Journals / Bahçe / 2026 / Cilt: 54 Sayı: Özel Sayı 1 Özel Sayı

Effect of Pre-Sowing Seed Treatments on Seedling Quality in Hollyhock Genotypes

Gülhatmi Genotiplerinde Ekim Öncesi Tohum Uygulamalarının Fide Kalitesine Etkisi

Emine Erğan(Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2501-5420
Kübra Özmen(Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi)0000-0001-8554-7918
Fulya Uzunoğlu(Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi)0000-0003-4390-0407
Kazım Mavi(Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi)0000-0003-0195-8539
Journal
Bahçe
Pages
375–381
Publication Date
2025-03-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When all the findings were evaluated together, it was observed that U9, U10 treatments had significant effects on seedling quality for the genotypes used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study contains hollyhock (Alcea rosea L.) species collected from nature on 3 different genotypes collected from nature, in order to determine the effect of pre-planting seed treatments on seedling quality, in 2022 Hatay Mustafa Kemal University research greenhouses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, control and in order to eliminate dormancy in the seeds, a back-to-front single piercing (U6) and a back-to-front single piercing were applied along with gibberellic acid (U7), Ferula (U8), water (U9), potassium nitrate (U10).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When all the findings were evaluated together, it was observed that U9, U10 treatments had significant effects on seedling quality for the genotypes used.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Alcea rosea L · Delme · fide performansı

Abstract

This study contains hollyhock (Alcea rosea L.) species collected from nature on 3 different genotypes collected from nature, in order to determine the effect of pre-planting seed treatments on seedling quality, in 2022 Hatay Mustafa Kemal University research greenhouses. In the study, control and in order to eliminate dormancy in the seeds, a back-to-front single piercing (U6) and a back-to-front single piercing were applied along with gibberellic acid (U7), Ferula (U8), water (U9), potassium nitrate (U10). Treatments were also made and planted. Seedling measurements were carried out on the 40th and 180th days after planting. The best results in terms of stem diameter, leaf width and length in the first measured values of seedling characteristics were obtained from the U10 treatment in Genotype 1. The treatment that showed the highest true leaf and seedling development was the U0 and U9 treatment. When the final measurements were evaluated were highest values in Genotype 1, U0 treatment, The highest leaf dry weight was obtained from the U8 group in Genotype 3. When all the findings were evaluated together, it was observed that U9, U10 treatments had significant effects on seedling quality for the genotypes used.

Özet

Bu çalışma gülhatmi (Alcea rosea L.) türüne ait doğadan toplanan 3 farklı genotip üzerinde ekim öncesi tohum uygulamalarının fide kalitesine etkisinin belirlenmesi amacıyla 2022 yılında Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi araştırma seralarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada tohumlar uygulama yapılmadan (kontrol, U0) ve tohumlardaki dormansinin giderilmesi amacıyla arkalı önlü tek delme (U6) ve arkalı önlü tek delme uygulamasının beraberinde giberellik asit (U7), Ferula sakız ekstraktı (U8), saf su (U9), potasyum nitrat (U10) uygulamaları da yapılarak ekilmiştir. Ekim işleminden itibaren 40. ve 180. günlerde fide ölçümleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Fide özelliklerinde ilk ölçüm değerlerinde gövde çapı, yaprak eni ve boyu açısından en iyi sonuçlar Genotip 1’de U10 uygulamasından elde edilmiştir. En fazla gerçek yaprak ve fide gelişimi gösteren uygulama ise Genotip 1’de U0 uygulaması olmuştur. Son ölçümler değerlendirildiğinde ise fide boyu, gövde çapı, yaprak eni değeri ve nispi nem içeriği en yüksek Genotip 1’de U0 uygulamasından, yaprak yaş ağırlığı, kardeşlenme oranı, kardeşlenme sayısı, yaprak boyu ve en fazla gerçek yaprak sayısı Genotip 1’de U9 uygulamasından elde edilmiştir. Yaprak kuru ağırlığı en yüksek Genotip 3’te U8 grubundan elde edilmiştir. Tüm bulgular birlikte değerlendirildiğinde kullanılan genotipler için U9 ve U10 uygulamalarının fide gelişimi üzerine diğer uygulamalara kıyasla daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erğan, E., Özmen, K., Uzunoğlu, F., Mavi, K. (2025). Effect of Pre-Sowing Seed Treatments on Seedling Quality in Hollyhock Genotypes. Bahçe, Cilt: 54 Sayı: Özel Sayı 1 Özel Sayı, 375–381. https://doi.org/10.53471/bahce.1593094

