Journals / Yükseköğretim Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Sharing the knowledge: A review of fundamentals of scientific writing

Bilgiyi Paylaşmak: Biyomedikal Alanda Bilimsel Makale Yazım Kuralları ile İlgili Derleme

Pages
142–150
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article addresses the young scientists and is meant to provide some basic recommendations on scientific writing as a starting point for the development of a proper scientific manuscript.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Scientific publications are of very high importance for every young researcher.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sharing the results of scientific work with a broad audience enhances knowledge and understanding of the topic as well as it might stimulate further research within the field.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article addresses the young scientists and is meant to provide some basic recommendations on scientific writing as a starting point for the development of a proper scientific manuscript.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilimsel yazı · yayımlamak · eş değerlendirme.

Abstract

Scientific publications are of very high importance for every young researcher. Sharing the results of scientific work with a broad audience enhances knowledge and understanding of the topic as well as it might stimulate further research within the field. Furthermore, well respected publications are the foundation of career advancement for each individual scientist. Poor presentation of data and results often causes manuscript rejection from journal editors and scientific reviewers and might lead to low impact publication or no publication at all. Despite that correlation the art of scientific writing is rarely part of our curricula for higher education. This article addresses the young scientists and is meant to provide some basic recommendations on scientific writing as a starting point for the development of a proper scientific manuscript.

Özet

Bilimsel yayınlar her araştırmacı için büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bilimsel çalışma sonuçlarının geniş kitlelerle paylaşılması bilgiyi arttırıp konunun anlaşılmasını sağladığı gibi kendi alanında yeni çalışmaların yapılmasına da öncülük eder. Ayrıca saygın yayınlar üretmek araştırmacıların mesleksel ilerlemesine katkıda bulunur. Bilimsel çalışma verilerinin ve sonuçlarının yeterli şeklide sunulmaması makalenin dergi editörleri ve hakemler tarafından reddedilmesine ya da yayın kalitesinin düşük olmasına neden olacaktır. Bilimsel makale yazma sanatı bu kadar önemli olmasına rağmen bu konuya ait eğitim programları yüksek öğretim müfredatlarında yeterince yer almamaktadır. Bu makalede özellikle yazma sürecinin başında olan öğrenci ve genç akademisyenlere bilimsel yazı yazma konusunda bazı temel bilgilerin sunulması amaçlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAKKAYA, Ö. S. (2013). Sharing the knowledge: A review of fundamentals of scientific writing. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 142–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/132353

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Annesley, T. M. (2010). Bring your best to the table. Clinical Chemistry, 56(10), 1528-1534.
  2. Annesley, T. M. (2011). Giving credit: Citations and references. Clinical Chemistry, 57(1), 14-17.
  3. Byrne, D. W. (2000). Common reasons for rejecting manuscripts at medical journals: a survey of editors and peer reviewers. Science Editor, 23(2), 39-44.
  4. Cargill, M., & O'Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles: strategy and steps. New York: Blackwell. Chanut, F. (2006). How to write: Discussion. 7 May›s 2013 tarihinde adresinden eriflildi. Çak›r, B. (2012). Epidemiyolojide s›k rastlanan yanl›l›klar, H. Yaz›c› (Ed.) Romatolojide klinik araflt›rmalar ve nesnel t›p V (s. 23-28). ‹stanbul: Deomed Çakmakkaya, Ö. S. (2012). Bilimsel kan›ta ulaflmak: Biyomedikal veri tabanlar› ile ilgili derleme. Yüksekö¤retim Dergisi, 2(2), 104-108.
  5. Davidoff, F. (2000). Who's the author? Problems with biomedical authorship, and some possible solutions. Science Editor, 23(4), 111- 119. Derish, P., & Eastwood, S. (2008). A clarity clinic for surgical writing. Journal of Surgical Research, 147(1), 50-58.
  6. Form, A. (2005). Jama instructions for authors. JAMA 294(1),119-127.
  7. Gardner, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 292(6522), 746. Hall, G. M., & Sestak, Z. (2003). How to write a paper? New York: Wiley. Hernandez, D. A., El-Masri, M. M., & Hernandez, C. A. (2008). Choosing and using citation and bibliographic database software (BDS). The Diabetes Educator, 34(3), 457-474.
  8. Hulley, S. B. (2007). Designing clinical research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ICMJE (2010). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. 12 Aral›k 2012 tarihinde Kallestinova, E. D. (2011). How to write your first research paper. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 84(3), 181. Kern, M. K., & Hensley, M. K. (2011). Citation management software. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(3), 204-208.
  9. Kotsis, S. V., & Chung, K. C. (2010). A guide for writing in the scientific forum. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126(5), 1763. Peat, J., Elliott, E., Baur, L., & Keena, V. (2007). Scientific writing: easy when you know how. London: BMJ Books. Pierson, D. J. (2004). The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Respiratory Care, 49(10), 1246-1252.
  10. Zeiger, M. (2000). Essentials of writing biomedical research papers.