SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 29 Issue: 2

Evaluation of Image Processing Technique on Quality Properties of Chickpea Seeds (Cicer arietinum L.) Using Machine Learning Algorithms

İhsan Serkan Varol(Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey)0000-0001-8474-4514
Necati Çetin(Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)0000-0001-8524-8272
Halil Kırnak(Department of Construction Technology, Vocational School of Adana, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey)0000-0002-6922-5457
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that multilayer perceptron (MLP) had the greatest correlation coefficients for mass (0.9997), chroma (0.9998) hue angle (0.9998) and color index (0.9992).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chickpea is an important edible legume consumed worldwide because of rich nutrient composition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, effects of seven different irrigation treatments (I1-rainfed, I2-pre-flowering single irrigation, I3-beginning of flowering single irrigation, I4-50% pod set single irrigation, I5-irrigation at 50% flowering and 50% pod fill, I6-irrigation before flowering and at 50% pod set, I7-full irrigation) on size, shape, mass, and color properties of chickpea seeds were investigated, and machine learning algorithms were used to estimate mass and color attributes of chickpea seeds.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that multilayer perceptron (MLP) had the greatest correlation coefficients for mass (0.9997), chroma (0.9998) hue angle (0.9998) and color index (0.9992).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chickpea · Mass · Color

Abstract

Chickpea is an important edible legume consumed worldwide because of rich nutrient composition. The physical parameters of chickpea are crucial attributes for design of processing and classification systems. In this study, effects of seven different irrigation treatments (I1-rainfed, I2-pre-flowering single irrigation, I3-beginning of flowering single irrigation, I4-50% pod set single irrigation, I5-irrigation at 50% flowering and 50% pod fill, I6-irrigation before flowering and at 50% pod set, I7-full irrigation) on size, shape, mass, and color properties of chickpea seeds were investigated, and machine learning algorithms were used to estimate mass and color attributes of chickpea seeds. In terms of physical attributes, the best results were obtained in I1 and I5 irrigation treatments. According to the findings, among the irrigation treatments, I5 had the greatest mass, volume, geometric mean diameter, projected area with the values of 0.50 g, 394.86 cm3, 9.10 mm and 65.03 mm2, respectively. In addition, I1 had the highest shape index and elongation as 1.33 and 1.34, respectively. The results showed that multilayer perceptron (MLP) had the greatest correlation coefficients for mass (0.9997), chroma (0.9998) hue angle (0.9998) and color index (0.9992). The MLP yielded better outcomes than random forest for both mass and color estimation. Additionally, single or couple irrigation treatment at different physiological stages instead of full irrigation treatment might be sufficient to improve the physical attributes of chickpea.

🔖

Cite This Article

Varol, İ. S., Çetin, N., Kırnak, H. (2023). Evaluation of Image Processing Technique on Quality Properties of Chickpea Seeds (Cicer arietinum L.) Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 29 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1019586

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (69)

