SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Effects of Berberis vulgaris L. Extract on the Physicochemical, Sensory, and Textural Properties of Beef Patties

Berberis vulgaris L. Ekstraktının Dana Köftelerinin Fizikokimyasal, Duyusal ve Tekstürel Özelliklerine Etkisi

Kübra Çinar Topçu(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, AYDINTEPE MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, GIDA İŞLEME BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-3715-8739
Pages
127–135
Publication Date
2025-03-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that the extract does not significantly alter the patties' properties but reduces lipid oxidation and enhances textural attributes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of adding Berberis vulgaris L. fruit extract to beef patties on physicochemical, sensory, texture and safety features were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The addition of the extract did not cause a significant change in the approximate composition of the patties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that the extract does not significantly alter the patties' properties but reduces lipid oxidation and enhances textural attributes.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Berberis vulgaris L. ekstraktı · Dana köfte kalite parametreleri · Antioksidan kapasite

Abstract

The effects of adding Berberis vulgaris L. fruit extract to beef patties on physicochemical, sensory, texture and safety features were investigated. The addition of the extract did not cause a significant change in the approximate composition of the patties. It had a significant effect on the pH value in all groups (P 0.05). While no significant difference was observed for the color values, cooking caused a fall in L*, a* and b* values. Cooking yield had a significant effect in all groups (P<0.01). The use of Berberis extract in patties reduced the cooking yield. The addition of the extract did not change the sensory features of the patties by a significant degree. Additionally, texture analysis showed very significant effects of hardness, gumminess and chewiness values in all groups (P<0.01). The findings indicate that the extract does not significantly alter the patties' properties but reduces lipid oxidation and enhances textural attributes. This study supports the potential use of Berberis vulgaris L. extract as a natural additive to improve the quality of beef patties.

