SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 4

Optimizing Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Pepper Under Deficit Irrigation Using Biochar

İhsan Serkan Varol(Erciyes Üniversitesi)0000-0001-8474-4514
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Present findings indicated that, in water-scarce regions, combining 75% irrigation with a high biochar dose was an effective strategy to maximize yield per unit water.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Present research was conducted to investigate the interactions between deficit irrigation and biochar application in pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiment was arranged in a 4×4 factorial design with three replications, comprising all combinations of four irrigation levels (100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of field capacity) and four biochar doses (0, 50, 150 and 250 g/5 kg).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Present findings indicated that, in water-scarce regions, combining 75% irrigation with a high biochar dose was an effective strategy to maximize yield per unit water.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biochar · deficit irrigation · water use efficiency

Abstract

Present research was conducted to investigate the interactions between deficit irrigation and biochar application in pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. Demre Sivrisi) grown under greenhouse conditions in a sandy-loam soil with low water-holding capacity. The experiment was arranged in a 4×4 factorial design with three replications, comprising all combinations of four irrigation levels (100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of field capacity) and four biochar doses (0, 50, 150 and 250 g/5 kg). The amount of irrigation water was determined using a gravimetric method. Plant height, fresh biomass, yield and crop water consumption (ET) were measured, and water use efficiency (WUE), biomass water use efficiency (BWUE), harvest index (HI) and yield response factor (Ky) were calculated. Water deficit markedly reduced all growth and yield parameters; mean yield decreased from 1058 g per pot under full irrigation to 108 g per pot under the most severe deficit. Biochar application increased growth and yield at all irrigation levels, providing about a 35% yield increase at the highest dose relative to the control. Biochar raised the field capacity of the sandy-loam soil by 30% at the highest dose. WUE reached its maximum not under full irrigation but at the 75% irrigation level (15.9 g/L), with the highest WUE (17.0 g/L) obtained at the 75% irrigation–250 g biochar combination. Increasing biochar dose lowered the yield response factor (Ky), reducing the crop's sensitivity to water deficit. Present findings indicated that, in water-scarce regions, combining 75% irrigation with a high biochar dose was an effective strategy to maximize yield per unit water.

🔖

Cite This Article

Varol, İ. S. (2026). Optimizing Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Pepper Under Deficit Irrigation Using Biochar. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1990486

