It also discusses the current structural provisions that support or hinder union democracy in a direct manner under the Trade Unions and Collective Labor Agreements Act No. 6356 regime in comparison to the former union laws.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:From the earliest days of the labor movement, rank-and-file members’ supposed democratic control over their trade unions has been a constant problem due to certain sociological factors that reinforce oligarchy in organizations, and the five-decade Turkish experience of free unionism has proven to be no exception to this general tendency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Secondly, it examines the post-1982 Turkish context of unionism structurally and procedurally on the issues of centralism, union organs, delegation and workplace representation, and asserts that the union organizational structure in Turkey further reinforces oligarchical rule, preventing the emergence of opposition and leadership contention within large unions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It also discusses the current structural provisions that support or hinder union democracy in a direct manner under the Trade Unions and Collective Labor Agreements Act No. 6356 regime in comparison to the former union laws.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Union Democracy · Iron Law of Oligarchy · Turkish Trade Unionism
Özet
From the earliest days of the labor movement, rank-and-file members’ supposed democratic control over their trade unions has been a constant problem due to certain sociological factors that reinforce oligarchy in organizations, and the five-decade Turkish experience of free unionism has proven to be no exception to this general tendency. This article first of all discusses the basics of union democracy as a concept and clarifies the fundamental difficulties for its consolidation. Secondly, it examines the post-1982 Turkish context of unionism structurally and procedurally on the issues of centralism, union organs, delegation and workplace representation, and asserts that the union organizational structure in Turkey further reinforces oligarchical rule, preventing the emergence of opposition and leadership contention within large unions. It also discusses the current structural provisions that support or hinder union democracy in a direct manner under the Trade Unions and Collective Labor Agreements Act No. 6356 regime in comparison to the former union laws.
SİPAHİ, İ. (2017). Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, Sayı: 71, 99–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/1364
Cook, A. H. (1963). Union Democracy: Practice and Ideal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Çelik, N., Canikoğlu, N., Canbolat, T. (2015). İş Hukuku Dersleri. 28. Bası. Beta Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Dahl, R. A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Demirdizen, D., Lordoğlu, K. (2013). Türkiye'de Sendika İçi Demokrasi ya da Bir İmkansızın Arayışı Mı? Sosyal Haklar Uluslararası Sempozyumu, pp. 223–241.
Dereli, B. (1977). Teori ve Uygulama Yöniyle Türkiye’de Sendika-İçi Demokrasi Sorunu. Ph.D. Dissertation. Istanbul University. Dereli, T. (1998). Sendika İçi Demokrasi. Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi (Cilt 3). Kültür Bakanlığı ve Tarih Vakfı, İstanbul, pp. 23–26.
Dereli, T. (2014). 6356 Sayılı Yeni Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunu: Süreçler, Sorunlar ve Öneriler. Çimento İşverenleri Dergisi, 28/1, pp. 10–33.
Deren-Yıldırım, N. (2001). Sendika-içi Demokrasi. Prof. Dr. Nuri Çelik'e Armağan. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul. Cilt II, pp. 1698–1726.
Eaton, J. (2006). Union Democracy and Union Renewal: The CAW Public Review Board. Relations Industrielles, 61, 2, pp. 201–220.
Edelstein, D. J., Warner, M. (1979). Comparative Union Democracy: Organization and Opposition in British and American Unions. New Jersey: Transaction Books. Esener, T., Gümrükçüoğlu, Y. B. (2014).
Sendika Hukuku. Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul.
Hurd, R. W. (2000). Professional Employees and Union Democracy: From Control to Chaos. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 1, pp. 103–115.
Levi, M., Olson, D., Agnone, J., Kelly, D. (2009). Union Democracy Reexamined. Politics and Society, 37, 2, pp. 203–228.
Lipset, S. M., Trow, M. A., Coleman, J. S. (1977). Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. Garden City, NY: Free Press.
Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York, NY: Hearst’s International Library Co. Sipahi, I. (2017). Scrutinizing Union Democracy: Organization and Opposition in Turkish Unions of the Post-1982 Context. Ph.D. Dissertation, 2nd Ed. Istanbul Bilgi University, Ana Basın Yayın. Slichter, S. (1947). The Government of Trade Unions. Challenge of Industrial Relations. Ithaca: N.Y.: Cornell University Press, pp. 100–101.
Stepan-Norris, J. (1997). The Making of Union Democracy. Social Forces, University of North Carolina Press, 76, 2, pp. 475–510.
Stepan-Norris, J., Zeitlin, M. (1995).
Union Democracy, Radical Leadership and the Hegemony of