SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Reflexivity in qualitative research: The role of the researcher

Nitel araştırmalarda yansıtıcılık: Araştırmacının rolü

Nihan Demirkasımoğlu(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8609-9985
Sevim Bezen(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0304-5314
Pages
770–788
Publication Date
2024-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the paper provides the researchers clear examples and guidelines that could facilitate a more effective and impactful application of reflexivity, ultimately enriching the research process and contributing to more nuanced and credible research outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study examines reflexivity in qualitative research, underscoring its vital role in allowing researchers to critically explore their influence and the interplay between their subjectivity and the research process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A thorough literature review within the article reveals a variety of definitions and applications of reflexivity across disciplines, highlighting its complexity and the need for a nuanced application in research practices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the paper provides the researchers clear examples and guidelines that could facilitate a more effective and impactful application of reflexivity, ultimately enriching the research process and contributing to more nuanced and credible research outcomes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yansıtıcılık · Araştırma Öznelliği · Araştırmacı Etkisi

Abstract

The study examines reflexivity in qualitative research, underscoring its vital role in allowing researchers to critically explore their influence and the interplay between their subjectivity and the research process. A thorough literature review within the article reveals a variety of definitions and applications of reflexivity across disciplines, highlighting its complexity and the need for a nuanced application in research practices. Addressing the inherent challenges and ethical considerations in qualitative research, the article champions reflexivity as a means to enhance the validity and authenticity of research findings. It advocates for the integration of reflexive practices throughout the research process, from conceptualization to data analysis, to promote accountability and transparency. In conclusion, the paper provides the researchers clear examples and guidelines that could facilitate a more effective and impactful application of reflexivity, ultimately enriching the research process and contributing to more nuanced and credible research outcomes.

Özet

Bu çalışma, nitel araştırmada yansıtıcılığı incelemekte ve araştırmacıların kendi etkilerini ve öznellikleri ile araştırma süreci arasındaki etkileşimi eleştirel bir şekilde keşfetmelerine olanak sağlamadaki hayati rolünün altını çizmektedir. Makalede yapılan kapsamlı literatür taraması, yansıtıcılığın disiplinler arasında çeşitli tanım ve uygulamalarını ortaya koymakta, karmaşıklığını ve araştırma uygulamalarında farklılaşabilen nüanslara duyulan ihtiyacı vurgulamaktadır. Nitel araştırmanın doğasında var olan zorlukları ve etik hususları ele alan çalışmada, araştırma bulgularının geçerliliğini ve özgünlüğünü artırmanın bir yolu olarak yansıtıcılığın önemini vurgulamaktadır. Hesap verebilirliği ve şeffaflığı teşvik etmek için kavramsallaştırmadan veri analizine kadar araştırma süreci boyunca yansıtıcılığın uygulamalara entegre edilmesini savunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak çalışma, araştırmacılara yansıtıcılığın daha etkili bir şekilde uygulanmasını kolaylaştırabilecek, nihayetinde araştırma sürecini zenginleştirecek ve daha incelikli ve güvenilir araştırma sonuçlarına katkıda bulunacak açık örnekler ve kılavuzlar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirkasımoğlu, N., Bezen, S. (2024). Reflexivity in qualitative research: The role of the researcher. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 770–788. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1464026

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (76)