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Abdelghany, A. E., Dou, Z., Alashram, M. G., Eltohamy, K. M., Elrys, A. S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Cheng, M., Fan, J., & Zhang, F. (2023). The joint application of biochar and nitrogen enhances fruit yield, quality and water-nitrogen productivity of water-stressed greenhouse tomato under drip fertigation. Agricultural Water Management, 290, 108605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108605
  2. Abel, S., Peters, A., Trinks, S., Schonsky, H., Facklam, M., & Wessolek, G. (2013). Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma, 202–203, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.03.003
  3. Al-Wabel, M. I., Hussain, Q., Usman, A. R. A., Ahmad, M., Abduljabbar, A., Sallam, A. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2017). Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: A review. Land Degradation & Development, 29(7), 2124–2161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2829
  4. Anifowoshe, Y. O., Lozada, D., Sanogo, S., & Djaman, K. (2025). Water Management in Chile Peppers and Plant Susceptibility to Phytophthora capsici and Development of Phytophthora Blight: A Review. Agronomy, 15(12), 2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122819
  5. Basso, A. S., Miguez, F. E., Laird, D. A., Horton, R., & Westgate, M. (2013). Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils. GCB Bioenergy, 5(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12026
  6. Bijalwan, P., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, P. (2022). Review of the effects of drought stress on plants: A systematic approach. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202202.0014.v1
  7. Cakmakci, T., & Sahın, U. (2023). Yield, physiological responses and irrigation water productivity of capia pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) at deficit irrigation and different biochar levels. Gesunde Pflanzen, 75(2), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00703-5
  8. Ciftci, B., Varol, I. S., Akcura, S., Kardes, Y. M., Karaman, S., & Kaplan, M. (2025). Morphological and nutritional responses of sorghum to variable irrigation levels and nitrogen doses. Plos one, 20(5), e0323901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323901
  9. Donald, C. M., & Hamblin, J. (1976). The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Advances in Agronomy, 28, 361–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60559-3
  10. Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. H. (1979). Yield response to water (FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  11. FAOSTAT. (2025). FAOSTAT statistical database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat
  12. Fereres, E., & Soriano, M. A. (2007). Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl165
  13. Gebhardt, M., Fehmi, J. S., Rasmussen, C., & Gallery, R. E. (2017). Soil amendments alter plant biomass and soil microbial activity in a semi-desert grassland. Plant and Soil, 419(1–2), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3327-5
  14. Gokalp, Z., & Humaidy, J. H. (2023). Impacts of climate change of paddy farming in four Iraqi rural communities: The case of Al Najaf, Al Qadisiyah, Al Muthanna and Thi Qar. Gesunde Pflanzen, 75(4), 971–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00760-w
  15. He, L., & Rosa, L. (2023). Solutions to agricultural green water scarcity under climate change. PNAS Nexus, 2(4), pgad117. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad117
  16. Hossain, M. Z., Bahar, M. M., Sarkar, B., Donne, S. W., Ok, Y. S., Palansooriya, K. N., Kirkham, M. B., Chowdhury, S., & Bolan, N. (2020). Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. Biochar, 2(4), 379–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z
  17. Howell, T. A. (2001). Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy Journal, 93(2), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.932281x
  18. Iqbal, B., Hussain, F., Khan, M. S., Iqbal, T., Shah, W., Ali, B.,. & Ercisli, S. (2023). Physiology of gamma-aminobutyric acid treated Capsicum annuum L. (Sweet pepper) under induced drought stress. Plos one, 18(8), e0289900.
  19. Kaplan, M., Kara, K., Unlukara, A., Kale, H., Buyukkilic Beyzi, S., Varol, I.S., Kizilsimsek, M., & Kamalak, A. (2019). Water deficit and nitrogen affects yield and feed value of sorghum sudangrass silage. Agricultural Water Management, 218, 30–36.
  20. Li, L., Zhang, Y.-J., Novak, A., Yang, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Role of Biochar in Improving Sandy Soil Water Retention and Resilience to Drought. Water, 13(4), 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040407
  21. Liu, M., Liu, X., Song, Y., Hu, Y., Yang, C., Li, J., Jin, S., Gu, K., Yang, Z., Huang, W., Su, J., & Wang, L. (2024). Tobacco production under global climate change: combined effects of heat and drought stress and coping strategies. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1489993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1489993
  22. Macias-Bobadilla, I., Vargas-Hernandez, M., Guevara-Gonzalez, R. G., Rico-Garcia, E., Ocampo-Velazquez, R. V., & Torres-Pacheco, I. (2020). Differential Response to Water Deficit in Chili Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Growing in Two Types of Soil Under Different Irrigation Regimes. Agriculture, 10(9), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090381
  23. Mishra, N., Santhosh, B., Malode, K. R., Waghmare, M. S., Yadav, A., Kumari, N., Yadav, A. K., & Pal, S. (2025). A Short Note on the Role of Biochar in Carbon Sequestration and Soil Physical, Chemical and Biological Properties. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, 28(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i21975
  24. Mulcahy, D. N., Mulcahy, D. L., & Dietz, D. (2013). Biochar soil amendment increases tomato seedling resistance to drought in sandy soils. Journal of Arid Environments, 88, 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.07.012
  25. Ntanasi, T., Karavidas, I., Savvas, D., Spyrou, G. P., Giannothanasis, E., Consentino, B. B., Papasotiropoulos, V., Sabatino, L., & Ntatsi, G. (2025). Physiological and Yield Responses of Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Genotypes to Drought Stress. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 14(13), 1934. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14131934
  26. Rahman, S. U., Han, J.-C., Yasin, G., Imtiaz, M. T., Zhao, X., Alharbi, S. A., Alfarraj, S., & Alarfaj, A. A. (2025). Synergetic effects of potassium and biochar on morphological, physiological, and biochemical attributes of maize crop grown under different levels of drought stress. BMC Plant Biology, 25(1), 402. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06391-3
  27. Razi, K., & Muneer, S. (2021). Drought stress-induced physiological mechanisms, signaling pathways and molecular response of chloroplasts in common vegetable crops. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 41(5), 669–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1874280
  28. Ruan, R., Lambers, H., & Wang, Y. (2024). Comparative responses of two maize genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance to biochar application. Biochar, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00359-6
  29. Shahzad, M. A., Jan, S. U., Afzal, F., Khalid, M., Gul, A., Sharma, I., Sofo, A., & Ahmad, P. (2016). Drought stress and morphophysiological responses in plants. 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119054450.ch27
  30. Stagnari, F., Galieni, A., & Pisante, M. (2016). Drought stress effects on crop quality. 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119054450.ch23
  31. Tenic, E., Ghogare, R., & Dhingra, A. (2020). Biochar—A Panacea for Agriculture or Just Carbon? Horticulturae, 6(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6030037
  32. Varol, I. S., Kardes, Y. M., Irik, H. A., Kirnak, H., & Kaplan, M. (2020). Supplementary irrigations at different physiological growth stages of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) change grain nutritional composition. Food chemistry, 303, 125402.
  33. Varol, I. S., Ünlükara, A., & Kaplan, M. (2024). Water productivity, yield response factors, yield and quality of alfalfa cultivars in semi-arid climate conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 224, 105826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105826
  34. Wu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, L., Zheng, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The critical role of biochar to mitigate the adverse impacts of drought and salinity stress in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1163451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1163451
  35. Iqbal, B., Hussain, F., Khan, M. S., Iqbal, T., Shah, W., Ali, B.,. & Ercisli, S. (2023). Physiology of gamma-aminobutyric acid treated Capsicum annuum L. (Sweet pepper) under induced drought stress. Plos one, 18(8), e0289900.