SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Investigation of Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Transfer of Knowledge of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics to Daily Life

Fizik Öğretmen Adaylarının Termodinamiğin Birinci ve İkinci Yasalarına İlişkin Bilgilerini Günlük Yaşama Aktarma Durumlarının İncelenmesi

Sevim Bezen(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0304-5314
Celal Bayrak(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9269-2029
Pages
275–293
Publication Date
2025-03-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This way, pre-service teachers' knowledge can be structured, and transferring it to daily life can be supported.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated how pre-service physics teachers transfer their knowledge of the first and second laws of thermodynamics to daily life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study participants consisted of 63 pre-service teachers studying in the Department of Physics Education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This way, pre-service teachers' knowledge can be structured, and transferring it to daily life can be supported.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fizik eğitimi · Günlük hayat · Öğretmen adayları

Abstract

This study investigated how pre-service physics teachers transfer their knowledge of the first and second laws of thermodynamics to daily life. A case study, which is a qualitative research method, was utilised. The study participants consisted of 63 pre-service teachers studying in the Department of Physics Education. Criterion sampling, one of the purposeful sampling methods, was used in selecting participants. The data were collected through an ‘opinion form’ with seven open-ended questions. The data were analyzed within the framework of deductive content analysis. As a result of the research, it was determined that pre-service physics teachers had problems transferring their knowledge of the first and second laws of thermodynamics to daily life. It is thought that the source of this problem is the inability of pre-service teachers to understand basic concepts such as work, heat, enthalpy and entropy, and therefore, the failure of pre-service teachers to transfer their knowledge to daily life in a scientifically correct way due to the deficiencies in their prior knowledge. Because it is known that at the point where scientific knowledge is transferred to daily life, it is necessary to make sense of the knowledge first; to overcome this problem identified in the research, it can be suggested to create a learning environment enriched with various teaching methods, techniques and strategies. This way, pre-service teachers' knowledge can be structured, and transferring it to daily life can be supported.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, fizik öğretmen adaylarının termodinamiğin birinci ve ikinci yasalarına ilişkin bilgilerini günlük hayata nasıl aktardıkları araştırılmıştır. Nitel bir araştırma yöntemi olan durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları Fizik Eğitimi Anabilim Dalında öğrenim gören 63 öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Katılımcıların seçiminde amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden biri olan ölçüt örnekleme kullanılmıştır. Veriler, yedi açık uçlu sorudan oluşan bir 'görüş formu' aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Veriler tümdengelimli içerik analizi çerçevesinde analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda fizik öğretmen adaylarının termodinamiğin birinci ve ikinci yasalarına ilişkin bilgilerini günlük hayata aktarmada sorun yaşadıkları tespit edilmiştir. Bu sorunun kaynağının öğretmen adaylarının iş, ısı, entalpi ve entropi gibi temel kavramları anlayamamaları ve dolayısıyla öğretmen adaylarının ön bilgilerindeki eksiklikler nedeniyle bilgilerini bilimsel olarak doğru bir şekilde günlük hayata aktaramamaları olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bilimsel bilginin günlük hayata aktarılması noktasında öncelikle bilginin anlamlandırılması gerektiği bilindiğinden; araştırmada tespit edilen bu sorunu aşmak için çeşitli öğretim yöntem, teknik ve stratejileri ile zenginleştirilmiş bir öğrenme ortamı oluşturulması önerilebilir. Bu şekilde öğretmen adaylarının bilgileri yapılandırılabilir ve günlük hayata aktarılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bezen, S., Bayrak, C. (2025). Investigation of Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Transfer of Knowledge of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics to Daily Life. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1549530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (41)

