Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2

A Hybrid Free Space Optics-Fiber Wavelength Division Multiplexed Communication System with 0.21 nm Channel Spacing

0.21 nm Kanal Aralıklı Hibrit Serbest Uzay Optiği-Fiber Dalga Boyu Bölmeli Çoğullama Haberleşme Sistemi

Thoalfeqar Alyasırı(KUTAHYA DUMLUPINAR UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8379-0751
Mustafa Namdar(KUTAHYA DUMLUPINAR UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3522-4608
Ahmet Altuncu(AFYON KOCATEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3753-9515
Pages
364–376
Publication Date
2026-03-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, a 20 Gbps backhaul link can be realized using high-altitude platform stations (HAPS) for distances longer than 50 km, as shown in the proposed model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Optical communication technologies in atmospheric layers for non-terrestrial communication applications in 6G communication systems are vital to achieving high data rate capacity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it has been theoretically shown that a 100-channel DWDM hybrid FSO-Fiber optic communication system with 0.21 nm (~26.9 GHz) channel spacing can offer better communication performance compared to 25 GHz and 50 GHz spacing systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, a 20 Gbps backhaul link can be realized using high-altitude platform stations (HAPS) for distances longer than 50 km, as shown in the proposed model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:WDM Sistemi · FSO · Optik İletişim

Abstract

Optical communication technologies in atmospheric layers for non-terrestrial communication applications in 6G communication systems are vital to achieving high data rate capacity. In this context, the use of optical communication systems using the dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) technique is being investigated. In this study, it has been theoretically shown that a 100-channel DWDM hybrid FSO-Fiber optic communication system with 0.21 nm (~26.9 GHz) channel spacing can offer better communication performance compared to 25 GHz and 50 GHz spacing systems. Additionally, a 20 Gbps backhaul link can be realized using high-altitude platform stations (HAPS) for distances longer than 50 km, as shown in the proposed model.

