SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2024 / Volume: 11 Issue: 4

Evaluation of Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivars for Resistance to Soybean Mosaic Virus

Soya Fasulyesi (Glycine max) Çeşitlerinin Soybean Mosaic Virus’a Dayanıklılık Durumlarının Belirlenmesi

Abdullah Baltacı(KARADENIZ TARIMSAL ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0002-0309-5215
İlyas Deligöz(KARADENİZ TARIMSAL ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0003-3646-300X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-10-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The resistant cultivars identified in this study can be recommended in soybean growing areas of Türkiye where SMV is a problem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is one of the most prevalent and devastating viral pathogens of soybean worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 33 soybean cultivars registered in Turkiye were tested to SMV under controlled conditions in 2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The resistant cultivars identified in this study can be recommended in soybean growing areas of Türkiye where SMV is a problem.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Resistance · SMV · Soybean

Abstract

Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is one of the most prevalent and devastating viral pathogens of soybean worldwide. The use of resistant varieties is one of the most effective ways for virus control. In this study, 33 soybean cultivars registered in Turkiye were tested to SMV under controlled conditions in 2023. A local isolate SMV-STk isolated from a soybean plant in Samsun province of Turkiye was used to assess the reaction of soybean cultivars to SMV. Ten young seedlings of each cultivar were mechanically inoculated with the virus, and the plants were evaluated according to symptomatic appearance of virus infection 21 days after inoculation. Also, virus presence or absence was confirmed by double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA). As a result of this study, 28 of 33 cultivars tested became systemically infected with SMV, and the virus was detected in these plants. On the other hand, 5 cultivars were found to be resistant to SMV, and their resistance was confirmed by DAS-ELISA. The resistant cultivars identified in this study can be recommended in soybean growing areas of Türkiye where SMV is a problem.