Özet

Berberis vulgaris L. meyve ekstraktının dana köftelerine eklenmesinin fizikokimyasal, duyusal, doku ve güvenlik özelliklerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Ekstraktın eklenmesi köftelerin yaklaşık bileşiminde önemli bir değişikliğe neden olmamıştır. Tüm gruplarda pH değeri üzerinde önemli bir etkisi olmuştur (P 0.05). Renk değerlerinde önemli bir fark gözlenmezken, pişirme L*, a* ve b* değerlerinde düşüşe neden olmuştur. Pişirme verimi tüm gruplarda önemli bir etkiye sahip olmuştur (P<0.01). Berberis ekstraktının köftelerde kullanılması pişirme verimini azaltmıştır. Ekstraktın eklenmesi, köftelerin duyusal özelliklerinde önemli bir değişikliğe neden olmamıştır. Ayrıca, tekstür analizi tüm gruplarda sertlik, sakızlık ve çiğneme değerleri üzerinde çok önemli etkiler göstermiştir (P<0.01). Bulgular, ekstraktın köftelerin özelliklerini önemli ölçüde değiştirmediğini, ancak lipid oksidasyonunu azalttığını ve dokusal özellikleri geliştirdiğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, Berberis vulgaris L. ekstraktının dana köftelerinin kalitesini iyileştirmek için doğal bir katkı maddesi olarak potansiyel kullanımını desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Topçu, K. Ç. (2025). Effects of Berberis vulgaris L. Extract on the Physicochemical, Sensory, and Textural Properties of Beef Patties. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1520203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Wells JC, Marphatia AA, Amable G, Siervo M, Friis H, Miranda JJ, et al. The future of human malnutrition: rebalancing agency for better nutritional health. Globalization and health. 2021;17(1):1-25.
  2. Lee HJ, Yong HI, Kim M, Choi YS, Jo C. Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market—A review. AJAS. 2020;33(10):1533.
  3. Ogundipe OO, Fasogbon BM, Ayeke AO, Nwosu PN, Adebayo-Oyetoro AO, Faloye OR. Quality evaluation of beef patties formulated with wheat and sweet potato flour blends. Food Sci Appl Biotechnol. 2023;6(2):187-199.
  4. Majeed T, Maqbool N, Sajad A, Aijaz T, Khan ZS. Meat as a functional food for health. ın functional foods. 1st Ed. CRC Press; 2024.
  5. Meng X, Wu D, Zhang Z, Wang H, Wu P, Xu Z, et al. An overview of factors affecting the quality of beef meatballs: Processing and preservation. Food Scı Nutr. 2022;10(6):1961-1974.
  6. Ergezer H, Serdaroğlu M. Antioxidant potential of artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) byproducts extracts in raw beef patties during refrigerated storage. J Food Meas Charact. 2018;12:982-991.
  7. Manessis G, Kalogianni AI, Lazou T, Moschovas M, Bossis I, Gelasakis AI. Plant-derived natural antioxidants in meat and meat products. Antioxidants. 2020; 9(12):1215.
  8. Kirkyol M, Akköse A. Effects of animal fat replacement with almond flour on quality parameters of beef patties. Food Scı Nutr. 2023;11(11):7091-7099.
  9. Karre L, Lopez K, Getty KJK. Natural antioxidants in meat and poultry products. Meat Sci. 2013;94:220–227.
  10. Falowo AB, Fayemi PO, Muchenje V. Natural antioxidants against lipid-protein oxidative deterioration in meat and meat products: a review. Food Res Int. 2014;64:171–181.
  11. Yang L, Zhang Z, Hu X, You L, Khan RAA, Yu Y. Phenolic contents, organic acids, and the antioxidant and bio activity of wild medicinal Berberis plants-as sustainable sources of functional food. Molecules. 2022;27(8):2497.
  12. Gacche RN, Dhole NA. Antioxidant and possible anti-inflammatory potential of selected medicinal plants prescribed in the Indian traditional system of medicine. Pharm Biol. 2006;44:389–395.
  13. Gruenwald J, Brendler T, Jaenicke C. PDR for herbal medicines fourth edition. Thomson; 2007.
  14. Sobhani Z, Akaberi M, Amiri MS, Ramezani M, Emami SA, Sahebkar A. Medicinal species of the genus Berberis: a review of their traditional and ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Pharmacological Properties of Plant-Derived Natural Products and Implications for Human Health, 2021;547-577.
  15. Blumenthal M, Busse WR, Goldbert A, Gruenwald J, Hall T, Klein SR. The complete German E monographs-therapeutic guide to herbal medicines. American Botanical Council, Austin, TX;1998.
  16. Deliorman Orhan D, Hartevioglu A, Kupeli E, Yesilada E. In vivo anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of the crude extract and fractions from Rosa canina L. fruits. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;112:394–400.
  17. Kasımoğlu C, Uysal H. Farklı test sistemleri ile somatik hücrelerde profenofos genotoksisitesine karşı kuşburnu (Rosa canina L.) ekstrelerinin doğal bir antigenotoksik ajan olarak kullanılması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi (CFD), 2016;37:1.
  18. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ. In vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India. LWT. 2007;40(2):344-352.
  19. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radıcal Bıo Med.1999;26(9-10):1231-1237.
  20. McDonald S, Prenzler PD, Antolovich M, Robards K. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chem. 2001;73(1):73-84.
  21. AOAC. Meat and meat products. Chapter 39. In W. Horwitz (Ed.), Official methods of analysis (18th ed., pp. 8). AOAC International; 2005.
  22. Gökalp HY, Kaya M, Tülek Y, Zorba O. Et ürünlerinde kalite kontrolü ve laboratuar uygulama klavuzu (4. Baskı). Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları, Yayın No: 751. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 318, Atatürk Üniviversitesi Ofset Tesisi, Erzurum. 2010.
  23. Lemon DW. An improved TBA test for rancidity new series circular. No:51.Halifax-Laboratory, Halifax, Nova Scotia;1975.
  24. Murphy EW, Criner PE, Gray BC. Comparisons of methods for calculating retentions of nutrients in cooked foods. J Agric Food Chem.1975;23(6):1153-1157.
  25. Ismail SAS, Deak T, Abd El-Rahman HA, Yassien MAM, Beuchat LR. Presence and changes in populations of yeasts on raw and processed poultry products stored at refrigeration temperature. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000;62(1-2):113-121.