Özet

6G iletişim sistemlerinde karasal olmayan iletişim uygulamaları için atmosferik katmanlarda optik iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanılması, yüksek veri hızı kapasitesine ulaşmak için hayati önem taşımaktadır. Bu bağlamda, yoğun dalga boyu bölmeli çoğullama (DWDM) tekniğini kullanan optik iletişim sistemlerinin kullanımı araştırılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, 0,21 nm (~26,9 GHz) kanal aralıklı 100 kanallı DWDM hibrit FSO-Fiber optik haberleşme sisteminin 25 GHz ve 50 GHz aralıklı sistemlere kıyasla daha iyi bir iletişim performansı sunabileceği teorik olarak gösterilmiştir. Ayrıca, önerilen modelde gösterildiği gibi, 50 km'den daha uzun mesafeler için yüksek irtifa platform istasyonları (HAPS) kullanılarak 20 Gbps'lik bir ana taşıyıcı bağlantısı gerçekleştirilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alyasırı, T., Namdar, M., Altuncu, A. (2026). A Hybrid Free Space Optics-Fiber Wavelength Division Multiplexed Communication System with 0.21 nm Channel Spacing. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 364–376. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1616245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Agrawal, G. P. 2019. Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 6th ed. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-02270-3
  2. Aladeloba, A. O., Phillips, A. J., & Woolfson, M. S. (2012). Improved bit error rate evaluation for optically pre-amplified free-space optical communication systems in turbulent atmosphere. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 30(13), 2183-2187.
  3. Al-Azzawi, A. A. 2024. 420 Gb/s WDM Hybrid FSO-Fiber Communication System Based on Tunable Optical Frequency Comb Sources, Journal of Optics https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-024-02281-3
  4. Alimi, I. A.; Teixeira, A. L.; Monteiro, P. P. 2018. Toward an Efficient C-RAN Optical Fronthaul for the Future Networks: A Tutorial on Technologies, Requirements, Challenges, and Solutions, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20)2(,708–769.
  5. Andrews, L. C.; Phillips, R. L. 2005. Laser Beam Propagation Through Atmospheric Turbulence, 2nd ed. SPIE Press: Bellingham, WA, USA https://doi.org/10.1117/3.626196
  6. Barnes, N. P.; Walsh, P. J. 1988. Loss of Gaussian Beams Through Off-Axis Circular Apertures, Applied Optics, 27(7), 1230. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.27.001230
  7. Boley, A. C.; Byers, M. 2021. Satellite Mega-Constellations Create Risks in Low Earth Orbit, the Atmosphere and on Earth, Scientific Reports, 11, 10642
  8. Borralho, R.; Mohamed, A.; Quddus, A. U.; Vieira, P.; Tafazolli, R. 2021. A Survey on Coverage Enhancement in Cellular Networks: Challenges and Solutions for Future Deployments, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23)2(, 1302–1341
  9. David, F.; Giggenbach, D.; Landrock, R.; Pribil, K.; Fischer, E. W.; Buschner, R. G.; Blaschke, D. 2002. Preliminary Results of a 61 km Ground-to-Ground Optical IM/DD Data Transmission Experiment, in Proc. SPIE Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XIV, 4635, 16–23
  10. Epple, B. 2010. Simplified channel model for simulation of free-space optical communications. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 2(5), 293-304.
  11. Esmail, M. A., Ragheb, A., Fathallah, H., & Alouini, M. S. 2016. Investigation and demonstration of high speed full-optical hybrid FSO/fiber communication system under light sand storm condition. IEEE Photonics Journal, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2016.2641741
  12. Ghassemlooy, Z.; Popoola, W.; Rajbhandari, S. 2019. Optical Wireless Communications: System and Channel Modelling with MATLAB®. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  13. Hamza, A. S.; Deogun, J. S.; Alexander, D. R. 2019. Classification Framework for Free Space Optical Communication Links and Systems, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21(3), 1346–1382
  14. Ismaiel, A. M.; Elsaidy, E.; Albagory, Y.; Atallah, H. A.; Abdel-Rahman, A. B.; Sallam, T. 2018. Performance Improvement of High Altitude Platform Using Concentric Circular Antenna Array Based on Particle Swarm Optimization, AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 91, 85–90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.05.002
  15. Kaushal, H.; Kaddoum, G. 2017. Optical Communication in Space: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(1), 57–96
  16. Kaymak, Y.; Rojas-Cessa, R.; Feng, J.; Ansari, N.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, T. 2018. A Survey on Acquisition, Tracking, and Pointing Mechanisms for Mobile Free-Space Optical Communications, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(2), 1104–1123
  17. Khalighi, M. A.; Uysal, M. 2014. Survey on Free Space Optical Communication: A Communication Theory Perspective, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(4), 2231–2258
