SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 12 Issue: 4

Structural Characteristics and Problems of Dairy Cattle Farms in Manyas District of Balıkesir Province

Damla Özsayın(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS)0000-0003-1127-267X
Hande Işıl Akbağ(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ZOOTECHNICS)0000-0002-7325-4453
Zihni Kocaoğlan0009-0006-6353-8133
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-10-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it is expected that the research findings will contribute to the improvement of the structural characteristics of farms in the district, the determination of the problems related to dairy cattle activities and the policy and decision makers in the applications related to this activity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine the structural characteristics and problems of dairy cattle farms in Manyas district of Balıkesir province.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main material of the study consists of data obtained through a survey from 125 dairy farmers determined by stratified random sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is expected that the research findings will contribute to the improvement of the structural characteristics of farms in the district, the determination of the problems related to dairy cattle activities and the policy and decision makers in the applications related to this activity.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Livestock supports · likert scale · artificial insemination

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the structural characteristics and problems of dairy cattle farms in Manyas district of Balıkesir province. The main material of the study consists of data obtained through a survey from 125 dairy farmers determined by stratified random sampling method. The research data covers February and March 2024. Descriptive statistics and the five-point likert scale method were used in the analysis of the study data. The study results revealed that 96% of farmers were male, the average age was 48.5, the average education level was 8.8 years, the average household size was 4.2 people and the average dairy farming experience was 22 years. Also, the most important problem related to dairy farming activities in farms has been determined as inadequate livestock supports. This is followed by problems such as ineffective unions or cooperatives, high prices of roughage and concentrated feed, inability to compete with corporate-sized farms and failure of artificial insemination. As a result, it is expected that the research findings will contribute to the improvement of the structural characteristics of farms in the district, the determination of the problems related to dairy cattle activities and the policy and decision makers in the applications related to this activity.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özsayın, D., Akbağ, H. I., Kocaoğlan, Z. (2025). Structural Characteristics and Problems of Dairy Cattle Farms in Manyas District of Balıkesir Province. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1695724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Alkan, S., & Ünlü, H. (2019). Determination of general structure of cattle enterprises in Giresun province. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 32(1), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.474790
  2. Anonymous (2023). Animal production statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Animal-Production-Statistics-2023-49681&dil=2 (Accessed date: 12.02.2025)
  3. Anonymous (2023a). Livestock statistics (number of animal), Record of Manyas District Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry.
  4. Anonymous (2024). Average size of households. Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=The-Results-of-Address-Based-Population-Registration-System-2024-53783&dil=2 (Accessed date: 25.02.2025).
  5. Aydın, M. K., & Keskin, M. (2019). Current status, some yield and structural characteristics of dairy cattle production in Muğla province. Journal of Lalahan Livestock Research Institute, 59(2), 57-63.
  6. Bakan, A., & Aydın, R. (2016). Socio-economic characteristics of dairy cattle enterprises in Ağrı province. Atatürk University Journal of the Agricultural Faculty, 47(2), 113-122.
  7. Bakır, G., & Kibar, M. (2020). Determination of some structural features of cattle fattening farms in Muş province. KSU Journal of Agriculture, 23(6), 1687-1697. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.694060
  8. Baykalır, Y., Akyüz, B., & Erişir, Z. (2020). Determination of structural features of dairy cattle farms in Kiraz district of İzmir province. ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 30(2), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.835031
  9. Birinci, A., & İkikat Tümer, E. (2006). A study on the attributes of farmers towards agricultural insurance: the case of Erzurum, Turkey. Die Bodenkultur Austrian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57(2), 41-47.
  10. Boyar, S., & Yumak, H. (2000). The level of feed and forage mechanisation and problems and solution suggestions in dairy cattle farms in Isparta and Burdur provinces. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(1), 11-18.
  11. Boz, İ. (2013). Structure and problems of dairy farms in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (Turkey). KSU Journal of Agriculture, 16(1), 24-32.
  12. Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Demir, P., & Ayvazoğlu, C. (2012). The expectation of livestock farms from veterinary services: example of Kars province. Kars ili örneği. Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, 9(3), 169-174.
