SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

The Effect of Teaching the Fifth-Grade 'Propagation of Light' Unit Based on the 5e Learning Model on Students' Learning Outcomes

5E Öğrenme Modeline Dayalı Olarak Hazırlanan "Işığın Yayılması" Ünitesinin Beşinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Çıktıları Üzerindeki Etkisi

Esra Duman(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6036-6296
Emine Uzun(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9497-1558
Pages
1036–1065
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the 5E learning model had a significant positive effect on students' academic achievement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the impact of the 5E learning model on fifth-grade students' academic achievement, motivation, and attitudes in the "Propagation of Light" unit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was carried out during the first semester of the 2022-2023 academic year at a middle school in Kahramanmaras.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the 5E learning model had a significant positive effect on students' academic achievement.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2022-2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fen bilimleri · Işığın yayılması · 5E modeli

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of the 5E learning model on fifth-grade students' academic achievement, motivation, and attitudes in the "Propagation of Light" unit. The research was carried out during the first semester of the 2022-2023 academic year at a middle school in Kahramanmaras. Data were collected using three instruments: the Light Propagation Academic Achievement Test (LPAAT), the Science Attitude Scale (SAS), and the Science Motivation Scale (SMS). A quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test control group was employed. Before the intervention, pre-tests were administered to both groups. Subsequently, the experimental group (n=23) was taught using 5E model-based activities, while the control group (n=24) followed traditional teaching methods for six weeks. Following the implementation, post-tests were conducted to measure the learning outcomes. The results indicated that the 5E learning model had a significant positive effect on students' academic achievement. The experimental group showed statistically higher post-test scores compared to the control group. Furthermore, the significant improvement in the experimental group's scores from the pre-test to the post-test suggests that the 5E model positively contributed to students' short-term academic achievement. Regarding motivation, students in the experimental group exhibited significantly higher motivation levels towards science compared to the control group. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups concerning attitudes towards science. The study concludes that the 5E model can be a highly effective approach for improving students' academic performance and motivation in science education.

Özet

Bu çalışma, 5E öğrenme modelinin, beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin "Işığın Yayılması" ünitesindeki akademik başarı, motivasyon ve tutumları üzerindeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, 2022-2023 eğitim-öğretim yılının ilk döneminde Kahramanmaraş'ta bulunan bir ortaokulda yürütülmüştür. Veri toplama aracı olarak Işığın Yayılması Akademik Başarı Testi, Fen Tutum Ölçeği ve Fen Motivasyon Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, ön-test ve son-test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Öğretim öncesi ön-testler uygulanmış, sonrasında deney grubu (n=23) 5E modeline dayalı etkinliklerle, kontrol grubu (n=24) ise geleneksel öğretim yöntemleriyle ders işlemiştir. Altı hafta süren uygulamanın ardından her iki gruba da son-testler yapılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre, 5E öğrenme modelinin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerinde anlamlı ve olumlu bir etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Deney grubunun son-test puanları, kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Ayrıca deney grubunun ön-testten son-teste olan puan artışı, 5E modelinin öğrencilerin kısa vadeli akademik başarılarına olumlu katkı sağladığını göstermektedir. Motivasyon konusunda da deney grubundaki öğrencilerin fen bilimlerine yönelik motivasyon düzeylerinin kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ancak fen tutumları açısından gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farka rastlanmamıştır. Çalışma, 5E modelinin öğrencilerin fen eğitimindeki akademik başarı ve motivasyonlarını artırmak için oldukça etkili bir yaklaşım olabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Duman, E., Uzun, E. (2025). The Effect of Teaching the Fifth-Grade 'Propagation of Light' Unit Based on the 5e Learning Model on Students' Learning Outcomes. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 1036–1065. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.1701809

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Abungu, H. E., Okere, M. I. O., & Wachanga, S. W. (2014). The effect of science process skills teaching approach on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry in Nyando District, Kenya. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(6), 359–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p359
  2. Alkan, İ., & Bayri, N. (2017). A meta‐analysis study on the relationship between motivation towards learning science and science achievement. Journal of Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty of Dicle University, 32, 865–874. http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1853
  3. Aydın, S., & Yılmaz, M. (2010). The effect of the 5E learning model on students’ achievement and attitude in science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 20–34.
  4. Başkan, Z., Alev, N., & Karal, İ. S. (2010). Physics and mathematics teachers’ ideas about topics that could be related or integrated. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1558–1562.
  5. Bhatt, A., & Chhikara, M. (2020). Effectiveness of 5E instructional model on achievement in science of rural area students. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8(6), 2287–2293.
  6. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard University Press.
  7. Bybee, R. W. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
  8. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
  9. Coştu, B., & Ayas, A. (2002). The effect of conceptual change text and conceptual change strategies on students’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 1(2), 57–62.
  10. Demir, M., Demir, H., & Önder, F. (2012). Students’ motivation in science learning: A case of seventh graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 89–105.
  11. Erdoğdu, S. (2011). Meta-analysis of 5E model effects in Turkish science education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21(1), 85–101.
  12. García-Carrillo, M., López-Pérez, M. V., & Sánchez-Pernía, N. (2020). Effects of the 5E model on STEM outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 8.
  13. Irak, M. (2019). 5. Sınıf Fen Bilimleri Dersi Işığın Yayılması Ünitesine Yönelik STEM Uygulamalarının Akademik Başarı ve STEM’e Karşı Tutum Üzerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Kocaeli Üniversitesi.
  14. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. İçinde S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (ss. 831–879). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  15. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
  16. Nguyen, L. T., & McComas, W. F. (2021). The impact of the 5E instructional model on students’ motivation and attitudes toward science learning: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(3), 339–354.
  17. Öcal, N., & Dönmez, S. (2022). A systematic review of 5E instructional model studies in Turkey: Trends and gaps. Turkish Journal of Education, 11(3), 102–125.
  18. Özsevgeç, T. (2006). The effect of drawing method supported instruction on students’ learning and retention of chemical concepts. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(1), 55–66.
  19. Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
  20. Sevim, B. (2013). Preservice teachers’ misconceptions about force and motion. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(3), 54–64.
  21. Selçuk, Ş., Ünsal, Y., & Ergin, Ö. (2015). Investigation of the effect of conceptual change texts on students’ learning of light propagation. Journal of Educational Research, 18(1), 23–39.
  22. Smith, A. J., Jones, B. K., & Lee, C. H. (2019). Efficacy of the 5E learning cycle: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Educational Research Review, 27, 1–14.
  23. Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654.
  24. Uzun, S., & Keleş, E. (2010). Examining science learning motivation in terms of some variables. Kırşehir Journal of Education Faculty, 11(3), 113–127.
  25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  26. Yalçın, N. (2010). The relationship between secondary school students’ attitudes toward science and technology course and their achievement (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi.
  27. Yeşilyurt, M., Bayraktar, Ş., Kan, S., & Orak, S. (2005). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin ışık kavramı ile ilgili düşünceleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 1–24.