  1. Altheide, D., & Johnson, M. (1998). Criteria for accessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Collecting & Interpreting Qualitative Material. Sage, 283-312.
  2. Akom, A. A. (2008). Black metropolis and mental life: Beyond the “burden of ‘acting white’” toward a third wave of critical racial studies. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 39(3), 247–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l548-1492.2008.00020.x.
  3. Anderson, G. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 249–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170182
  4. Barrett, A, Kajamaa, A., & Johnston, J. (2020). How to. be reflexive when conducting qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13133.
  5. Baskoro, F., Suprianto, B., Anifah, L., & Indriyani, Y. A. (2023). Beyond Smart Devices: Fostering Critical, Communication and Collaborative Thinking in IoT-Based Sensor and Actuator Competence Learning Outcomes. TEM Journal, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM124-52
  6. Beals, F., Kidman, J., & Funaki, H. (2020). Insider and outsider research: Negotiating self at the edge of the emic/etic divide. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 593-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419843950
  7. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin Books Ltd
  8. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative research, 15(2), 219-234.
  9. Bieler, P., Bister, M. D., Hauer, J., Klausner, M., Niewöhner, J., Schmid, C., & von Peter, S. (2021). Distributing reflexivity through co-laborative ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620968271
  10. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
  11. Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism. Routledge.
  12. Burns, E., Fenwick, J., Schmied, V., & Sheehan, A. (2012). Reflexivity in midwifery research: the insider/outsider debate. Midwifery, 28(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.018
  13. Colyar, J. (2009). Becoming writing, becoming writers. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(2), 421–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318280
  14. Cunliffe, A. L. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity-A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608099315
  15. Darawsheh, W. (2014). Reflexivity in research: promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 21(12), 560-568. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.560
  16. Deggs, D., & Hernandez, F. (2018). Enhancing the value of qualitative field notes through purposeful reflection. The Qualitative Report, 23(10), 2552-2560. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Enhancing-the-Value-of-Qualitative-Field-Notes-Deggs-Hernandez/859881f21a9a6cac546c4d76d08fa4a2838e8126?p2df
  17. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
  18. Dodgson, J. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990
  19. Dowling, M. (2006). Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse researcher, 13(3), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2006.04.13.3.7.c5975
  20. Eide, P., & Kahn, D. (2008). Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher—participant relationship. Nursing Ethics, 15(2), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733007086018
  21. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). The Handbook of Qualitative Research, 733-768. Sage.
  22. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. The University of Chicago Press.
  23. Finefter-Rosenbluh, I. (2017). Incorporating Perspective Taking in Reflexivity: A Method to Enhance Insider Qualitative Research Processes. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917703539
  24. Finlay, L. (2002a). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
  25. Finlay, L. (2002b). "Outing" the researcher: The provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
  26. Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Eds.). (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470776094
  27. Finlay, L. (2017). Championing “reflexivities”. Qualitative Psychology, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000075
  28. Gentles, S. J., Jack, S. M., Nicholas, D. B., & McKibbon, K. A. (2014). Critical Approach to Reflexivity in Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report, 19(44), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1109
  29. Gewirtz, S., & Cribb, A. (2006). What to do about values in social research: The case for ethical reflexivity in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(2), 141–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690600556081
  30. Gordon, J. (2005). White on white: Researcher reflexivity and the logics of privilege in white schools undertaking reform. The Urban Review, 37(4), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-005-0015-1
  31. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative inquiry, 10(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
  32. Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon press. Haraway, D. (2016). ‘Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective'. In Space, gender, knowledge: Feminist readings (pp. 53-72). Routledge.
  33. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Cornell University Press.
  34. Henwood, K. (2008). Qualitative research, reflexivity and living with risk: Valuing and practicing epistemic reflexivity and centering marginality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701863575
  35. Hinz, S. E. (2016). Upwardly mobile: Attitudes toward the class transition among first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(3), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0033
  36. Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality - A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research - A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
  37. Jootun, D., McGhee, G., & Marland, G. R. (2009). Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 23(23), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2009.02.23.23.42.c6800
  38. Kleinsasser, A. M. (2000). Researchers, reflexivity, and good data: Writing to unlearn. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_6
  39. Koch, T., & Harrington, A. (1998). Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity. Journal of advanced nursing, 28(4), 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00725.x
