Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 6

Rings Over Which Skew Hurwitz Polynomial Rings Are Reversible and Their Extensions

Skew Hurwitz Polinom Halkası Terslenebilir Olan Halkalar ve Genişlemeleri

Fatma Kaynarca(AFYON KOCATEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5699-3369
Pages
983–990
Publication Date
2020-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In particular, it is proved that for a ring R with characteristic 0 and an α monomorphism of R the Jordan extension A (R, α) of R is weak SH-reversible if and only if R is weak SH-reversible.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper; the concept of the ability of a ring to be reversible is extended to the ring of skew Hurwitz polynomials established on that ring, and the concept of the weak skew Hurwitz reversible (briefly weak SH-reversible) ring is introduced.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some properties of this ring class and its relations with other ring classes are examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In particular, it is proved that for a ring R with characteristic 0 and an α monomorphism of R the Jordan extension A (R, α) of R is weak SH-reversible if and only if R is weak SH-reversible.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Terslenebilir halka · Skew Hurwitz polinom halkası · Zayıf SH-terslenebilir halka

Abstract

In this paper; the concept of the ability of a ring to be reversible is extended to the ring of skew Hurwitz polynomials established on that ring, and the concept of the weak skew Hurwitz reversible (briefly weak SH-reversible) ring is introduced. Some properties of this ring class and its relations with other ring classes are examined. It is also investigated whether some extension of weak SH-reversible rings are weak SH-reversible. In particular, it is proved that for a ring R with characteristic 0 and an α monomorphism of R the Jordan extension A (R, α) of R is weak SH-reversible if and only if R is weak SH-reversible.

Özet

Bu çalışmada; bir halkanın terslenebilir olması kavramı, o halka üzerine kurulan skew Hurwitz polinomlar halkasına genişletilerek, zayıf skew Hurwitz terslenebilir (kısaca zayıf SH-terslenebilir) halka kavramı tanıtılmıştır. Bu halka sınıfının bazı özelikleri ve diğer halka sınıflarıyla ilişkileri incelenmiştir. Zayıf SH-terslenebilir halkaların bazı genişlemelerinin de zayıf SH-terslenebilir olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Özel olarak, karakteristiği 0 olan bir R halkası ve R’nin bir α monomorfizması için R’nin zayıf SH-terslenebilir olması için gerek ve yeter koşul A(R,α) Jordan genişlemesinin zayıf SH-terslenebilir olması gerektiği ispatlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaynarca, F. (2020). Rings Over Which Skew Hurwitz Polynomial Rings Are Reversible and Their Extensions. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 6, 983–990. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.746509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Ahmadi, M., Moussavi, A. and Nourozi, V., 2014. On skew Hurwitz serieswise Armendariz rings. Asian-European Journal of Mathematics, 7(3), 1450036.
  2. Başer, M., Hong, C. Y. and Kwak, T. K., 2009. On extended reversible rings. Algebra Colloquium, 16(1), 37-48.
  3. Cohn, P. M., 1999. Reversible rings. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 31, 641-648.
  4. Hashemi, E., Moussavi, A., 2005. Polynomial extensions of quasi-Baer rings, Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 3, 207-224.
  5. Hassanein, A. M., 2007. Clean rings of skew Hurwitz series, Le Mathematiche, 62(1), 47-54.
  6. Hassanein, A. M., 2012. On uniquely clean skew Hurwitz series, Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, 35, 5-10.
  7. Herstein, I. N., 1975. Topics in Algebra, Xerox College Publishing Lexington, Massachusetts Toronto, 1-388.
  8. Hong, C. Y., Kim, N. Y., Kwak, T. K., 2000. Ore extensions of Baer and p.p-rings, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 151(3), 215-226.
  9. Jin, H. L., Kaynarca, F. and Kwak, T. K., Lee, Y. 2017. On commutativity of skew polynomials at zero. Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society, 54, 51-69.
  10. Jordan, D. A., 1982. Bijective extensions of injective rings endomorphism, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 25(3), 435-448.
  11. Kaynarca, F., Yıldırım, M. A., 2020. Reversibility of skew Hurwitz series rings, accepted by Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics.
  12. Keigher, W. F., 1975. Adjunctions and comonads in differential algebra, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 59, 99-112.
  13. Keigher, W. F., 1997. On the ring of Hurwitz series, Communications in Algebra, 25(6), 1845-1859.
  14. Kim, N. K., Lee, Y., 2003. Extensions of reversible rings, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 185(1-3), 207-223.
  15. Krempa, J., 1996. Some examples of reduced rings, Algebra Colloquium, 3(4), 289-300.
  16. Paykan, K., 2017. Principally quasi-Baer skew Hurwitz series rings, Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana, 10(4), 607-616.
  17. Rege, M. B., Chhawchharia, S., 1997. Armendariz rings, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Ser. A, Mathematical Sciences, 73(1), 14-17.
  18. Yang, G., Liu, Z. K., 2008. On weak reversible rings, Taiwenese Journal of Mathematics, 12(1), 129-136.