  13. Everest, B., Yavaş, A.G., Tatar, E., Çakar, F., & Acar, İ. (2019). Factors affecting the desire of farmers for cooperative training: Çanakkale province example. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Science, 34(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.408742
  14. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step By Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 11.0 update. Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
  15. GMKA (2018). Balıkesir tarım ve hayvancılık yatırım rehberi. https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/Balikesir-Tarim-ve-Hayvancilik-Yatirim-Rehberi. pdf (Access date: 29.01.2025)
  16. Güven, O., & Yavuz, F. (2020). Stockbreeder profile and business structure in the cattle breeding sector: case of TRA2 Region. Academic Journal of Agriculture, 9(1), 81-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.29278/azd.603019
  17. Kılıç, O., & Aydın Eryılmaz, G. (2020). Structural characteristics of dairy cattle farms in Samsun province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 7(3): 637-645.
  18. Kılıçtek, S., & Aksoy, A. (2019). Evaluation with regards to adoption of innovations of dairy milk business managements in Erzurum province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Science, 6(3), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.595216
  19. Kızılaslan, H., & Birsin, S. (2020). Balıkesir ili İvrindi ilçesinde süt sermaye sığırcılığı yapılarının işletmelerinin incelenmesi. Gaziosmanpasa Journal of Scientific Research, 9(1): 73-81.
  20. Mat, B., & Cevger, Y. (2020). Structural characteristics and problems of dairy farms in Balıkesir province. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 36(4), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.15312/EurasianJVetSci.2020.309
  21. Önal, A.R., & Özder, M. (2008). Structural characteristic of the dairy farms that members of cattle breeders associations in Edirne. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 5(2), 197-203.
  22. Özbey, Ö., & Bayraktar, B. (2023). Economic Structure of Balıkesir. Balikesir University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 4(1), 21-42.
  23. Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. Nisan Kitabevi, Eskişehir, Türkiye. Özdemir, Y., Kınıklı, F., & Engindeniz, F. (2021). A research on the structural characteristics and problems of dairy cattle farms: the case of Gönen district of Balıkesır province. Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 8(4), 1001-1011. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.938077
  24. Özer, B., & İkikat Tümer, E. (2021). Structural features of dairy farming enterprises. Çukurova Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 36(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.36846/CJAFS.2021.47
  25. Öztürk, D., & Karkacıer, O. (2008). Economic analysis of dairy farms (the case of Yeşilyurt district of Tokat province). Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 25(1), 15-22.
  26. Paksoy, M., & Bulut, O. D. (2020). Investigation of socio-economic characteristics and cooperative-partner relationships of cooperative partners engaged in dairy cattle in Aksaray province. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science, 6(2), 252-262. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.684674
  27. Semerci, A. (2022). Determination of feed consumption and feed conversion ratio in dairy cattle farms: a case study of Hatay province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science And Technology, 10(7), 1214-1223. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i7.1214-1223.5093
  28. SPSS (2008). SPSS Statistics Base 17.0 for Windows User’s Guide. SPSS Inc, Chicago. Şahin, K. (2001). A research on structural features and marketing of dairy farms in Kayseri province, Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(1), 79-86.
  29. Şahin, K., & Karadağ Gürsoy, A. (2016). Socio economic structure of dairy cattle raising enterprises in Iğdır province, Nevşehir Journal of Science and Technology, Special issue, 118-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.210975
  30. Tapkı, N., Tapkı, İ., Dağıstan, E., Selvi, M.H., Kaya, A., Güzey, Y.Z., Demirtaş, B., & Çelik, A.D. (2018). Socio-economic characteristics of members of cattle breeders association in Hatay province. Journal of Animal Production, 59(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.410517
  31. Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye.
  32. Terin, M., Ceylan, M., Çiftçi, K., & Yıldırım, İ. (2024). Comparison of socio demographic and management characteristics of dairy cattle enterprises in Van province. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 27(1), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1303086
  33. Terin, M., Ceylan, M., Çiftçi, K., & Yıldırım, İ., (2024a). Analysis of factors affecting dairy farms' animal life insurance: a case study Van province. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 27(2), 460-468. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1294040
  34. Torgut, E., Annayev S., Örmeci Kart, M. Ç., & Türkekul, B. (2019). Determination of general characteristics of dairy cattle: the case of İzmir province Ödemiş and Tire districts. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics, 25(1), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.557711
  35. Tugay, A., & Bakır, G. (2009). The structural features of dairy cattle farms in Giresun province. Atatürk University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 40(1), 37-47.
  36. Uzgören, N. (2012). Bilimsel Araştırmalarda Kullanılan Temel İstatistiksel Yöntemler ve SPSS Uygulamaları. Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa, Türkiye.
  37. Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary Sampling Theory. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice