON OF THE QUALİTY OF LİFE OF STUDENTS LEARNİNG AT THE HIGH SCHOOL OF PHYSİCAL EDUCATİON AND SPORT

MEHMET DALKILIÇ
HÜDAVERDİ MAMAK
Pages
338–350
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

SPSS (20) statistical program was used in the evaluation of the obtained data and the level of significance (P <0.05) was taken.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is; Niğde University Physical Education and Sports at Department of sports administrator and Department of physical education and sport teacher the quality of the environment in which students are presented to the university.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 251 people voluntarily participated in the survey, 101 of which were sports administrators and 150 were physical education teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:SPSS (20) statistical program was used in the evaluation of the obtained data and the level of significance (P <0.05) was taken.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The purpose of this study is; Niğde University Physical Education and Sports at Department of sports administrator and Department of physical education and sport teacher the quality of the environment in which students are presented to the university. A total of 251 people voluntarily participated in the survey, 101 of which were sports administrators and 150 were physical education teachers. The data in the study were collected using the "University Quality of Life Scale" developed by Doğanay and Sarı in 2004. University Quality of Life Scale is a measure of 33 items collected in 7 factors. The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was 0.87 for the total score. 26,3% of the students were 21 years old, 21,1% were 22 years old, 15,1% were 20 or 23 years old; 62.9% were male and 37.1% were female. 59.8% are in the department of physical education and sports teacher, and 40.2% are students in the department of sports administration. As a result of this research, between the ages of the students and university quality of life scale scores. There was no significant difference between the gender of the students and university quality of life scale scores and between students' sections and university life quality scale scores. SPSS (20) statistical program was used in the evaluation of the obtained data and the level of significance (P <0.05) was taken.

🔖

Cite This Article

DALKILIÇ, M., MAMAK, H. (2018). THE EVALUATİON OF THE QUALİTY OF LİFE OF STUDENTS LEARNİNG AT THE HIGH SCHOOL OF PHYSİCAL EDUCATİON AND SPORT. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 36, 338–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/137207

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. ABDULLAH b. Mübarek, ez-Zühd ve’r-Rekâik, I-II, Riyad, 1995
  2. CALVİN, John, Institutes of the Christian Religion, I-II, Edinburgh, 1845 CALVİN, John, Kutsal Kitap Hıristiyanlığı, I-III, http://www.presbiteryen.org
  3. DENİZ, Ergün, Sabri Fehmi Ülgener’in İktisadi-Felsefi Anlayışı, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  4. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, 2009
  5. DENİZ, Osman Murat, “John Calvin’nin Teolojisi ve Özgünlüğü Üzerine” Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Sayı: 33 Kasım – Aralık 2012, 1-16
  6. HANKS, Merry E. Wiesner, Erken Modern Dönemde Avrupa 1450-1789, terc. Hamit Çalışkan, İstanbul, 2012, 255-258
  7. HAZARD, Paul, Batı Düşüncesindeki Büyük Değişme, terc. Erol Güngör, İstanbul, 1999
  8. KALLEK, Cengiz, “Mâverdî” DİA, XXVIII, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, İstanbul, 2003, 180-186
  9. KALLEK, Cengiz, Asr-ı Saadette Piyasa-Yönetim İlişkisi, İstanbul, 1997
  10. KATİP Çelebi, Mîzânül-Hak fî İhtiyâri’l-Ehakk, sadeleştirenler: Süleyman Uludağ-Mustafa Kara, İstanbul, 2001 KINALIZÂDE, Ali Çelebi, Ahlâk-ı Alâî, haz. Mustafa Koç, İstanbul, 2007
  11. KÜNDEYİ, Fatma Zehra, Ülgener’de Din ve Kapitalizm, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi,
  12. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sosyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Afyon, 2009 MÂVERDÎ, Ebu’l-Hasan Ali b. Muhammed, Edebü’d-dünyâ ve’d-dîn, Beyrut, 2008 MEKKÎ, Ebû Tâlib, Kûtu’l-kulûb, I-IV, terc. Muharrem Tan, İstanbul, 1999
  13. MEZ, Adam, Onuncu Yüzyılda İslam Medeniyeti, terc. Salih Şaban, İstanbul 2000
  14. OCAK, Ahmet Yaşar, “Fütüvvet” DİA, XIII, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, İstanbul, 1996
  15. ÖZKİRAZ, Ahmet, Sabri F. Ülgener’de Zihniyet Analizi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sosyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 1999
  16. PROUDHON, Pierre-Joseph, Mülkiyet nedir?, terc. Vedat Gülşen Üretürk, İstanbul, 1969
  17. SAYAR, Ahmet Güner “Prof. Dr. Sabr. F. Ülgener Hayatı ve Eserlerine Dair Özet Bir Sergileme” İş Ahlak Dergisi, İGİAD 2008, Cilt 1, Say 1, 123- 136. SAYAR, Ahmet Güner Sayar, Osmanlı İktisat Düşüncesinin Çağdaşlaşması, İstanbul, 2000
  18. SAYAR, Ahmet Güner, Bir İktisatçının Entelektüel Portresi: Sabri F.Ülgener, İstanbul, 2007 SERAHSÎ, Şemsüleimme, el-Mebsût, I-XXX, Beyrut, 1993
  19. ŞAHİN, Lütfü, Sabri Fehmi Ülgener’in Ekonomi Politik Anlayışı ve Türk Düşüncesine Katkıları, Gazi Üniversitesi,
  20. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 2009 ŞEYBÂNÎ, Muhammed b. Hasan, Kitâbü’l-Kesb İslam İktisadında Helal Kazanç, terc. Mustafa Baktır, İstanbul, 1993
  21. TARAKÇI, Muhammet, “Kalvinizm’de Kader Anlayışı” Uluda