  1. Agbola F W, Kelley T G, Bent M J & Rao P P (2002). Eliciting and valuing market preferences with traditional food crops: The case of chickpea in India. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 5(1): 7-21. doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(02)00110-6
  2. Akpınar Y (2016). Evaluation of soil moisture sensors for soil water content measurement in the Central Anatolian Region. Erciyes University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Master Thesis, Kayseri, Turkey.
  3. Ashokkumar K, Diapari M, Jha A B, Tar’an B, Arganosa G & Warkentin T D (2015). Genetic diversity of nutritionally important carotenoids in 94 pea and 121 chickpea accessions. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 43: 49-60. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.04.014
  4. Ataş M, Yardimci Y & Temizel A (2012) A new approach to aflatoxin detection in chili pepper by machine vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 87: 129-141. doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.06.001
  5. Benjamin J G & Nielsen D C (2006). Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crops Research 97(2-3): 248-253. doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.10.005
  6. Berhane T M, Lane C R, Wu Q, Autrey B C, Anenkhonov O A, Chepinoga V V & Liu H (2018). Decision-tree, rule-based, and random forest classification of high-resolution multispectral imagery for wetland mapping and inventory. Remote Sensing (Basel) 10(4): 580. doi.org/10.3390/rs10040580
  7. Beyaz A, Ozturk R & Turker U (2010). Assessment of mechanical damage on apples with image analysis. Journal: Food, Agriculture and Environment 8(3-4): 476-480.
  8. Beyaz A & Ozturk R (2016). Identification of olive cultivars using image processing techniques. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 40(5): 671-683. doi.org/10.3906/tar-1504-95
  9. Beyaz A & Gerdan D (2021). Meta-learning-based prediction of different corn cultivars from color feature extraction. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 27(1): 32-41. doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.567407
  10. Breiman L (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning 45: 5-32. doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  11. Cetin N, Yaman M, Karaman K & Demir B (2020). Determination of some physicomechanical and biochemical parameters of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 44(5): 439-450. doi.org/10.3906/tar-1905-115
  12. Cetin N, Karaman K, Beyzi E, Saglam C & Demirel B (2021). Comparative evaluation of some quality characteristics of sunflower oilseeds (Helianthus annuus L.) through machine learning classifiers. Food Analytical Methods 14: 1666-1681. doi.org/10.1007/s12161-021-02002-7
  13. Cinar I & Koklu M (2022). Identification of rice varieties using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 28(2): 307-325. doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.862482
  14. Çetin N (2022). Machine learning for varietal binary classification of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) seeds based on shape and size attributes. Food Analytical Methods 15(8): 2260-2273. doi.org/10.1007/s12161-022-02286-3
  15. Colton T (1974). Statistics in Medicine, Little Brown and Co New York, U.S.A, pp. 179.
  16. Costa C, Antonucci F, Pallottino F, Aguzzi J, Sun D W & Menesatti P (2011). Shape analysis of agricultural products: a review of recent research advances and potential application to computer vision. Food and Bioprocess Techology 4(5):673-692. doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0556-0
  17. de Camargo A C, Favero B T, Morzelle M C, Franchin M, Alvarez-Parrilla E, de la Rosa L A, Geraldi M V, Maróstica Júnior M R, Shahidi F & Schwember A R (2019). Is chickpea a potential substitute for soybean? Phenolic bioactives and potential health benefits. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20(11): 2644 doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112644
  18. Demir B (2018). Application of data mining and adaptive neuro-fuzzy structure to predict color parameters of walnuts (Juglans regia L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 42(3): 216-225. doi.org/10.3906/tar-1801-78
  19. Demir B, Sayıncı B, Çetin N, Yaman M, Çömlek R, Aydın Y & Sütyemez M (2018). Elliptic Fourier based analysis and multivariate approaches for size and shape distinctions of walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars. Grasas y Aceites 69(4): 1-12 doi.org/10.3989/gya.0104181
  20. Demir B, Sayinci B, Çetin N, Yaman M & Çömlek R (2019). Shape discrimination of almond cultivars by elliptic fourier descriptors. Erwerbs-Obstbau 61(3): 245-256. doi.org/10.1007/s10341-019-00423-7
  21. Demir B, Eski İ, Gürbüz F, Kuş Z A, Sesli Y & Ercişli S (2020). Prediction of walnut mass based on physical attributes by Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Erwerbs-Obstbau 62(1): 47-56. doi.org/10.1007/s10341-019-00468-8
  22. Eissa A H A, Mohamed M A, Moustafa H & Alghannam A R O (2010). Moisture dependent physical and mechanical properties of chickpea seeds. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 3(4): 80-93.
  23. Ercisli S, Sayinci B, Kara M, Yildiz C & Ozturk I (2012). Determination of size and shape features of walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars using image processing. Scientia Horticulturae 133: 47-55. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.10.014
  24. FAOSTAT (2019) Source: http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed on 14 May, 2021).