  26. Santos MHS. Amino acid decarboxylase capability of microorganisms isolated in Spanish fermented meat products. Int J Food Microbiol. 1998;39(3):227-230.
  27. Reihani SFS, Tan T-C, Huda N, Easa AM. Frozen storage stability of beef patties incorporated with extracts from ulam raja leaves (Cosmos caudatus). Food Chem. 2014;155:17-23.
  28. Bourne MC. Texture profile analysis. Food Technol. 1978;32:62-66.
  29. Och, A, Olech M, Bąk K, Kanak S, Cwener A, Cieśla M, et al. Evaluation of the antioxidant and anti-lipoxygenase activity of Berberis vulgaris L. leaves, fruits, and stem and their LC MS/MS polyphenolic profile. Antioxidants. 2023;12(7):1467.
  30. Gündoğdu M. Determination of Antioxidant Capacities and Biochemical Compounds of Berberis vulgaris L. Fruits. AEB. 2013;7(2):344-348.
  31. Ozgen M, Saraçoglu O, Geçer EN. Antioxidant capacity and chemical properties of selected barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) fruits. HEB. 2012;53(6):447–451.
  32. Yildiz H, Ercisli S, Sengul M. Topdas EF, Beyhan O, Cakir O, et al. Some physicochemical characteristics, bioactive content and antioxidant characteristics of non-sprayed barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) fruits from Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2014;56(4):123–129.
  33. Eroğlu AY, Çakır Ö, Sağdıç M, Dertli E. Bioactive characteristics of wild Berberis vulgaris and Berberis crataegina fruits. J Chem. 2020;1-9.
  34. Ersoy N, Kupe M, Sagbas HI, Ercisli S. Physicochemical diversity among barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) fruits from eastern Anatolia. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 2018;46(2):336–342.
  35. Motalleb G, Hanachi PS, Kua H, Othman F, Asmah R. Evaluation of phenolic content and total antioxidant activity in Berberis vulgaris fruit extract. J Biol Sci. 2005;5(5):648–653.
  36. Çağlar M, Demirci M. Üzümsü meyvelerde bulunan fenolik bileşikler ve beslenmedeki önemi. EJOSA. 2017;7(11):18-26.
  37. Gökçen İS, Keskin N. Asmanın UV (ultraviyole) stresine yanıtları. In: Türkoğlu N, Cantürk S editörs. Ziraat ve doğa bilimleri. 1st ed. Cetinje-Karadağ: Ivpe; 2020. P. 1-18.
  38. Erdoğan B, Özdestan‐Ocak Ö. Inhibitory effects of carob and propolis extracts on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in beef patties cooked with different methods. J Food Process Pres. 2022;46(7):16623.
  39. Sheridan PS, Shilton NC. Analysis of yield while cooking beef-burger patties using far infrared radiation. J Food Eng. 2002;51:3–11.
  40. Del Pulgar JS, Gázquez A, Ruiz-Carrascal J. Physico-chemical, textural and structural characteristics of sous-vide cooked pork cheeks as affected by vacuum, cooking temperature, and cooking time. Meat Sci. 2012;90(3):828-835.
  41. Puolanne EJ, Ruusunen MH, Vainionpää JI. Combined effects of NaCl and raw meat pH on water-holding in cooked sausage with and without added phosphate. Meat Sci. 2001;58(1):1-7.
  42. Choi YS, Sung JM, Park JD, Hwang KE, Lee CW, Kim TK, et al. Quality and sensory characteristics of reduced fat chicken patties with pork back fat replaced by dietary fiber from wheat sprout. Korean J Food Scı An. 2016;36(6):799–806.
  43. Ahn J, Grün IU. Heterocyclic amines: 2. Inhibitory effects of natural extracts on the formation of polar and nonpolar heterocyclic amines in cooked beef. J Food Scı. 2005;70(4):C263-C268.
  44. Mahapatra G, Biswas S, Banerjee R. Improving the quality and shelf-life of chevon meatballs by incorporating fruit and fruit by-products. Indian J Anim Sci. 2021;90:1655-1662.
  45. Blackburn CW. ‘Microbiological testing in food safety and quality’. Mead, G. (Ed.) Microbiological analysis of red meat, poultry and eggs. management’ Woodhead Publishing; 2006.
  46. Pietrasik Z, Li-Chan ECY. Binding and textural properties of beef gels as affected by protein, κ-carrageenan and microbial transglutaminase addition. Food Res Int. 2002;35(1):91-98.
  47. Turp GY, Icier F, Kor G. Influence of infrared final cooking on color, texture and cooking characteristics of ohmically pre-cooked meatball. Meat Sci. 2016;114: 46-53.
  48. Naveena BM, Muthukumar M, Sen AR, Babji Y, Murthy TRK. Quality characteristics and storage stability of chicken patties formulated with finger millet flour (Eleusine coracana). J Muscle Foods. 2006;17(1):92-104.
  49. Naveena BM, Sen AR, Vaithiyanathan S, Babji Y, Kondaiah N. Comparative efficacy of pomegranate juice, pomegranate rind powder extract and BHT as antioxidants in cooked chicken patties. Meat Sci, 2008;80(4):1304-1308.
  50. Bouarab-Chibane L, Ouled-Bouhedda B, Leonard L, Gemelas L, Bouajila J, Ferhout H, et al. Preservation of fresh ground beef patties using plant extracts combined with a modified atmosphere packaging. Eur Food Res Technol. 2017;243:1997-2009.
  51. Atacan K. Polifenollerle fonksiyonelleştirilmiş Fe3O4 nanopartiküllerine tripsin ımmobilizasyonu ve sindirim uygulaması. Doktora Tezi. Sakarya Universitesi Türkiye. 2016.
  52. Mahapatra G, Biswas S, Patra G, Vidyarthi AK. Enhancement of storage stability, textural profile, physico-chemical parameters and sensory attributes of chevon meatballs by guava powder incorporation. IJBSM, 2019;10(4):346-351.
  53. Salejda AM, Kucharska AZ, Krasnowska G. Effect of Cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) juice on selected quality properties of beef burgers. J Food Qual. 2018;(1):1563651.
  54. Olkiewicz M, Tyszkiewicz S, Wawrzyniewicz M. Effect of basic chemical composition and functional additives on rheological characteristics of selected meat products, Acta Agrophysica. 2007;9:147–169.
  55. Choi YS, Choi JH, Kim HY, Kim HW, Lee MA, Chung HJ, et al. Effect of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) leaf powder on the quality characteristics of chicken patties in refrigerated storage. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2011;31(1):9-18.