SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Smartphone Addiction and the Use of Social Media among University Students

Yasemin Sanal Özcan(ADANA BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Ömer Ozer
Pages
367–377
Publication Date
2017-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis of the results showed that 28.8 percent of girls and 32.1 percent of boys were above the cut-off points.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of smartphone addiction, using the Smartphone Addiction Scale – Short Version (SAS-SV) among English language preparatory year students in a state university.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It also aimed to determine which mobile applications are more popular among the participants. 164 students were given questionnaires, but seven were eliminated as not owning a smartphone.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis of the results showed that 28.8 percent of girls and 32.1 percent of boys were above the cut-off points.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Smartphone Addiction · Social Media Use · Behavioral Addictions

Özet

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of smartphone addiction, using the Smartphone Addiction Scale – Short Version (SAS-SV) among English language preparatory year students in a state university. It also aimed to determine which mobile applications are more popular among the participants. 164 students were given questionnaires, but seven were eliminated as not owning a smartphone. Statistical analysis was run for 157 students, of which 73 were girls and 84 boys, with an average age of 18.94. The analysis of the results showed that 28.8 percent of girls and 32.1 percent of boys were above the cut-off points. This constitutes 30.6% of the total participants that were among the risk group. There was no significant difference found based on gender, place of living or field of study. WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and Snapchat were the most popular applications as over 50 percent of the participants used them. Study implications and future research directions were discussed

🔖

Cite This Article

Özcan, Y. S., Ozer, Ö. (2017). Smartphone Addiction and the Use of Social Media among University Students. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 367–377. https://ajindex.com/articles/1358515

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abu-Jedy A. (2008). “Mobile Phone Addiction and Its Relationship with Self-Disclosure Among Sample of Students from University of Jordan and Amman Al-Ahliyya University”. Jordan Journal of Educational Science 4/2 (2008) 137-50.
  2. Agcadağ İ. (2014). “Sanal Alışveriş”. MJH 4/1 (2014). Doi: 10.13114/MJH.201416420
  3. Allen R. (2017, February). “Top Social Network Sites by Number of Active Users 2017”. Retrieved April 09, 2017, from http://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/attachment/top-social-network-sites-by-number-of-active-users-2017/
  4. Bakker D., Kazantis N., Rickwood D. & Rickard N. (2016). “Mental Health Smartphone Apps: Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Future Developments”. JMIR Mental Health 3/1 (2016). doi: 10.2196/mental.4984
  5. Barkana Y., Zadok D., Morad Y. & Avni I. (2004). Visual Field Attention Is Reduced by Concomitant Hands-Free Conversation on a Cellular Telephone. American Journal of Ophthalmology 138/3 (2004) 347-353.
  6. Bianchi A. & Phillips J. G. (2005). “Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use”. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 8/1 (2005) 39-51.
  7. Cain N. & Gradisar M. (2010). “Electronic Media Use and Sleep in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Review”. Sleep Medicine 11/8 (2010) 735-742. Doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.02.006
  8. Choliz M. (2010). “Mobile Phone Addiction: A Point of Issue”. Addiction 105/2 (2010) 373-374. Doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02854.
  9. Noyan C. O., Enez Darcin A., Kose S., Nurmedov S., Yılmaz O. & Dilbaz N. (2016). “Smartphone Addiction and Its Relationship with Social Anxiety and Loneliness”. Behavior & Information Technology 35/7 (2016) 520-525.
  10. Emanuel R., Bell R., Cotton C., Craig J., Drummond D., Gibson S., Harris A., Harris M., Hatcher-Vance C., Jones S. & Lewis J. (2015). “The Truth about Smartphone Addiction”. College Student Journal 49/2 (2015) 291-299.
  11. Farley H., Angela M., Johnson C., Carter B., Lane M., Midgley W., Hafeez-Baig A., Dekeyser S. & Koronios A. (2015). “How Do Students Use Their Mobile Devices to Support Learning? A Case Study from an Australian Regional University”. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1/2 (2015). Doi: 10.5334/jime.ar
  12. Gill P. S., Kamath A. & Gill T. S. (2012). “Distraction: An Assessment of Smartphone Usage in Health Care Work Settings”. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 5 (2012). Doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S 34813
  13. Gikas J. & Grant M. M. (2013). “Mobile Computing Devices in Higher Education: Student Perspectives on Learning with Cellphones, Smartphones & Social Media”. The Internet and Higher Education 19 (2013) 18-26.
  14. Griffiths M. D. (1996). “Gambling on the Internet: A Brief Note”. Journal of Gambling Studies 12/4 (1996) 471-473