  25. Fıratlıgil-Durmus E, Sárka E, Bubník Z, Schejbal M & Kadlec P (2010). Size properties of legume seeds of different varieties using image analysis. Journal of Food Engineering 99(4): 445-451. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.005
  26. Gaur P M, Samineni S, Sajja S & Chibbar R N (2015). Achievements and challenges in improving nutritional quality of chickpea. Legume Perspectives 09: 31-33.
  27. Germšek B, Rozman Č & Unuk T (2017). Forecasting apple fruit color intensity with machine learning methods. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59(2): 109-118. doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0305-7
  28. George C, McGruder R & Torgerson K (2007). Determination of optimal surface area to volume ratio for thin-layer drying of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis). International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering 2(2): 76-88. doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v2i2.2093
  29. Gurbuz F, Demi̇r B, Eski İ, Kuş Z A, Yılmaz K U, Ilikçioğlu E & Ercişli S (2018). Estimation of the weights of almond nuts based on physical properties through data mining. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 46(2): 579-584. doi.org/10.15835/nbha46210631
  30. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P & Witten I H (2009). The WEKA data mining Software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations. Available online: http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz. (Accessed 10 May 2020)
  31. Hammer Ø, Harper D A T & Ryan P D (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9.
  32. Hawkes C (2006). Uneven dietary development: linking the policies and processes of globalization with the nutrition transition, obesity and diet-related chronic diseases. Global Health 2(1): 1-18. doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-2-4
  33. Huang M, Wang Q, Zhang M & Zhu Q (2014). Prediction of color and moisture content for vegetable soybean during drying using hyperspectral imaging technology. Journal of Food Engineering 128: 24-30. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.12.008
  34. IBM SPSS (2010). Statistical software. SSS Inc., IBM Company©, Version 20.0.
  35. Iqbal A, Ateeq N, Khalil I A, Perveen S & Saleemullah S (2006). Physicochemical characteristics and amino acid profile of chickpea cultivars grown in Pakistan. Journal of Foodservice 17(2): 94-101. doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4506.2006.00024.x
  36. Jimenez-Cuesta M, Cuquerella J & Martinez-Javega J M (1982). Determination of a color index for fruit degreening. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, November, 9-12, Tokyo, Japan.
  37. Jogihalli P, Singh L, Kumar K & Sharanagat V S (2017). Physico-functional and antioxidant properties of sand-roasted chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Food Chemistry 237: 1124-1132. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.069
  38. Kaplan M, Karaman K, Kardes Y M & Kale H (2019). Phytic acid content and starch properties of maize (Zea mays L.): Effects of irrigation process and nitrogen fertilizer. Food Chemistry 283: 375-380. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.029
  39. Kara M, Sayıncı B, Elkoca E, Öztürk İ & Özmen T B (2013). Seed size and shape analysis of registered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in Turkey using digital photography. Journal of Agricultural Science 19(3): 219-234. doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001247
  40. Karray F O & Silva C D (2004). Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems Design: Theory, Tools and Applications. Addison Wesley Pearson Press, New York, USA doi.org/10.1002/rnc.1072
  41. Kibar H, Öztürk T & Temizel K E (2014). Effective engineering properties in the design of storage structures of postharvest dry bean grain. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 36(2): 147-158. doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v36i2.19394
  42. Kirnak H, Varol I S, Irik H A & Ozaktan H (2017). Effects of irrigation applied at different growth stages on chickpea yield. Agronomy Research 15(5): 1928-1933. doi.org/10.15159/ar.17.046
  43. Kupe M, Sayıncı B, Demir B, Ercisli S, Baron M & Sochor J (2021). Morphological characteristics of grapevine cultivars and closed contour analysis with elliptic fourier descriptors. Plants (Basel) 10(7): 1350. doi.org/10.3390/plants10071350
  44. Kus Z A, Demir B, Eski I, Gurbuz F & Ercisli S (2017). Estimation of the colour properties of apples varieties using neural network. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59(4): 291-299. doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0324-z
  45. Marini F, Magri A L, Balestrieri F, Fabretti F & Marini D (2004). Supervised pattern recognition applied to the discrimination of the floral origin of six types of Italian honey samples. Analytica Chimica Acta 515(1): 117-125. doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.01.013
  46. Martínez S S, Gila D M, Beyaz A, Ortega J G & García J G (2018). A computer vision approach based on endocarp features for the identification of olive cultivars. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 154: 341-346. doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.017
  47. Masoumi A A & Tabil L (2003). Physical properties of chickpea (C. arientinum) cultivers. Paper No. 036058 for 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting, Las Vagas, NV, USA, 27–30 July 2003. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA doi.org/10.13031/2013.14130