  1. Asih, F. E., Poedjiastoeti, S., Lutf, A., Novita, D., Ismono, I., & Purnamasar, A. P. (2022). The practicality and effectiveness of case study-based module on chemical thermodynamics course (ideal and real gases) as learning tool during the COVID-19 pandemic. JOTSE, 12(2), 466-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1654
  2. Awudi, B., & Danso, S. (2023). Improving students’ performance and conceptual understanding of heat transfer using demonstration method. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), em037. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13164
  3. Bajracharya, R. R., Emigh, J. P., & Manogue, A. C. (2019). Students’ strategies for solving a multirepresentational partial derivative problem in thermodynamics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020124, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020124
  4. Baran, M., & Sozbilir, M. (2018). An application of context-and problem-based learning (C-PBL) into teaching thermodynamics. Research in Science Education, 48, 663-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9583-1
  5. Brown, B., & Singh, C. (2021). Student understanding of the first law and second law of thermodynamics. European Journal of Physics, 42(6), 065702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac18b4
  6. Brown, B., & Singh, C. (2022). Student understanding of thermodynamic processes, variables and systems. European Journal of Physics, 43(5), 055705. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac7af2
  7. Budi Bhakti, Y., Agustina Dwi Astuti, I., & Prasetya, R. (2022). Four-tier thermodynamics diagnostic test (4T-TDT) to identify student misconception. KnE Social Sciences, 7(14), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i14.11958
  8. Cochran, M. (2005). Student understanding of the second law of thermodynamics and the underlying concepts of heat, temperature, and thermal equilibrium [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington, USA.
  9. Cochran, M., & Heron, P. (2006). Development and assessment of research-based tutorials on heat engines and the second law of thermodynamics. Am. J. Phys. 74, 734-741. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2198889
  10. Cotignola, M. I., Bordogna, C., Punte, G. ve Cappannini, O. M. (2002). Difficulties in learning thermodynamic concepts: Are they linked to the historical development of this field?. Science & Education, 11, 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205123254
  11. Cengel, A. Y., & Boles, A. M. (2011). Thermodynamics: An engineering approach (Seventh edition in SI units). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  12. Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00007f
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Emrahoglu, N. & Mengi, F. (2012). An investigation of 8th grade primary school students’ level of transferring science and technology topics into everyday life problem solving. Journal of Cukurova University Instute of Social Sciences, 21(1), 213-228.
  15. Engström, S., & Norström, P. (2022). How physics courses can make highly valued strategies and dispositions visible to physics teacher students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 396-411. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12078
  16. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Halim, A. S., Kasner, G., Wilhelm, C. A., Moon, A., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2020). Capturing student conceptions of thermodynamics and kinetics using writing. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 922-939. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00292H
  17. Haglund, J. (2017). Good use of a ‘Bad’ metaphor. Science & Education, 26, 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9892-4
  18. Kautz, C., Heron, P., Loverude, M., & McDermott L. (2005). Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part I: A macroscopic perspective. Am. J. Phys. 73, 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2049286
  19. Kirtak Ad, V. N., & Demirci, N. (2013). Physics, chemistry and biology teacher candidates' level of application of the second law of thermodynamics to daily events. Turkish Science Education and Research Association, 1(2), 67-80.
  20. Kleidon, A. (2023). Working at the limit: A review of thermodynamics and optimality of the Earth system. Earth System Dynamics, 14(4), 861-896. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-861-2023
  21. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
  22. Kõlamets, L., Kasuk, H., Holbrook, J., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2023). The relevance of learning outcomes included in Estonian grade 7-9 science subject curricula associated with the concept of energy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.653
  23. Kulkarni, V. D., & Tambade, P. S. (2013). Enhancing the learning of thermodynamics using computer-assisted instructions at undergraduate level. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 5(1), 2-10.
  24. Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1417532
  25. Meltzer, D. (2004). Investigation of students’ reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course. Am. J. Phys., 72(11), 1432-1446. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1789161
  26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edition). California: Sage.
  27. Pandey, J. (2019). Deductive approach to content analysis. In Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis (pp. 145-169). IGI Global.
  28. Partanen, L., Hanninen, V., & Halonen, L. (2016). Effects of global and local anharmonicities on the thermodynamic properties of sulfuric acid monohydrate. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 12(11), 5511-5524. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00683
  29. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage.
  30. Sasmaz Oren, F., & Sahin, F. (2023). An inquiry and context-based activity supporting lifelong learning: Enzymes in daily life. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 5(1), 336-362. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1281528
  31. Shahsavari, S., & Boutorabi, S. M. A. (2023). Energy structure theory: A general unified thermodynamics theory. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 26(3), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1257725
  32. Singh, M. S., & O’Neill, M. E. (2022). The climate system and the second law of thermodynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(1), 015001. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015001
  33. Smith, T., Christensen, W., Mountcastle, D., & Thompson, J. (2015). Identifying student difficulties with heat engines, entropy, and the carnot cycle. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020116
  34. Stroumpouli, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2022). Chemistry students’ conceptual difficulties and problem solving behavior in chemical kinetics, as a component of an introductory physical chemistry course. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0005
  35. Şahin, Ö., & Danaci, D. (2022). Investigating the effect of history-of mathematics activities on middle-grade students’ mental computation and opinions: An action research. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(9), 2281-2318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1857859
  36. Ultay, E., Durukan, U. G., & Ultay, N. (2021). Determination of prospective science teachers' level of knowledge about thermodynamics and their reasoning with daily life examples. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 298-308. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3.29544
  37. Vieira, C., Magana, A. J., García, R. E., Jana, A., & Krafcik, M. (2018). Integrating computational science tools into a thermodynamics course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9726-9
  38. Yalçın, O. & Emrahoğlu, N. (2017). Examining the high school students’ transfer levels of modern physics topics to daily life. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 7(1), 115-158, http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.005
  39. Yildiz, A. (2022). Pre-service teachers' levels of understanding the light-related concepts. World Journal of Education, 12(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n4p1
  40. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). California: Sage.
  41. Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2008). University Physics (Vol. I: Pearson). Boston: Addison Wesley.