Journals / Dünya Dilleri, Edebiyatları ve Çeviri Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

FROM THE ASCENT OF SPECTACLE TO THE COLLAPSE OF MEANING: MYTH, ETERNAL RETURN, AND THE MYTHOPOETIC REWRITING OF CULTURAL MEMORY IN BABYLON

GÖSTERİNİN YÜKSELİŞİNDEN ANLAMIN ÇÖKÜŞÜNE: BABİL FİLMİNDE MİT, EBEDİ DÖNÜŞ VE KÜLTÜREL HAFIZANIN MİTOPOETİK YENİDEN YAZIMI

Serap Sarıbaş(KARAMANOĞLU MEHMETBEY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4079-8024
Pages
1–19
Publication Date
2026-07-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ultimately, Babylon acquires the force of a mythopoetic allegory that conceives cultural continuity in terms of fracture, repetition, loss, and the labor of reconstruction, apart from the ideals of stability, completion, and historical coherence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines Damien Chazelle’s Babylon (2022) as a contemporary Hollywood allegory in dialogue with the Babylon/Babel myth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The film’s transition from silent to sound cinema exceeds the status of technological development and acquires the force of a formative rupture, reorganizing body, voice, performance, visibility, and cultural memory within modern film history.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ultimately, Babylon acquires the force of a mythopoetic allegory that conceives cultural continuity in terms of fracture, repetition, loss, and the labor of reconstruction, apart from the ideals of stability, completion, and historical coherence.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Amerikan sineması · Babil miti · temsil krizi

Abstract

This article examines Damien Chazelle’s Babylon (2022) as a contemporary Hollywood allegory in dialogue with the Babylon/Babel myth. The film’s transition from silent to sound cinema exceeds the status of technological development and acquires the force of a formative rupture, reorganizing body, voice, performance, visibility, and cultural memory within modern film history. The analysis places Hollywood’s claims to permanence, grandeur, and cultural authority in relation to dispersal, repetition, corporeal excess, and historical erosion. Babylon casts Hollywood as a modern Babylon/Babel formation: Babylon evokes grandeur, excess, and collapse; Babel evokes linguistic dispersal, plurality, and communicative crisis. The opening party sequences, sound-recording scenes, Nellie LaRoy’s corporeal excess and voice, and the final montage constitute the article’s principal analytical sites. These scenes bring carnivalesque excess, technical discipline, simulation, aura’s erosion, and cultural memory into a single interpretive field. Nellie LaRoy’s body and voice exemplify the star body that Hollywood renders visible, disciplines, and ultimately marks as excessive. The final montage reconstructs cinema history outside linear progress, arranging it as fragments, citations, repetitions, and visual residues. Babylon produces Hollywood’s dream of visual immortality and exposes its instability within the same cinematic structure. The article approaches Hollywood as a symbolic field for American modernity’s myths of progress, celebrity, technological mastery, and permanence, exceeding the limits of film industry. Ultimately, Babylon acquires the force of a mythopoetic allegory that conceives cultural continuity in terms of fracture, repetition, loss, and the labor of reconstruction, apart from the ideals of stability, completion, and historical coherence.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Damien Chazelle’in Babil (2022) filmini Babil/Babel mitiyle ilişkili çağdaş bir Hollywood alegorisi olarak inceler. Film, sessiz sinemadan sesli sinemaya geçişi yalnızca teknolojik bir yenilik değil, modern sinema kültüründe beden, ses, performans ve bellek üzerinde etkili kurucu bir kırılma olarak yorumlar. Bu çerçevede Hollywood’un kalıcılık, görkem ve kültürel otorite iddiaları; dağılma, tekrar, bedensel taşkınlık ve tarihsel aşınma süreçleriyle birlikte okunur. Makalenin temel iddiası, Babil’de Hollywood’un modern bir Babil/Babel figürü olarak temsil edildiği yönündedir: Babil ihtişam, aşırılık ve çöküş imgesiyle; Babel ise dilsel dağılma, çoğulluk ve iletişim kriziyle ilişkilendirilir. Çalışmada açılış partisi sahneleri, ses kayıt sahneleri, Nellie LaRoy’un bedensel taşkınlığı ve ses performansı ile final montajı merkeze alınır. Bu sahneler aracılığıyla karnavalesk taşkınlık, teknik disiplin, simülasyon, aura kaybı ve kültürel bellek ilişkisi tartışılır. Nellie LaRoy’un bedeni ve sesi, Hollywood’un görünür kıldığı, fakat aynı anda dışladığı yıldız bedeninin belirleyici bir örneği olarak öne çıkar. Final montajı, sinema tarihini doğrusal ilerleme anlatısı içinde değil, fragman, alıntı, tekrar ve görsel kalıntı mantığı içinde yeniden kurar. Bu nedenle Babil, Hollywood’un görsel ölümsüzlük arzusunu hem kuran hem de aşındıran bir sinemasal yapı olarak okunur. Bu okuma, Hollywood’u yalnızca bir film endüstrisi olarak değil, Amerikan modernitesinin mit, bellek ve görsel iktidar üreten simgesel alanı olarak konumlandırır. Makale, filmin Amerikan kültüründeki ilerleme, şöhret, teknolojik hâkimiyet ve kalıcılık mitlerini sorguladığını ileri sürer. Sonuç olarak Babil, kültürel sürekliliği istikrar ve tamamlanmışlık fikrine değil; kırılma, tekrar, kayıp ve yeniden kurma emeğine dayalı biçimde düşünen mitopoetik bir alegori niteliği kazanır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sarıbaş, S. (2026). FROM THE ASCENT OF SPECTACLE TO THE COLLAPSE OF MEANING: MYTH, ETERNAL RETURN, AND THE MYTHOPOETIC REWRITING OF CULTURAL MEMORY IN BABYLON. Dünya Dilleri, Edebiyatları ve Çeviri Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 1–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/1340665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
  3. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Indiana University Press.
  4. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press.
  5. Benjamin, W. (1968a). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (H. Zohn, Trans., pp. 217–251). Schocken Books.
  6. Benjamin, W. (1968b). Theses on the philosophy of history. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (H. Zohn, Trans., pp. 253–264). Schocken Books.
  7. Chazelle, D. (Director). (2022). Babylon [Film]. Paramount Pictures.
  8. Debord, G. (1967). The society of the spectacle. Buchet-Chastel.
  9. Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge. (Original work published 1966)
  10. Ehrlich, D. (2022, December 16). Babylon review: Damien Chazelle’s wild Hollywood epic is a mess worth making. IndieWire. https://www.indiewire.com/criticism/movies/babylon-review-damien-chazelle-movie-1234791821/
  11. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
  12. Jameson, F. (1981). The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. Cornell University Press.
  13. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
  14. Nietzsche, F. (2001). The gay science (J. Nauckhoff, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1882)
  15. Runions, E. (2010). Tolerating Babel: The Bible, film, and the family in U.S. biopolitics. Fordham University Press.
  16. Scott, A. O. (2022, December 22). Review: Babylon wants to capture old Hollywood, but it’s just noise. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/22/movies/babylon-review.html
  17. The Guardian. (2022, December 23). The Babylon review: Damien Chazelle’s wild Hollywood epic. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/dec/23/babylon-review-damien-chazelle-margot-robbie-brad-pitt
  18. The Holy Bible. (1984). New International Version. Zondervan.