Journals / The European Research Journal / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Analysis of mortality and cost implications in aspiration pneumonia: A retrospective study

Hayriye Bektaş Aksoy(Department of Chest Diseases, Giresun University Faculty of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye)0000-0002-4390-5198
Selda Günaydın(Department of Chest Diseases, Giresun University Faculty of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye)0000-0001-5641-012X
İskender Aksoy(Department of Emergency Medicine, Giresun University Faculty of Medicine, Giresun, Türkiye)0000-0002-4426-3342
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-05-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings underscore the need for multidisciplinary care approaches and early identification of high-risk patients to optimize treatment and resource allocation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the demographic factors, clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs associated with aspiration pneumonia, focusing on mortality rates and the economic burden on healthcare systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from patients admitted to the Emergency Department of Samsun Training and Research Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017 and followed in the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings underscore the need for multidisciplinary care approaches and early identification of high-risk patients to optimize treatment and resource allocation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aspiration pneumonia · nutritional support · mortality

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the demographic factors, clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs associated with aspiration pneumonia, focusing on mortality rates and the economic burden on healthcare systems. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from patients admitted to the Emergency Department of Samsun Training and Research Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017 and followed in the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. The study recorded demographic-clinical parameters, nutritional methods, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, clinical outcomes, and cost situations for 60 patients. Results: The average age of male patients was found to be higher than that of female patients, with a broader age range observed among men. The study identified significantly higher ICU stays and costs for deceased patients. The age group with the highest mortality rate was 66-80 years. Additionally, advanced nutritional support methods, such as enteral and parenteral nutrition, were associated with higher mortality rates. Conclusions: Aspiration pneumonia represents a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, particularly for patients with poor outcomes. Age, ICU length of stay, and the need for advanced nutritional support are key factors influencing mortality. The findings underscore the need for multidisciplinary care approaches and early identification of high-risk patients to optimize treatment and resource allocation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aksoy, H. B., Günaydın, S., Aksoy, İ. (2025). Analysis of mortality and cost implications in aspiration pneumonia: A retrospective study. The European Research Journal, Volume: 11 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1548264

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Yoshimatsu Y, Melgaard D, Westergren A, Skrubbeltrang C, Smithard DG. The diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia in older persons: a systematic review. Eur Geriatr Med. 2022;13(5):1071-1080. doi: 10.1007/s41999-022-00689-3.
  2. Studer P, Räber G, Ott D, Candinas D, Schnüriger B. Risk factors for fatal outcome in surgical patients with postoperative aspiration pneumonia. Int J Surg. 2016;27:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.043.
  3. Taylor JK, Fleming GB, Singanayagam A, Hill AT, Chalmers JD. Risk factors for aspiration in community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of a hospitalized UK cohort. Am J Med. 2013;126(11):995-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.012.
  4. Langmore SE, Terpenning MS, Schork A, et al. Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: how important is dysphagia? Dysphagia. 1998;13(2):69-81. doi: 10.1007/PL00009559.
  5. Johnson JL, Hirsch CS. Aspiration pneumonia. Recognizing and managing a potentially growing disorder. Postgrad Med. 2003;113(3):99-102, 105-106, 111-112. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2003.03.1390.
  6. DiBardino DM, Wunderink RG. Aspiration pneumonia: a review of modern trends. J Crit Care. 2015;30(1):40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.07.011.
  7. Yanagita Y, Arizono S, Tawara Y, et al. The severity of nutrition and pneumonia predicts survival in patients with aspiration pneumonia: A retrospective observational study. Clin Respir J. 2022;16(7):522-532. doi: 10.1111/crj.13521.
  8. Finucane TE, Bynum JP. Use of tube feeding to prevent aspiration pneumonia. Lancet. 1996 Nov 23;348(9039):1421-1424. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03369-7. Erratum in: Lancet 1997;349(9048):364.
  9. Simpson AJ, Allen JL, Chatwin M, et al. BTS clinical statement on aspiration pneumonia. Thorax. 2023;78(Suppl 1):s3-s21. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219699.
  10. Teramoto S, Fukuchi Y, Sasaki H, et al. High incidence of aspiration pneumonia in community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients: a multicenter, prospective study in Japan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(3):577-579. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01597.x.
  11. Marin S, Serra-Prat M, Ortega O, Clavé P. Healthcare-related cost of oropharyngeal dysphagia and its complications pneumonia and malnutrition after stroke: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e031629. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031629.
  12. Attrill S, White S, Murray J, Hammond S, Doeltgen S. Impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on healthcare cost and length of stay in hospital: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3376-3.