Özet

Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) soyanın en yaygın ve tahripkar viral patojenlerinden bir tanesidir. Virüsün kontrolünde dayanıklı çeşit kullanmak en etkili mücadele yöntemlerindendir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de tescil edilmiş olan 33 soya çeşidi 2023 yılında kontrollü koşullarda SMV’ye karşı test edilmiştir. Soya çeşitlerinin SMV’ye karşı reaksiyonlarının belirlenmesinde Samsun ilinde soya bitkisinden izole edilen SMV-STk izolatı kullanılmıştır. Her çeşide ait 10 soya bitkisi, virüs ile mekanik olarak inokule edilmiş ve inokulasyondan 21 gün sonra belirti oluşumuna göre bitkiler değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca bitkilerdeki virüs varlığı ya da yokluğu DAS-ELISA testi ile belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda 33 çeşitten 28 tanesi SMV ile sistemik olarak enfekteli hale gelmiş ve bu çeşitlerde DAS-ELISA (Double Antibody Sandwich Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) testi ile virüs tespit edilmiştir. Diğer yandan 5 çeşit SMV’ye karşı dayanıklı olarak bulunmuş ve dayanıklılık durumları DAS-ELISA testi ile doğrulanmıştır. Bu çalışmada SMV’ye dayanıklı olarak belirlenen çeşitler, Türkiye’de SMV’nin sorun olduğu soya üretim alanlarında önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Baltacı, A., Deligöz, İ. (2024). Evaluation of Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivars for Resistance to Soybean Mosaic Virus. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 11 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1465085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Anderson N.R., Irizarry M.D., Bloomingdale C.A., Smith D.L., Bradley C.A., Delaney D.P., Kleczewski N.M., Sikora E.J., Mueller D.S. ve Wise K.A. 2017. Effect of soybean vein necrosis on yield and seed quality of soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 39: 334–341.
  2. Arıoğlu, H. 2007. Yağ Bitkileri Yetiştirme ve Islahı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yayın No:220. Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-70, Adana, 204 s.
  3. Bashar, T. 2015. Characterization of seed transmission of Soybean mosaic virus in soybean. The University of Western Ontario (Canada).
  4. Belkhadir Y., Subramaniam R. ve Dangl J.L. 2004. Plant disease resistance protein signaling: NBS-LRR proteins and their partners. Current Opinion Plant Biology, 7(4): 391–399.
  5. Brunt, A.A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M.J., Gibbs, A.J. ve Watson, L. 1996. Viruses of plants descriptions and lists from the VIDE Database; CAB International: Wallingford, UK. 1484 s.
  6. Buss, G.R., Ma, G., Chen, P. ve Tolin, S.A. 1997. Registration of V94-5152 soybean germplasm resistant to Soybean mosaic potyvirus. Crop Science, 37:1987–1988.
  7. Buzzell, R.I. ve Tu, J.C. 1989. Inheritance of a soybean stem-tip necrosis reaction to Soybean mosaic virus. Journal of Heredity, 80: 400–401.
  8. Clark M.F. ve Adams A.N. 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34(3): 475-483.
  9. Chen, P., Buss, G.R. ve Tolin, S.A. 2004. Reaction of soybean to single and double inoculation with different Soybean mosaic virus strains. Crop Protection, 23(10): 965-971.
  10. Chen, P.Y. ve Choi, C.W. 2008. Soybean mosaic virus. “Alınmıştır: Characterization, Diagnosis & Management of Plant Viruses, 1:389-422.
  11. Cho, E.K. ve Goodman, R.M. 1979. Strains of soybean mosaic virus: classification based on virulence in resistant soybean cultivars. Phytopathology, 69(5): 467-470.
  12. Deligoz, I. ve Sevik, M.A. 2018. Soybean mosaic virus and Cucumber mosaic virus infections on soybean in Samsun province of Turkey. International Congress on Engineering and Life Sciences, 26-29 April, 2018, Kastamonu.
  13. Eggenberger, A.L., Stark, D.M. ve Beachy, R.N. 1989. The nucleotide sequence of a soybean mosaic virus coat protein-coding region and its expression in Escherichia coli, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and tobacco callus. Journal of General Virology, 70(7): 1853-1860.
  14. FAO, 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL Erişim Tarihi:19.03.2024.
  15. Fidan U. ve Yorganci U. 1989. Investigations on the detection and seed transmission of the virus diseases occurring on the pulse crops in Aegean Region. I. The identification of viruses infecting pulse crops in Aegean Region. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology, 18: 93-105.
  16. Gunduz, I., Buss, G.R., Chen, P. ve Tolin, S.A. 2004. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Soybean mosaic virus resistance in PI 88788 soybean. Phytopathology, 94: 687–692.