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Xu, Z., Deng, M. 2017. Malvaceae. Identification and Control of Common Weeds 2:717-735.
  2. Erarslan, Z. B., Kocyigit, M. 2019. The important taxonomic characteristics of the family Malvaceae and the Herbarium specimens in ISTE. Turkish Journal of Bioscience and Collections 3(1):1-7.
  3. Uzunhisarcıklı, M.E., Vural, M. 2012. The taxonomic revision of Alcea and Althea (Malvaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 36(6):603-636.
  4. Battal, A., Görmez, G., Türker, M. 2019. Tıbbi öneme sahip hatmiler için etkili bir çimlendirme yöntemi: tohum kabuğuna çentik atılması. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bil. Dergisi 8(3):843-851.
  5. Gao, W., Zheng, W., Bai, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Wu., Z. 2022. Transcriptome analysis in Alcea rosea L. and identification of critical genes involved in stamen petaloid. Scientia Horitculturae 293, 1-9.
  6. Kaya, I., Gülser, F. 2018. Determining heavy metal contents of hollyhock (Alcea rosea L.) in roadside soils of a Turkish Lake basin. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 27(5):2081-2087.
  7. Lim, T.K. 2012. Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer. 1:656-687.
  8. Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M. 2003. Classification, biogeography, and phylogenetic relationships of seed dormancy. (R.D. Smith, J.B. Dickie, H.W. Prichard). Seed Conservation: Turning Science into Practice. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 1842460528, 1023.
  9. Ammar, N.M., El-Kashoury, E.-S.A., El-Kassem, L.T.A., El-Hakeem, R.E.A. 2013. Evaluation of the phenolic content and antioxidant potential of A.rosea cultivated in Egypt. Journal of The Arab Society for Medical Research 8:48-50.
  10. Shooshtarian, S., Salehi, H. 2010. Enhancing Alcea aucheri (Boiss.) Alef. seed germination by application of some scarification treatments. Advances in Environmental Biology 4(2):216-219.
  11. ISTA Germination Committee, 2009. ISTA Handbook on seedling evaluation. 3. Edition, ISTA, Bassersdorf.
  12. Dhanda, S.S., Sethi, G.S. 1998. Inheritance of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Euphytica 104:39-47.
  13. Mavi K., 2009. Kabakgil türlerinde tohum gücü testlerinin kullanımı ve stres koşullarında çıkış ile ilişkileri (Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri, Ankara, 207s.
  14. Dhakal, S., Hassan, J., Rajib, M.M.R., Ghosh, T.K., Gomasta, J., Biswas, M.S., Ozaki, Y., Shanta, S.H., Rahman, M.M. 2023. Seed priming and GA₃ field application enhanced growth, yield and postharvest quality of okra. Trends in Horticulture 6(2):3578.
  15. Orsenigo, S., Mondoni, A., Tazzari, E.R., Vagge, I., Rossi, G., Abeli, T. 2019. Seed dormancy and seedling growth changes in response to scarification treatments and population origin in Kosteletzkya pentacarpos (Malvaceae). Seed Science and Technology 47(1):59-64.
  16. Murtıć, S., Gavrıć, T., Hasanbegovıć, A., Avdıć, J., Bečıć, B., Šerbo, A. 2023. Dormancy-breaking treatments for enhancing seed germination in plant Kitaibela vitifolia Willd. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 119(1):1-8.