  40. Kom, C., Sharpe, D., & Owens, M. (2023). Reflexivity in context: Navigating the challenges of conducting qualitative research in international business. In: BAM2023 Conference proceedings. British Academy of Management.
  41. Koopman, W. J., Watling, C. J., & LaDonna, K. A. (2020). Autoethnography as a strategy for engaging in reflexivity. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 7, 2333393620970508. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393620970508
  42. Kuehner, A., Ploder, A., & Langer, P. C. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue: European Contributions to Strong Reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416658069
  43. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x
  44. Leggatt-Cook, C., Sheridan, J., Madden, H., Cain, T., Munro, R., Tse, S. C., Jeon, H., & Chamberlain K. (2011). Collective Reflexivity: Researchers in Play, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(3), 223-246, https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903370064
  45. Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2021). Of wine and whiteboards: Enacting feminist reflexivity in collaborative research. Qualitative Research, 21(5), 719-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120946988
  46. Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17, 26–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202
  47. Macbeth, D. (2001). On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 35–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700103
  48. Malterud K. (2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet (London, England), 358(9280), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
  49. Marcus, G. E. (1994). What comes (just) after “post”? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 563–574). Sage.
  50. Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2019). Grounded theory methodology and self-reflexivity in the qualitative research process. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory. Sage, 470–496.
  51. Moss, P. A. (2005). Toward “epistemic reflexivity” in educational research: A response to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00453.x
  52. Naidu, T., & Sliep, Y. (2011). Contextual Reflexivity: Towards Contextually Relevant Research with South African HIV/AIDS Home-Based Care Volunteers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(4), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000409
  53. Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
  54. Olmos-Vega, F. M., Dolmans, D. H., Guzmán-Quintero, C., Stalmeijer, R. E., & Teunissen, P. W. (2018). Unravelling residents' and supervisors' workplace interactions: an intersubjectivity study. Medical education, 52(7), 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13603
  55. Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical teacher, 45(3), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
  56. Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93-96. https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  57. Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure: The use of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
  58. Pillow, W. S. (2010). Dangerous reflexivity: Rigour, responsibility and reflexivity in qualitative research. The Routledge Doctoral Student’s Companion. Routledge.
  59. Rees C. E., Crampton P. E. S., & Monrouxe L. V. (2020). Re-visioning academic medicine through a constructionist lens. Academic Medicine, 95(6), 846–850. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003109.
  60. Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A. C., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2
  61. Rettke, H., Pretto, M., Spichiger, E., Anna Frei, I., & Spirig, R. (2018). Using reflexive thinking to establish rigor in qualitative research. Nursing Research, 67(6), 490-497. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000307.
  62. Russell, G. M., & Kelly, N. H. (2002). Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.831
  63. Salim, H., Susilawati, S., & Hanif, M. (2021). Reflective writing in the pandemic period: A university students’ reflection. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 56-65. http://doi.org/10.31681/ jetol.834129
  64. Schwandt, T. A. (2014). The sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage.
  65. Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2017). Raising the curtain: The importance of transparency in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 4, 126–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000062
  66. Smith, S. (2006). Encouraging the use of reflexivity in the writing up of qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13(5), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.5.21377
  67. Van Maanen, J. (1989). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
  68. Varpio, L., & MacLeod, A. (2020). Philosophy of science series: Harnessing the multidisciplinary edge effect by exploring paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, and methodologies. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 686–689. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003142
  69. Varpio, L., O’Brien, B., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L., Ajjawi, R., & Paradis, E. (2021). The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education’s research. Medical Education, 55(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14348
  70. Wacquant, L. J., & Bourdieu, P. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity.
  71. Walsh, R. (2003). The methods of reflexivity. The Humanistic Psychologist, 31(4), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2003.9986934
  72. Wasserfall, R. (1997). Reflexivity, feminism, and difference. In R. Hertz (Ed.). Reflexivity and voice. Sage.
  73. Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 493–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6
  74. Williams, A. (1990). Reading feminism in fieldnotes. In L. Stanley (Ed.). Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory, & Epistemology in Feminist Sociology. Routledge.
  75. Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Open University Press.
  76. Barrett, A, Kajamaa, A., & Johnston, J. (2020). How to. be reflexive when conducting qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13133.