SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

The Effect of Leader-Member Exchange on Innovative Work Behavior: A Research on Mediator Role of Career Satisfaction and Moderator Role of Sector Experience

Sefa Ceyhan(NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ, İDARİ VE SOSYAL BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3788-0756
Hüseyin Çiçek(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8284-7955
Pages
89–106
Publication Date
2024-01-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it is among the findings obtained from the research that the indirect effect of LMX on IWB through career satisfaction varies depending on low and high sector experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research aimed to determine the moderating role of industry experience on the indirect effect of leader-member interaction (LMX) on innovative work behavior (IWB) through career satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data set of 302 people obtained during the field research was analysed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is among the findings obtained from the research that the indirect effect of LMX on IWB through career satisfaction varies depending on low and high sector experience.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lider-Üye Etkileşimi · Yenilikçi İş Davranışı · Kariyer Tatmini

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the moderating role of industry experience on the indirect effect of leader-member interaction (LMX) on innovative work behavior (IWB) through career satisfaction. The research was carried out in textile enterprises located in Denizli organized industrial zones, which is the favourite textile production region of Turkey. The data set of 302 people obtained during the field research was analysed. As a result of the related analysis, it has been found that employees with high industry experience are less satisfied with their careers compared to employees with low industry experience. In addition, it is among the findings obtained from the research that the indirect effect of LMX on IWB through career satisfaction varies depending on low and high sector experience.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, lider-üye etkileşiminin (LÜE) kariyer tatmini aracılığıyla yenilikçi iş davranışı (YID) üzerindeki dolaylı etkisinde sektör deneyiminin düzenleyici rolünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma, Türkiye'nin gözde tekstil üretim bölgesini oluşturan ve Denizli ili organize sanayi bölgelerinde yer alan tekstil işletmelerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Alan araştırması sırasında elde edilen 302 kişilik veri seti analize tabi tutulmuştur. İlgili analizler sonucunda, sektör deneyimi yüksek çalışanların, düşük sektör deneyimine sahip çalışanlara kıyasla kariyerlerinden daha az tatmin olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Ayrıca, LÜE'nin kariyer tatmini aracılığıyla YID üzerindeki dolaylı etkisinin düşük ve yüksek sektör deneyimine bağlı olarak değişim gösterdiği araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular arasındadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ceyhan, S., Çiçek, H. (2024). The Effect of Leader-Member Exchange on Innovative Work Behavior: A Research on Mediator Role of Career Satisfaction and Moderator Role of Sector Experience. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1274113

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (88)

  1. Abdillah, M.R. (2021). Leader humor and knowledge sharing behavior: The role of leader-member exchange. Jurnal Manajemen, 25(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v25i1.704
  2. Ahmad, M.S., Khan, M.M., & Iqbal, N. (2021). Career satisfaction and innovative behavior. Journal of ISOSS, 7(2), 99–124.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  4. Akçakanat, T., Uzunbacak, H.H., Özdemir, S., & Karadeniz, G. (2018). “Lider-üye etkileşimi ile yenilikçi iş davranışı arasındaki ilişkide algılanan örgütsel desteğin ve işe adanmışlığın rolü”, 6. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. (2-3 Kasım).
  5. Akkoç, İ. (2012). Gelişim kültürü ve etik iklimin yenilikçiliğe etkisinde dağıtım adaletinin rolü. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 45-60.
  6. Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Cameron, S. (2005). Factors related to the career satisfaction of older managerial and professional woman. Career Development International, 10(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430510598328
  7. Amoah, V.S., Annor, F., & Asumeng, M. (2021). Psychological contract breach and teachers’ organizational commitment: mediating roles of job embeddedness and leader-member exchange. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(5), 634-649. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2020-0201
  8. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  9. Avcı, U., & Turunç, Ö. (2012). Dönüşümcü liderlik ve örgüte güvenin kariyer memnuniyetine etkisi: Lider-üye etkileşiminin aracılık rolü. Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 45-55.
  10. Baş, T., Keskin, N., & Mert, İ.S. (2010). Lider üye etkileşimi (lüe) modeli ve ölçme aracının türkçede geçerlik ve güvenilirlik analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 10(3), 1013–1013. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2010319626
  11. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  12. Bibi, A., & Afsar, B. (2018). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation, psychological empowerment, and creative process engagement. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics, and Business, 18(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.15208/pieb.2018.3
  13. Blau, P.M. (1968). Social exchange. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 7, 452–457.
  14. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., & Van Den Heuvel, M. (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2013-0088
  15. Ceyhan, S., Gönüllü, H., Çiçek, H., & Bektaş, M. (2020). Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin iş tatminine etkisi: Burdur ilinde bir araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 27(1). 129-142. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.545762
  16. Çankır, B. & Alkan, D.P. (2018). Lider-üye etkileşiminin örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisinde dağıtım adaletinin aracılık rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3), 929–949. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2018.507
  17. Çalışkan, A. (2013). İç odaklı örgüt kültürünün yenilikçi davranışa etkisinde personel güçlendirmenin aracılık rolü. Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 15(1), 88-112. https://doi.org/10.4026/1303-2860.2013.0221.x
  18. Cem, I., & Aydın, E. (2016). Bilgi paylaşımının yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisi: Ayder yaylası konaklama işletmeleri üzerine bir uygulama. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 5(2), 75–103.
  19. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
  20. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
  21. Deluga, R.J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00570.x
  22. Demirdelen, D., & Ulama, Ş. (2013). Demografik değişkenlerin kariyer tatminine etkileri: Antalya’da 5 yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 1(2), 65–89.
  23. Dienesch, R., & Liden, R. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3) 618-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/258314
  24. Durmuş, K. (2019). Lider-üye etkileşiminin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü: Türk ihas sektörü (Yayın Nu. 563049) [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi] https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  25. Emilie, H. (2007). What “career success” means to blue-collar workers. Career Development International, 12(6), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710822029
  26. Eren, S.S., & Ayas, N. (2012). Hizmet odaklılığın kavramsal çerçevesi. International Journal of Economic & Social Research, 8(8), 155-181.
  27. Erkutlu, H.V. (2014). Liderlik, kuramlar ve yeni bakış açıları (1. Baskı). Efil Yayınevi.
  28. Evers, A. & Sieverding, M. (2015). Academic career intention beyond the PhD: Can the theory of planned behavior explain gender differences? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(3), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12285
  29. Gattiker, U.E., & Larwood, L. (1986). Subjective career success: A study of managers and support personnel. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01018805
  30. Graen, G.B., Liden, R.C., & Hoel, W. (1973a). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 868-872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.868
  31. Graen, G.B., Orris, J.B., & Johnson, T.W. (1973b). Role assimilation processes in a complex organization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3(4), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(73)90053-5
  32. Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. research in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
  33. Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  34. Greenhaus, J.H., Callanan, G.A., & Godshalk, V.M. (2010). Career management. Sage Publications.
  35. Greenhaus, J.H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W.M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/256352
  36. Gronhaug, K., & Kaufmann, G. (Eds.) (1988). From individual creativity to organizational innovation. Norwegian University Press.
  37. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
  38. Gün, G. (2018). Örgüt kültürü tiplerinin kariyer tatminine etkisinde lider-üye etkileşiminin aracılık etkisi: Tekstil işletmelerinde bir uygulama. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18(35), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.348253
  39. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results, and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
  40. Hayes, A.F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
  41. He, G., Zhang, S., Cai, Y., & Jia, L. (2022). A self-categorization perspective on individual-teammates congruence in leader-member exchange quality and individual performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1931131
  42. Hochwarter, W. A., Kiewitz, C., Gundlach, M. J., & Stoner, J. (2004). The impact of vocational and social efficacy on job performance and career satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(3), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190401000303
  43. Huck, J., Whyatt, D., & Coulton, P. (2012). Challenges in geocoding socially-generated data. In Proceedings of the GIS Research UK 20th Annual Conference (pp. 39-45).
  44. Judge, T.A., Cable, D.M., Boudreau, J.W., & Bretz Jr, R.D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 485–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x
  45. Kalaycı, G., Albayrak, S.A., Eroğlu, A., Küçüksille, E., & Ak, B. (2005). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  46. Kalkınma Ajansları Genel Müdürlüğü. (2021). Sanayi ve teknoloji bakanlığı. Retrieved from https://www.yatirimadestek.gov.tr/sozluk/brownfield-investment, On March 19, 2021.
  47. Karatepe, O.M. (2011). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and performance outcomes: A study of hotel employees in cameron. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(5), 735-752. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111211237273
  48. Kaptangil, İ. (2021). Lider üye etkileşim kalitesinde üyelerin kişilik özelliklerinin rolü: Ankara’da özel bir hastane örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1175
  49. Kelebek, E.E., & Alnıaçık, E. (2022). Effects of leader-member exchange, organizational identification and leadership communication on unethical pro-organizational behavior: a study on bank employees in turkey. Sustainability, 14(3), 1055-1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031055
  50. Kılınç, A.Ç., Polatcan, M., Atmaca, T., & Koşar, M. (2020). Öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesinin yordayıcıları olarak öğretmen öz yeterliliği ve bireysel akademik iyimserlik: Bir yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Türk Eğitim Derneği Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 46(205), 1-22.
  51. Kılınç, M., Tortumlu, M., & Uzun, K. (2021). Öğretmenlerin kariyer tatmini düzeylerinin demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(24), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.819500
  52. Klein, I., & Fischer, M. (2006). Skewness by splitting the scale parameter. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 35(7), 1159-1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920600692730
  53. Köse, S.K. (2012). “Korelasyon ve regresyon analizi”, Türk Toraks Derneği 8. Yıllık Kongresi, (27 Nisan).
  54. LaFaver, K., Miyasaki, J.M., Keran, C.M., Rheaume, C., Gulya, L., Levin, K.H., Jones, E.C., Schwarz, H.B., Molano, J.R., & Hessler, A. (2018). Age and sex differences in burnout, career satisfaction, and well-being in us neurologists. Neurology, 91(20), 1928–1941. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006497
  55. Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., & Sparrowe, R.T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
  56. Liden, R., & Maslyn, J. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400105
  57. Martins, L.L., Eddleston, K.A., & Veiga, J.F. (2002). Moderators of the relationship between work-family conflict and career satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069354
  58. Maslyn, J.M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other’s effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.697
  59. Mete, E.S., Sökmen, A., & Sökmen, A. (2021). The relationship between leader-member exchange, innovative work behaviour and career satisfaction: A research in hotel enterprises. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 9(2), 638–659. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2021.807
  60. Michael. H.J., Guo, G.Z., Wiedenbeck, K.J., & Ray, D.C. (2006). Production supervisor impacts on subordinates’ safety outcomes: An investigation of leader-member exchange and safety communication. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.06.004
  61. Ng, T.W., Eby, L.T., Sorensen, K.L., & Feldman, D.C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
  62. Oldham, G.R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
  63. Örücü, E., Gi̇zli̇er, Ö., & Yılmaz, A. (2020). Lider-üye etkileşiminin çalışanların inovatif davranışları üzerindeki etkisi: izmir’deki sigorta acentelerinde bir araştırma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 32, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.749289
  64. Özçelik, A.O., Sadullah, Ö., Uyargil, C., Acar, A.C., Dündar, G.İ., Atay, İ.D., Adal, Z., & Tüzüner, V.L. (2018). İnsan kaynakları yönetimi (8. Baskı): İ.Ü. İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı Öğretim Üyeleri. Beta Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
  65. Özden, S. (2019). Sağlıklı gıda tüketiminde sağlık bilinci ve tutumun aracı rolünün hayes’in proses makrosu ile incelenmesi (Yayın Nu. 554686) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi] https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  66. Pan, J., Chiu, C.Y., & Wu, K.S. (2021). Leader-member exchange fosters nurses’ job and life satisfaction: the mediating effect of job crafting. Plos One, 16(4), 114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250789
  67. Patton, W. & McMahon, M. (2006). The systems theory framework of career development and counseling: Connecting theory and practice. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 28(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-005-9010-1
  68. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  69. Peluchette, J.v.E. (1993). Subjective career success: the influence of individual difference, family, and organizational variables. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1042
  70. Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D., & Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
  71. Purwanto, A., Purba, J.T., Sijabat, R., & Bernarto, I. (2021). The role of transformational leadership, organizational citizenship behaviour, innovative work behaviour, quality work life, digital transformation and leader member exchange on universities performance. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 2, 2908-2932.
  72. Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J., & Lirtzman, S.I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486
  73. Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  74. Sa’adah, N., & Rijanti, T. (2022). The role of knowledge sharing, leader-member exchange (lmx) on organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance: an empirical study on public health center of pati 1, pati 2 and trangkil in central java. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(1), 112–131.
  75. Soydan, N.T., (2021). Algılanan kurumsal destek, lider-üye etkileşimi, öz-yeterlilik ve kariyer tatmini ilişkisi (Yayın Nu. 699918) [Doktora tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi] https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  76. Spurk, D., Hofer, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2021). Why does competitive psychological climate foster or hamper career success? the role of challenge and hindrance pathways and leader-member-exchange. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103542
  77. Suwanti, S., Udin, U., & Widodo, W. (2018). Person-organization fit, person-job fit, and innovative work behavior: the role of organizational citizenship behavior. European Research Studies, 21, 389–402. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/178
  78. Seçer, İ. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinde okul tükenmişliği ile psikolojik uyumsuzluk arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(1), 81-99.
  79. Taşlıyan, M., Arı, N.Ü., & Duzman, B. (2011). İnsan kaynakları yönetiminde kariyer planlama ve kariyer yönetimi: İibf öğrencileri üzerinde bir alan araştırması. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 231–241.
  80. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013) B.G. Tabachnick, L.S. Fidell using multivariate statistics (sixth ed.) Pearson: Boston.
  81. Terzis, V., & Economides, A.A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer-based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4): 1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
  82. Ulukök, E., & Akın, A. (2016). İşkoliklik ve kariyer tatmini. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(2), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.55
  83. Yap, M., Cukier, W., Holmes, M., & Hannan, C.A. (2010). Career satisfaction: a look behind the races. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 65(4), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.7202/045587ar
  84. Yıldız, T., & Aykanat, Z. (2016). Karizmatik liderlik ve örgütsel yenilikçilik ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 11(2), 198-228.
  85. Yu, Y., & Yang, G. (2022). Zhongyong thinking, leader–member exchange, and employee innovative behavior. Social behavior and personality. An International Journal, 50(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10986
  86. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R.W. (2017). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
  87. Zhou, X., Rasool, S.F., Yang, J., & Asghar, M.Z. (2021). Exploring the relationship between despotic leadership and job satisfaction: The role of self efficacy and leader–member exchange. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5307-5327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105307
  88. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J.G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257