Journals / ADALYA / 2020 / Sayı: 23

The Galena Objects from Neolithic Ulucak: The Earliest Metallic Finds in Western Turkey

Journal
ADALYA
Pages
7–23
Publication Date
2020-11-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, galena finds from Ulucak Höyük suggest that at first this raw material seemed to have been perceived as an exotic “stone”, while a full understanding of its properties may have been developed later.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The earliest metal finds in central and eastern Anatolia are small copper and malachite beads dating from the 9th millennium BC onwards.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An analysis of metallic finds from Ulucak Höyük shows that galena was used at the site from the early 7th millennium BC to the early 6th millennium BC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, galena finds from Ulucak Höyük suggest that at first this raw material seemed to have been perceived as an exotic “stone”, while a full understanding of its properties may have been developed later.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:galena · Ulucak Höyük · Neolithic

Abstract

The earliest metal finds in central and eastern Anatolia are small copper and malachite beads dating from the 9th millennium BC onwards. However, the presence of metallic finds in Neolithic contexts from western Anatolia are rarely known. An analysis of metallic finds from Ulucak Höyük shows that galena was used at the site from the early 7th millennium BC to the early 6th millennium BC. Objects made of galena from initial phases at the site are considered personal ornaments, while an increasing number of galena lumps in relation to ovens were found in later phases. Thus, galena finds from Ulucak Höyük suggest that at first this raw material seemed to have been perceived as an exotic “stone”, while a full understanding of its properties may have been developed later.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİK, Ö., DİRİCAN, M., ULUBEY, A., VURUŞKAN, O. (2020). The Galena Objects from Neolithic Ulucak: The Earliest Metallic Finds in Western Turkey. ADALYA, Sayı: 23, 7–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/132633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Anthony, J.W., R.A. Bideaux, K.W. Bladh, and M.C. Nichols. 1990. Handbook of Mineralogy. Vol. 1, Elements, Sulfides, Sulfosalts. Tuscon, AZ: Mineral Data Publishing. Arbuckle, B.S., S.W. Kansa, E. Kansa, D. Orton et al. 2014. “Data Sharing Reveals Complexity in the Westward Spread of Domestic Animals across Neolithic Turkey.” PLOS ONE 9.6. https://journals. plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099845 Austin, R.J., R.M. Farquhar, and K.J. Walker. 2000. “Isotope Analysis of Galena from Prehistoric Sites in South Florida.” Anthropological Sciences 63.2:123-31.
  2. Bagley, J.M., and R. Schumann. 2013. “Materialized Prestige. Remarks on the Archaeological Research of Social Distinction Based on Case Studies of the Lake Hallstatt Golden Necklaces and Early La Téne Maskenfibeln.” In Interpretierte Eisenzeiten. Fallstudien, Methoden, Theorie. Tagungsbeiträge der 5. Linzer Gespräche zur interpretativen Eisenzeitarchäologie, edited by R. Karl and J. Leskovar, 123-36. Studien zur Kulturgeschichte von Oberösterreich 37. Linz: Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum. Begemann, F., E. Pernicka, and S. Schmitt-Strecker. 1994. “Metal Finds from Ilıpınar and the Advent of Arsenical Copper.” Anatolica 20:203-19.
  3. Birch, T., T. Rehren, and E. Pernicka. 2013. “The Metallic Finds from Çatalhöyük: A Review and Preliminary New Work.” In Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000-2008 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder, 307-16. British Institute at Ankara Monograph Series 48. London: British Institute at Ankara.
  4. Clark, N. 2015. “Fiery Arts: Pyrotechnology and the Political Aesthetics of the Anthropocene.” GeoHumanities 1.2: 266-84.
  5. Çakırlar, C. 2012. “The Evolution of Animal Husbandry in Neolithic Central-West Anatolia: The Zooarchaeological Record from Ulucak Höyük (c. 7040-5660 cal. BC, Izmir, Turkey).” AnatSt 62:1-33.
  6. Çevik, Ö., and E. Abay. 2016. “Neolithisation in Aegean Turkey: Towards a More Realistic Reading.” In Anatolian Metal 7: Anatolien und seine Nachbarn vor 10.000 Jahren/Anatolia and Neighbours 10,000 Years Ago, edited by Ü. Yalçın, 187-97. Der Anschnitt Suppl. 31. Veröffentlichungen aus dem Deutschen Bergbau-Museum Bochum 214. Bochum: Deutschen Bergbau-Museum. Çevik, Ö. 2016. “Neolithic Pottery Production Workshop at Ulucak Höyük, Western Turkey: Evidence for a Full Production Sequence.” Antiquity 90.350. https://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/cevik350.
  7. Çevik, Ö. 2019. “Changing Ideologies in Community-Making through the Neolithic Period at Ulucak.”