SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yükseköğretim Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of clinical competence in medical education

Tıp Eğitiminde Klinik Yeterliliğin Değerlendirilmesi

ÖZLEM SERPİL ÇAKMAKKAYA
Pages
39–45
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, different test methods designed to measure competency in clinical skills and attitudes in medical education are introduced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although traditionally the main focus of medical education is to teach intensive conceptual knowledge, medical schools increasingly pay attention to the conveyance of clinical skills and attitudes that are required to become an excellent and complete physicians.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Medical programs are obliged to assess the learning progress of their medical students with exams.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, different test methods designed to measure competency in clinical skills and attitudes in medical education are introduced.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Klinik yeterlilik · ölçme ve değerlendirme · tıp eğitimi.

Abstract

Although traditionally the main focus of medical education is to teach intensive conceptual knowledge, medical schools increasingly pay attention to the conveyance of clinical skills and attitudes that are required to become an excellent and complete physicians. Medical programs are obliged to assess the learning progress of their medical students with exams. Clinical skills or professional attitudes need wide range of different types of exams to be assessed. The search for a valid and reliable assessment of clinical skills and attitudes continues for a long time. In this article, different test methods designed to measure competency in clinical skills and attitudes in medical education are introduced.

Özet

Geleneksel tıp eğitiminde yoğun kavramsal bilginin öğretilmesine odaklanılmış olmasına rağmen günümüzde tıp fakülteleri mükemmel ve tam donanımlı doktorlar yetiştirmek için gerekli olan klinik beceri ve tutumların öğretilmesi konusunda giderek daha fazla dikkat göstermektedir. Tıp programları öğrencilerinin öğrenme düzeylerindeki ilerlemeyi sınavlarla değerlendirmek zorundadırlar. Bu bağlamda klinik beceriler ya da profesyonel davranışları değerlendirmek için farklı türlerde sınavları içeren geniş bir sınav yelpazesine ihtiyaç vardır. Klinik becerilerin ve tutumların nasıl geçerli ve güvenilir bir şekilde değerlendirileceğine yönelik arayışlar uzun süredir devam etmektedir. Bu makalede tıp eğitiminde klinik beceri ve tutum alanındaki yeterliliklerin ölçülmesinde kullanılabilecek farklı sınav yöntemleri tanıtılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAKKAYA, Ö. S. (2017). Assessment of clinical competence in medical education. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 39–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/132054

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. ABIM (2016). Mini-CEX. Examples of clinical skills evaluated. 31 Ağustos 2016 tarihinde adresinden erişildi. Anderson, M., Cohen, J., Hallock, J., Kassebaum, D., Turnbull, J., and Whitcomb, M. (1999). Learning objectives for medical student educa- tion – Guidelines for medical schools: Report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Academic Medicine, 74(1), 13–18.
  2. Archer, J., Lynn, N., Coombes, L., Roberts, M., Gale, T., and Regan de Bere, S. (2016). The medical licensing examination debate. Regulation & Governance. doi:10.1111/rego.12118 Barrows, H. S. (1993). An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Academic Medicine, 68(6), 443–451.
  3. Batalden, P., Leach, D., Swing, S., Dreyfus, H., and Dreyfus, S. (2002). General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Affairs, 21(5), 103–111.
  4. Birden, H., Glass, N., Wilson, I., Harrison, M., Usherwood, T., and Nass, D. (2013). Teaching professionalism in medical education: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25. Medical Teacher, 35(7), e1252–e1266. Casey, P. M., Goepfert, A. R., Espey, E. L., Hammoud, M. M., Kaczmarczyk, J. M., Katz, N. T., and Peskin, E.; Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education Committee. (2009). To the point: reviews in medical educa- tion – The Objective Structured Clinical Examination. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 200(1), 25–34.
  5. CanMEDS (2015). Physician competency framework. 31 Ağustos 2016 tari- hinde adresinden eri- şildi. Cruess, S. R., and Cruess, R. L. (1997). Professionalism must be taught. British Medical Journal, 315(7123), 1674–1677.
  6. Cruess, R., Mcllroy JH, Cruess S., Ginsburg S., Steinert Y. (2006). The professionalism mini-evaluation exercise: a preliminary investigation. Academic Medicine 81(10): S74-S78. David, M. F. B., Davis, M., Harden, R., Howie, P., Ker, J., and Pippard, M. (2001). AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: Portfolios as a method of student assessment. Medical Teacher, 23(6), 535–551.
  7. Davies, H., Khera, N., and Stroobant, J. (2005). Portfolios, appraisal, reval- idation, and all that: A user’s guide for consultants. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90(2), 165–170.
  8. Davis, M., Ben-David, M. F., Harden, R., Howie, P., Ker, J., McGhee, C., and Snadden, D. (2001). Portfolio assessment in medical students' final examinations. Medical Teacher, 23(4), 357–366.
  9. Durning, S. J., Cation, L