  18. Kim, I. I., McArthur, B., & Korevaar, E. J. 2001. Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications. In Optical Wireless Communications III SPIE, 4214, 26-37
  19. Kruse, P. W.; McGlauchlin, L. D.; McQuistan, R. B. 1962. Elements of Infrared Technology: Generation, Transmission and Detection. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA
  20. Le, H. D.; Pham, A. T. 2022. Link-Layer Retransmission-Based Error-Control Protocols in FSO Communications: A Survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(3), 1602–1633
  21. Li, P.; Xu, J. 2020. Fundamental Rate Limits of UAV-Enabled Multiple Access Channel with Trajectory Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 19(1), 458–474,
  22. Mishchenko, M. I.; Travis, L. D.; Lacis, A. A. 2002. Scattering, Absorption, and Emission of Light by Small Particles. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK
  23. Nelson, L. E. et al., Nov. 2014. Spatial Super-Channels in Optical Communications, arXiv:1411.7217 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.7217
  24. Ojo, J., Olaitan, J., & Ojo, O. 2022. Characterization of fog-induced attenuation for optimizing optical propagation links in Nigeria. Results in Optics, 9, 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rio.2022.100279
  25. Poliak, J.; Pezzei, P.; Leitgeb, E.; Wilfert, O. 2012. Link Budget for High-Speed Short-Distance Wireless Optical Link, in Proc. 8th IEEE International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks & Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP), Poznan, Poland, 1–6.
  26. Rappaport, T. S. 2024. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Saavedra, G. et al., 2021. High-Capacity Transmission Over Hollow-Core NANF Using Ultra-Dense WDM and DSP, J. Light. Technol., 39(13), 4300-4308.
  28. Secondini, M., Forestieri, E., & Prati, G. 2013. Achievable Information Rate in Nonlinear WDM Fiber-Optic Systems With Arbitrary Modulation Formats and Dispersion Maps. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 31(23), 3839–3852. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2013.2288299
  29. Siok, K.; Ewiak, I.; Jenerowicz, A. 2020. Multi-Sensor Fusion: A Simulation Approach to Pansharpening Aerial and Satellite Images, Sensors, 20(24), 7100 https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247100
  30. Xiao, Yuzhe, René-Jean Essiambre, Marc Desgroseilliers, Antonia M. Tulino, Roland Ryf, Sami Mumtaz, and Govind P. Agrawal, 2014. Theory of intermodal four-wave mixing with random linear mode coupling in few-mode fibers, Opt. Express, 22, 32039-32059 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.032039
  31. Zountouridou, E. 2023. A Guide to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Performance Analysis—The MQ-9 Unmanned Air Vehicle Case Study, Journal of Engineering, 2023, e12270
  32. Aerostar. Thunderhead Balloon Systems. https://aerostar.com/products/balloons-airships/thunderhead-balloons [Apr. 24, 2024].
  33. Aerospace Technology. ScanEagle 3 Unmanned Aircraft System. https://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/scaneagle-3-unmanned-aircraft-system/ [Apr. 24, 2024].
  34. Fosco Connect. Spectrally-Efficient Multiplexing: Nyquist-WDM. Fiber Optics For Sale. https://www.fiberoptics4sale.com/blogs/wave-optics/spectrally-efficient-multiplexing-nyquist-wdm
  35. Fosco Connect. Optical Fiber Loss and Attenuation. https://www.fiberoptics4sale.com/wordpress/optical-fiber-loss-and-attenuation/ [Jan. 15, 2025].
  36. GSMA Report, 2021. Wireless Backhaul Evolution: Delivering Next-Generation Connectivity. https://www.gsma.com/spectrum/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/wireless-backhaul-spectrum.pdf [Apr. 24, 2024].
  37. GSMA Report, 2021. High Altitude Platform Systems: Towers in the Skies. https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GSMA-HAPS-Towers-in-the-skies-Whitepaper-2021-1.pdf [Apr. 24, 2024].
  38. Loon. Expanding Internet Connectivity with Stratospheric Balloons. http://www.google.com/loon/ [Apr. 24, 2024].
  39. Ocean Optics Web Book. The Physics of Scattering. https://www.oceanopticsbook.info/view/scattering/physics-scattering [Jan. 15, 2025].
  40. Sceye. Stratospheric Platforms to Improve Life on Our Planet. https://www.sceye.com/ [Apr. 24, 2024].
  41. Synopsys. What Is Light Scattering and How Does It Work? https://www.synopsys.com/glossary/what-is-light-scattering.html [Jan. 15, 2025].
  42. Task & Purpose. After 64 Days, the Army’s Drone That Wouldn’t Die Has Died. https://taskandpurpose.com/news/after-64-days-the-armys-drone-that-wouldnt-die-has-died/ [Apr. 24, 2024].
  43. The Verge. Mar. 7, 2014. Google’s Balloons versus Facebook’s Drones: The Dogfight to Send Internet from the Sky https://www.theverge.com/2014/3/7/5473692/facebook-drone-titan-aerospace-project-loon [Apr. 24, 2024].