  48. McGuire R G (1992). Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27(12): 1254-1255. doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.27.12.1254
  49. Mehta G, Verma P K & Ravi M (2015). Correlation studies in chickpea grown under rainfed and irrigated conditions in Northern Plains of India. Journal of Agroecology and Natural Resource Management 2(5): 388-390.
  50. Mollazade K, Omid M & Arefi A (2012). Comparing Data Mining Classifiers for Grading Raisins based on Visual Features. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 84: 124-131. doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.03.004
  51. Mohsenin N N (1986). Physical properties of plant and animal materials: Structure, physical characteristics and mechanical properties. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
  52. Nikoobin M, Mirdavardoost F, Kashaninejad M, Soltani A (2009). Moisture-dependent physical properties of chickpea seeds. Journal of Food Process Engineering 32(4): 544-564. doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00231.x
  53. Omid M, Khojastehnazhand M & Tabatabaeefar A (2010). Estimating volume and mass of citrus fruits by image processing technique. Journal of food Engineering 100(2): 315-321. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.04.015
  54. Onder M, Kahraman A & Ceyhan E (2014). Response of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to water shortage. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Natural Sciences Special Issue: 623-628.
  55. Queiroz V A V, da Silva C S, de Menezes C B, Schaffert R E, Guimarães F F M & Guimarães L J M, Guimarães P E O, Tardin F D (2015). Nutritional composition of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] genotypes cultivated without and with water stress. Journal of Cereal Science 65: 103-111. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2015.06.018
  56. Ozkan G & Koyuncu M A (2005). Physical and chemical composition of some walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes grown in Turkey. Grasas y Aceites 56(2): 141-146. doi.org/10.3989/gya.2005.v56.i2.122
  57. Rad M R N, Ghalandarzehi A & Koohpaygani J A (2017). Predicting eggplant individual fruit weight using an artificial neural network. International Journal of Vegetable Science 23(4): 331-339. doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2017.1290001
  58. Rodriguez-Galiano V F, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M & Rigol-Sanchez J P (2012). An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 67: 93-104. doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002
  59. Ronnenberg K & Wesche K (2011). Effects of fertilization and irrigation on productivity, plant nutrient contents and soil nutrients in southern Mongolia. Plant and Soil 340: 239-251. doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0409-z
  60. Saglam C & Cetin N (2021). Prediction of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) mass based on shape and size attributes by using machine learning algorithms. Food Analytical Methods 15: 739-750. doi.org/10.1007/s12161-021-02154-6
  61. Sastry D V S S R, Upadhyaya H D & Srinivas T R (2019). Variation for seed physical and hydration properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mini core collection and their relevance to conservation and utilization. Plant Genetic Resources 17(4): 311-324. doi.org/10.1017/S1479262119000030
  62. Sayinci B, Ercisli S, Ozturk I, Eryilmaz Z & Demir B (2012). Determination of size and shape in the ‘Moro’ blood orange and ‘Valencia’ sweet orange cultivar and its mutants using image processing. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 40(1): 234-242. doi.org/10.15835/nbha4016645
  63. Sayıncı B, Ercişli S, Akbulut M, Şavşatlı Y & Baykal H (2015a). Determination of shape in fruits of cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus) accessions by using Elliptic Fourier analysis. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 14(1): 63-82.
  64. Sayıncı B, Kara M, Ercişli S, Duyar Ö & Ertürk Y (2015b). Elliptic Fourier analysis for shape distinction of Turkish hazelnut cultivars. Erwerbs-Obstbau 57(1): 1-11. doi.org/10.1007/s10341-014-0221-7
  65. Soares J D R, Pasqual M, Lacerda W S, Silva S O & Donato S L R (2013). Utilization of artificial neural networks in the prediction of the bunches’ weight in banana plants. Scientia Horticulturae 155: 24-29. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.01.026
  66. Stegmayer G, Milone D H, Garran S & Burdyn L (2013) Automatic recognition of quarantine citrus diseases. Expert Systems with Applications 40(9): 3512-3517. doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.059
  67. van Roy J, Keresztes J C, Wouters N, De Ketelaere B & Saeys W (2017). Measuring colour of vine tomatoes using hyperspectral imaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology 129: 79-89. doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.03.006
  68. Varol I S, Kardes Y M, Irik H A, Kirnak H & Kaplan M (2020). Supplementary irrigations at different physiological growth stages of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) change grain nutritional composition. Food Chemistry 303: 125402. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125402
  69. Yildirim A & Oner M D (2015). Electrical conductivity, water absorption, leaching, and color change of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) during soaking with ultrasound treatment. International Journal of Food Properties 18(6): 1359-1372. doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2014.917660