  17. Hajimorad M.R., Domier L.L., Tolin S.A., Whitham S.A. ve Saghai Maroof M.A. 2018. Soybean mosaic virus: a successful potyvirus with a wide distribution but restricted natural host range. Molecular Plant Pathology, 19(7): 1563-1579.
  18. Hill, J.H. 1999. Soybean mosaic. In: Hartman, G.L., Sinclair, J.B., Rupe, J.C. (Eds.), Compendium of Soybean Diseases, 4th Edition. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, 70–71 s.
  19. Hill, J.H., Whitham S.A., 2014. Control of virus diseases in soybeans. In Advances in Virus Research, 90: 355–390.
  20. Jeong, R. D., Lim, W.S., Kwon, S.W. ve Kim, K.H. 2005. Identification of Glycine max genes expressed in response to Soybean mosaic virus infection. Plant Pathology, 21: 47-54.
  21. Jezewska, M., Trzmiel, K., Zarzynska-Nowak, A. ve Lewandowska, M. 2015. Identification of soybean mosaic virus in Poland. Journal of Plant Pathology, 97(2): 357-362.
  22. Kiihl, R.A.S. ve Hartwig, E.E. 1979. Inheritance of reaction to soybean mosaic virus in soybeans. Crop Science, 19: 372–375.
  23. Klepadlo, M., Chen, P., Shi, A., Mason, R.E., Korth, K.L. ve Srivastava, V. 2017. Single nucleotide polymorphism markers for rapid detection of the Rsv4 locus for Soybean mosaic virus resistance in diverse germplasm. Moleculer Breeding, 37: 10–21.
  24. Li, K., Yang, Q.H., Zhi, H.J. ve Gai, J.Y. 2010. Identification and distribution of Soybean mosaic virus strains in Southern China. Plant Disease, 94: 351–357.
  25. Li, M., Seo, E.Y., Cho, S., Kim, J., Chung, J., Lim, H.L., Gotoh, T., Hammond, J. ve Lim, H.S.A. 2015. A 2014 Nation wide survey of the distribution of Soybean mosaic virus (SMV), Soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus (SYMMV), and Soybean yellow common mosaic virus (SYCMV) major viruses in South Korean soybean fields, and changes from 2012 isolate prevalence. Journal of The Faculty Agriculture Kyushu University, 60: 339–347.
  26. Ma, G., Chen, P., Buss, G.R. ve Tolin, S.A. 2003. Genetic study of a lethal necrosis to soybean mosaic virus in PI 507389 soybean. Journal of Heredity, 94(3): 205-211.
  27. Nandakishor, H.V., Praful Kumar ve Mane, S.S. 2017. Symptomatology studies of Soybean mosaic disease. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6(4): 870-875.
  28. Öztürk, F., Kızılgeçi, F. ve Eliçin, A. 2021. Şırnak ili koşullarında soya bitkisinin II. ürün olarak yetiştirilebilme olanaklarının araştırılması. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, 10 (1): 190-198.
  29. Shakiba, E., Chen, P., Gergerich, R., Li, S., Dombek, D., Brye, K. ve Shi, A. 2012. Reactions of commercial soybean cultivars from the Mid South to Soybean mosaic virus. Crop science, 52(5): 1990-1997.
  30. Shi, A., Chen, P., Li, D., Zheng, C., Zhang, B. ve Hou, A. 2009. Pyramiding multiple genes for resistance to Soybean mosaic virus in soybean using molecular markers. Molecular Breeding, 23: 113–124.
  31. Shi, A., Chen, P., Vierling, R., Li, D. ve Zheng, C. 2013. Identification of Soybean mosaic virus resistance alleles in Jindou 1 soybean. Euphytica, 192: 181-187.
  32. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı verileri 2024. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Sayfalar/Detay.aspx ?SayfaId=85 (Erişim Tarihi:19.03.2024)
  33. Tolin, S.A. ve Lacy, G.H. 2004. Viral, bacterial, and phytoplasmal diseases of soybean. “Alınmıştır: Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, 16: 765-819.
  34. Tran, P.T., Widyasari, K., Seo, J.K. ve Kim, K.H. 2018. Isolation and validation of a candidate Rsv3 gene from a soybean genotype that confers strain-specific resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Virology, 513: 153–159.
  35. Usovsky, M., Chen, P., Li, D., Wang, A., Shi, A., Zheng, C., Shakiba, E., Lee, D., Vieira, C.C., Lee, Y.C., Wu, C., Cervantez, I. ve Dong D. 2022. Decades of genetic research on Soybean mosaic virus resistance in soybean. Viruses, 14(6): 1122.
  36. Wang, Y., Hobbs, H.A., Hill, C.B., Domier, L.L., Hartman, G.L. ve Nelson, R.L. 2005. Evaluation of ancestral lines of US soybean cultivars for resistance to four soybean viruses. Crop science, 45(2): 639-644.
  37. Wang, Y., Hobbs, H.A., Bowen, C.R., Bernard, R.L., Hill, C.B., Haudenshield, J.S., Domier, L.L. ve Hartman, G.L. 2006. Evaluation of soybean cultivars, ‘Williams’ isogenic lines, and other selected soybean lines for resistance to two Soybean mosaic virus strains. Crop science, 46(6): 2649-2653.
  38. Widyasari, K., Alazem, M. ve Kim, K.H. 2020. Soybean resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Plants, 9(2): 219.