Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Newborn Hearing Screening Outcomes at Uludağ University

Uludağ Üniversitesi Yenidoğan İşitme Taraması Sonuçları

Pages
27–29
Publication Date
2009-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although, hearing loss were diagnosed in none of the children from both groups, routine use of newborn hearing screening was suggested to diagnose the newborn hearing losses in the expected ratio of the population, however, the low rate of attendance to control decreased the efficacy of the screening.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to initiate newborn hearing screening program at Uludağ University, transient-evoked otoacoustic emisssion (TEOAE) test was performed on 402 newborns between February 2005 – February 2006.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additionally, the risk factors for newborn hearing losses were inquired. 219 newborns passed TEOAE test at the first examination; in 183 newborns the test results were suspicious.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although, hearing loss were diagnosed in none of the children from both groups, routine use of newborn hearing screening was suggested to diagnose the newborn hearing losses in the expected ratio of the population, however, the low rate of attendance to control decreased the efficacy of the screening.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:yenidoğan · işitme taraması · risk faktörleri

Abstract

In order to initiate newborn hearing screening program at Uludağ University, transient-evoked otoacoustic emisssion (TEOAE) test was performed on 402 newborns between February 2005 – February 2006. Additionally, the risk factors for newborn hearing losses were inquired. 219 newborns passed TEOAE test at the first examination; in 183 newborns the test results were suspicious. Only 24 of 183 newborns, who were called for the second test, attended and all passed. The risk factors for probable hearing loss (drug use in mother, aminoglicozide use in newborn etc.) were found in 125 of 219 newborns who passed in the first test and 115 of 183 newborns who failed in the first test. Although, hearing loss were diagnosed in none of the children from both groups, routine use of newborn hearing screening was suggested to diagnose the newborn hearing losses in the expected ratio of the population, however, the low rate of attendance to control decreased the efficacy of the screening.

Özet

Hastanemizde yenidoğanlarda işitme taraması uygulamasının başlatılması amacıyla Şubat 2005 – Şubat 2006 tarihleri arasında Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi'nde doğan 402 bebeğe Transient Uyarılmış Oto Akustik Emisyon ( TEOAE) testi uygulandı. Ek olarak yenidoğan işitme kaybı açısından belirlenen risk faktörleri sorgulandı. 219 yenidoğan bebek ilk testi geçti, 183 yenidoğanda ilk testte şüpheli sonuç elde edildi. Kontrole çağrılan bebeklerden sadece 24'ü geldi ve tamamı ikinci testi geçti. İlk aşamada testi geçemeyen 183 bebeğin 115'inde ve ilk aşama testi geçen 219 bebeğin ise 125'inde yenidoğan işitme kaybına neden olabilecek risk faktörleri saptandı ( annede ilaç kullanımı, bebekte aminoglikozid kullanımı vb.). Hiçbir grupta işitme kayıplı bebek saptanmamasına rağmen yenidoğan işitme taramasının rutin olarak uygulanmasının toplumda öngörülen sıklıkta yenidoğan işitme kayıplarını ortaya çıkaracağı ancak kontrole gelen hasta sayısının düşük olması taramanın verimliliğini düşürdüğü sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERYILMAZ, A., İLERİ, Ö., ÇAKIN, M., SARAYDAROĞLU, G., HIZALAN, İ., ONART, S. (2009). Newborn Hearing Screening Outcomes at Uludağ University. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 27–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/135107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...