Journals / Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 1988 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

(A comparative serological research on Brucellosis using blood sera collected from humans and domestic animals)

İnsan ve Hayvan Kan Serumlarının Brucellosis Yönünden Çeşitli Muayen ile Mukayeseli Araştırılması

Pages
55–68
Publication Date
1988-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Many good results are being obtained by using sero-ring test in our laboratory for a long time this test is decided to :be the easiest test for the veterinary surgeons both in the field trials and in the laboratories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A comparative serological research on Brucellosis using blood sera collected from humans and domestic animals. 208 cattle blood sera which have been vaccinated with S-19 vaccine, 623 vaccinated and infected cattle blood sera, 92 blood sera of aborted sheep and goats and 154 human blood sera that have been sent from various hospitals in Turkey were tested comparatively by using sero-ring, agglutination, Rivanol and Complement- fixation tests. lt was observed that there is a paralelism between agglutination and sero-ring tests and rivanal and complement-fixation tests.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By agglutination test, although good results can be obtained in .acute brucellosis cases, the blood sera showing negative results and low titers must be examinated by the help of the other auxillarytests. lt is determined that there is a possibility of an infection in the case of similor of the same reactions in Rivanal and agglutination tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Many good results are being obtained by using sero-ring test in our laboratory for a long time this test is decided to :be the easiest test for the veterinary surgeons both in the field trials and in the laboratories.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Brucella · Brucellosis · İnsanlarda Brucellosis

Abstract

A comparative serological research on Brucellosis using blood sera collected from humans and domestic animals. 208 cattle blood sera which have been vaccinated with S-19 vaccine, 623 vaccinated and infected cattle blood sera, 92 blood sera of aborted sheep and goats and 154 human blood sera that have been sent from various hospitals in Turkey were tested comparatively by using sero-ring, agglutination, Rivanol and Complement- fixation tests. lt was observed that there is a paralelism between agglutination and sero-ring tests and rivanal and complement-fixation tests. By agglutination test, although good results can be obtained in .acute brucellosis cases, the blood sera showing negative results and low titers must be examinated by the help of the other auxillarytests. lt is determined that there is a possibility of an infection in the case of similor of the same reactions in Rivanal and agglutination tests. It is also determind that the complement-fixation and rivanol tests have a great value in the differentiation of vaccination and infection titers. Some wrong positive reactions are seen in the high titers in the examination of haemolyzed sera by the rivanol test. Many good results are being obtained by using sero-ring test in our laboratory for a long time this test is decided to :be the easiest test for the veterinary surgeons both in the field trials and in the laboratories.

Özet

Brucella abortus S. 19 aşısı ile aşılı 208 adet. enfekte aşılı sığır kan serumu 623 adet ve albort yapmış ·koyun-keçiye ait 92 adet kan serumu ile çeşili hastanelerden gelen 154 adet insan kan serumu olmak üzere 1077 adet serum sero-ring test, Aglutinasyon, Rivanol ve Complement-fixation testleri ile mukayeseli muayene edilmiştir. Aglutinasyon ile sero-ring test ve Rivanol ile Complement-fixation testl-ednin paralel çalıştığı, Agutinasyıon test ile akut bruceilasis vak'alarından çok iyi sonuç alınmakta ise de, bu test ile negatif veya düşük titre gösteren serumlar diğer yardımcı testlerle muayene edilmelidir. Rivanol ve Aglutinasyon testlerinde birbirine yakın veya aynı derecede reaksiyon meydana gelmesi bir enfeksiyonun olabileceğini, Comp!oement-fixation ve Rivanol testlerinin aşı ve enfeksiyon titrelerinin tefrikinde büyük bir değer taşıdığını. Rivanal test ile hemolizli serumların muayenesinde yüksek. titrede yanlış pozitif reaksiyonların görüldüğü. Sero-ring test ile laboratuvarımızıda uzun zamandan beri yapılan çalışmalardan çok iyi sonuç alınmıştır. Gerek laboratuvarlarda ve gerekse sahada veterinerler tarafından kolayca uygulanabilecek •bir metod olduğu kanısına varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMAN, Z., GÜLER, E. (1988). (A comparative serological research on Brucellosis using blood sera collected from humans and domestic animals). Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 55–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/136081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AHVONEN, P.ETAL (1969): Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. 75-291
  2. ALTON, G.G. and JONES, LM. (1967) Laboratory techniques in brucellesis WHO Mono·graph Series No: 55. ALTON, G.G., JONES, L.M. and PIETZ, D.E. (.1975): Laboratory techniques in 'brucellosis. WHO Monograph Series No: 55, 2nd. edition. BUXTON, A., FRASER, F. (:1977): Animal Microbiology. Vol. 1: lmmunology, Bacteriology. Micology, Diseases of fish and laboratory Methods. Cases Olascoagar, Seralogic diagnosis of brucellosis. Zoonosis-Bull., 1976, 28, No: 3/4 Centre of International projects GKNT Moscow, (1982) Vol. 2. DIAZ, R.ETAL (1970) in: Proceeding of the fifth international congress on infectious Diseases, Vienza, Vol. 2, Bacteria, p. 11. DOGUER, M. (1967): Brucellosis' in teşhisinde (CF) testinin tüp aglutinasyon test ile mukeyesesi ve bu testin aşılı ineklerin enfektelerden ayrılması bakımından önemi. Tübitak 1. Bilim Kongresinde tebliğ edilmiştir. 4-6
  3. Ekim. EREM, R., ÜNAL, S. (1968): Brucella serolojisinde Rivanal (Acridin boya testi) Pendik Vet. Kont. ve Araşt. Enst. Derg. 2, 45-51. ' HECK, F.C., DEYCE, B.L. and WILLIAMS, J.D. (1982): Veterinary lmmunology and lmmunopathology. 3, 629-634.
  4. Huber, J.D., NICOUETTI, P. (1986): American Journal of Veterinary Research 47 (7), 1529-1531.
  5. HURVELL, B. and LINDBERG, A.A. (1973): Acta path. Microbiol Scand. Se ct. B. 81, 113. İnfeksiyon Dergisi {1987): 1 (2-3), 133-15.
  6. Türk Mikrobiyoloji Cemiyeti. LAMBERT, D. and THOMAS, E AMERAULT, B.S. (1962): Comporative Study of the serological tests for detecting the response in cattle to virulent Brucella abortus American Journal Vet. Research 529-533.
  7. MCNAUGHT, J.D., CHAPPEL, J,R., ALLEN, S.G., BOURKE, A.J. and ROGERSON, A.G. (:1977): The effects of igG2 and of antigen concentration on in the Complement-fixation test for bovine brucellosis. Research in Veterinary Science 22, 194-197.
  8. MORGAN, W.J. BRINLEY, (.1967): The serological Diaghosis of Bovine Brucellosis. Veterinary Record Vol. 80, 612-624.
  9. PLACKET, P., COTTEW, G. and BEST, S. {;1976): An Indırect Haemolysis test (IHLT) for Bovine Brucellosis. Anstralian Veterinary Journal Vol. 52, March, 136-140. Rev. SeL Tech. off. Int. Epiz. (ı1985): 4(2), 315-323. Rev. Sci. Tech. off. Int. Epiz. ('1986): 5(3). 605-618.
  10. SARISAYIN, F., EROGLU, M. (11 964): Brucellosisin serolojik teşhisinde yeni bir metod olan coombs (antiglobulin) testin uygulanması. Türk Vet. Hek. Derg. 34, (9-10) 386-396.
  11. SARISAYIN, F., EROGLU, M. (1969): Brucellosisin serolojik te