SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study

Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and the Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study

Fatma Ayşe Şanal(BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.)0000-0002-2864-6589
Hamiyet Kılınç(BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.)0000-0001-8055-3470
Pages
9–14
Publication Date
2020-03-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The shade of denture teeth and denture cleansing method had a significant effect on ΔE values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The objective of the present study is to evaluate color stability of two different shaded acrylic denture teeth and effectiveness of different cleansing methods on the stain removal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material-Method: Baseline color readings of 50 right maxillary central incisors of both A1 and A2 shaded denture teeth were performed with a spectrophotometer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The shade of denture teeth and denture cleansing method had a significant effect on ΔE values.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akrilik Yapay Dişler · Temizleme Etkinliği · Kahve Renklenmesi

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study is to evaluate color stability of two different shaded acrylic denture teeth and effectiveness of different cleansing methods on the stain removal. Material-Method: Baseline color readings of 50 right maxillary central incisors of both A1 and A2 shaded denture teeth were performed with a spectrophotometer. Specimens were immersed in staining solution for 72 h and the second color readings were carried out. Stained A1 and A2 shaded denture teeth were randomly divided into five subgroups according to cleansing methods as Corega 5-min (Groups of 1C5 for A1, 2C5 for A2), Protefix 3-min (Groups of 1P3, 2P3), Corega 3-min (Groups of 1C3, 2C3), brushing (Groups of 1B, 2B), distilled water (Groups of 1control, 2control) (n=10). Third color readings were performed after the related denture cleaning procedures were applied to the stained teeth. First color change (ΔE 1 ) values were calculated according to baseline and second color readings while second color change (ΔE 2 ) values were calculated according to second and third color readings. Differences among ΔE 1 values of the A1 and A2 shaded groups were analyzed with Independent Samples Test. ΔE 2 values were analyzed with two way analysis of variance (2-way ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were made using the Tukey HSD test. Results: ΔE 1 values were higher for A2 shaded teeth, while ΔE 2 values were higher for A1 shaded denture teeth (p<0.05) for all groups. The investigated denture cleansing methods caused higher ΔE 2 values than the control groups for both A1 and A2 shaded brands (p<0.05). For the A1 shaded brand, the highest ΔE 2 value was observed for Group 1C3 (p<0.05). For the A2 shaded brand, ΔE 2 values were similar among the test groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: The shade of denture teeth and denture cleansing method had a significant effect on ΔE values.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı renkte akrilik yapay dişin renk stabilitelerinin ve farklı protez temizleme yöntemlerinin renklenmeyi gidermedeki etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 50 adet A1 ve A2 renkte yapay dişin her biri için ilk renk ölçümleri spektrofotometre kullanılarak yapıldı. Örnekler 72 s boyunca renklendirici solusyonda bekletildi ve ikinci renk ölçümleri gerçekleştirildi. Renklenen A1 ve A2 yapay dişler, protez temizleme yöntemine göre Corega 5-dak (A1 için 1C5, A2 için 2C5 Grupları), Corega 3-dak (1C3 ve 2C3 Grupları), Protefix 3-dak (1P3 ve 2P3 Grupları), fırçalama (1B, 2B Grupları) ve distile su (1 kontrol, 2 kontrol Grupları) olarak rastgele 5 alt gruba ayrıldı. Renklenmiş dişlere ilgili protez temizleme işlemlerinin uygulanmasının ardından üçüncü renk ölçümleri gerçekleştirildi. İlk renk değişimi (ΔE 1 ) değerleri ilk ve ikinci renk ölçümlerine göre hesaplanırken, ikinci renkdeğişimi (ΔE 2 ) değerleri ikinci ve üçüncü renk ölçümlerine göre hesaplandı. A1 ve A2 renk grupların ΔE 1 değerleri arasındaki farklılıklar Independent Samples Test ile analiz edildi. ΔE 2 değerleri çift yönlü varyans analizi (2-way ANOVA) ile test edildi. Çoklu karşılaştırmalar Tukey HSD testi ile yapıldı. Sonuçlar: Tüm gruplarda ΔE 1 değerleri A2 renkli yapay dişler için daha yüksek iken, ΔE 2 değerleri A1 renkli yapay dişler için daha yüksek idi (p<0.05). İncelenen protez temizleme yöntemleri hem A1 hem A2 renkli yapay dişler için kontrol grubundan daha yüksek ΔE 2 değerlerine neden oldu (p<0.05). A1 renkli yapay dişler için, en yüksek ΔE 2 değerleri Grup 1C3 için elde edildi (p<0.05). A2 renkli yapay dişler için, test gruplarının ΔE 2 değerleri benzer idi (p>0.05). Sonuç: Yapay diş rengi ve protez temizleme metodu ΔE değerleri üzerinde etkilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şanal, F. A., Kılınç, H. (2020). Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 9–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/1335315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Köksal T, Dikbaş İ. Color stability of different denture teeth materials against various staining agents. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 139-44.
  2. Mutlu-Sagesen L, Ergun G, Ozkan Y, Bek B. Color stability of different denture teeth materials: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci 2001; 43: 193-205.
  3. Alam M, Jagger R, Vowles R, Moran J. Comparative stain removal properties of four commercially available denture cleaning products: an in vitro study. Int J Dent Hyg 2011; 9: 37–42.
  4. Jagger DC, Harrison A. Denture cleansing – the best approach. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 413–17.
  5. Jagger DC, Al-Akhazam L, Harrison A, Rees JS. The effectiveness of seven denture cleansers on tea stain removal from PMMA acrylic resin. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 549–52.
  6. Al-Huraishi H, Moran J, Jagger R, MacDonald E. Evaluation of stain removal and inhibition properties of eight denture cleansers: an in vitro study. Gerodontology 2013; 30: 10–7.
  7. Kurtulmuş-Yılmaz S, Deniz ST. Evaluation of staining susceptibility of resin artificial teeth and stain removal efficacy of denture cleansers. Acta Odont Scandinavica 2014; 72: 811-8.
  8. Moon A, Powers JM, Kiat-amnuav S. Color stability of denture teeth and acrylic base resin subjected daily to various consumer cleansers. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 247-55.
  9. Haruyama O, Kameyama A, Ono T, Baba Y, Sugiyama T, Sugiyama S, et al. Combined effects of electric toothbrushing and dentifrice on artificial stain removal: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10: 200-5.
  10. Zoidis P, Polychronakis N, Lagouvardos P, Polyzois G, Ngo H C. Evaluation of a realistic cleansing protocol for preventing discoloration of denture resins. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 89-95.
  11. Hollis S, Eisenbeisz E, Versluis A. Color stability of denture resins after staining and exposure to cleansing agents. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 144: 709-14.
  12. Yamanel K. Farklı İçeceklerin Diş Rengindeki Restoratif Materyallerin Renk Stabiliteleri Üzerine Etkisi. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Derg 2018; 9: 26-31.
  13. Güler AU, Güler E, Yücel AÇ, Ertaş E. Effects of polishing procedures on color stability of composite resins. J Applied Oral Sci 2009; 17: 108-12.
  14. Garcia-Godoy F, Ellacuria J. Effectiveness of Sonicare power too¬thbrush to remove chlorhexidine stains. Am J Dent. 2002; 15: 290-2.
  15. Terézhalmy GT, He T, Walters PA, Grender JM, Biesbrock AR. Clinical assessment of extrinsic stain removal efficacy with a new pul¬sonic toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 2009; 20: 71-4.
  16. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 200–8.
  17. Kuehni RG, Marcus RT. An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences. Col Res Appl 1979; 4: 83–91.
  18. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1760-4.
  19. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 819–22.
  20. Alghazali N, Burnside G, Moallem M, Smith P, Preston A, Jarad FD. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth. J Dent 2012; 40: 10–7.
  21. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 246–51.
  22. Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 254–60.
  23. Regain JC Jr, Johnston WM. Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Col Res Appl 2000; 25: 278–85.
  24. Gregorius WC, Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Roggenkamp CL, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Effects of ageing and staining on color of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Dent 2012; 40: 47-54.