SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3

Academicianship in Pharmacy: A Qualitative Study

Eczacılıkta Akademisyenlik: Nitel Bir Çalışma

Elif Ulutaş Deniz(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7257-9224
Rumeysa Eren(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0686-9172
Pages
413–419
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, providing comprehensive information about academic pathways during their undergraduate studies is recommended.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An academic pharmacist signifies individuals who engage in research activities within the pharmacy field at higher education institutions like universities, impart education, and contribute to the discipline through original investigations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consisted of 10 academic pharmacists who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, providing comprehensive information about academic pathways during their undergraduate studies is recommended.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akademi · Veri analizi · Eczacılar

Abstract

An academic pharmacist signifies individuals who engage in research activities within the pharmacy field at higher education institutions like universities, impart education, and contribute to the discipline through original investigations. This study aims to explore the advantages and challenges encountered by academic pharmacists, along with providing insights and recommendations for aspiring academic pharmacists. The cross-sectional study employed a qualitative approach involving face-to-face interactions through semi-structured and in-depth interviews utilizing both ‘open-ended’ and ‘semi-structured’ questions. The study population consisted of academic pharmacists working in Turkey. The sample of the study consisted of 10 academic pharmacists who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. Thematic analysis of the data was carried out through a comprehensive exploration of these interviews. As a result of conducting thematic content analysis on the interview data, a total of four principal themes have emerged: drawbacks, requisite competencies, motivating factors and suggestions. Considering the current proliferation of pharmacy faculties and student enrollments, it is advisable to encourage pharmacy students to contemplate academic pharmacy as a component of their career planning. Furthermore, providing comprehensive information about academic pathways during their undergraduate studies is recommended.

Özet

Akademisyen eczacı, üniversiteler gibi yükseköğretim kurumlarında eczacılık alanında araştırma faaliyetlerinde bulunan, eğitim veren ve özgün araştırmalarla disipline katkıda bulunan bireyleri ifade etmektedir. Bu çalışma, akademik eczacıların karşılaştığı avantaj ve zorlukları keşfetmenin yanı sıra, gelecek vadeden akademik eczacılar için içgörü ve öneriler sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu kesitsel çalışmada, hem ‘açık uçlu’ hem de ‘yarı yapılandırılmış’ soruların kullanıldığı yarı yapılandırılmış ve derinlemesine görüşmeler yoluyla yüz yüze etkileşimleri içeren nitel bir yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. Çalışma evrenini Türkiye’de çalışan akademik eczacılar oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın örneklemini ise çalışmaya katılmayı gönüllü olarak kabul eden 10 akademik eczacı oluşturmuştur. Verilerin tematik analizi, bu görüşmelerin kapsamlı bir şekilde incelenmesi yoluyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşme verileri üzerinde yapılan tematik içerik analizi sonucunda toplam dört ana tema ortaya çıkmıştır: dezavantajlar, gerekli yetkinlikler, motivasyon ve öneriler. Eczacılık fakültelerinin ve öğrenci kayıtlarının mevcut çoğalması göz önüne alındığında, eczacılık öğrencilerini kariyer planlamalarının bir parçası olarak akademik eczacılığı düşünmeye yönlendirmek ve lisans eğitimleri sırasında akademik yollar hakkında kapsamlı bilgi verilmesi tavsiye edilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

Deniz, E. U., Eren, R. (2024). Academicianship in Pharmacy: A Qualitative Study. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 413–419. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1409433

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Ahmad, A., Khan, M. U., Srikanth, A. B., Patel, I., Nagappa, A. N., & Jamshed, S. Q. (2015). Evaluation of workload and its impact on satisfaction among pharmacy academicians in Southern India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 9(6), FC01.
  2. All Pharmacy Employers’ Association. (2014). Increasing the number of pharmacy faculties creates employment problems. from https:// www.teis.org.tr/post/tei%CC%87s-eczac%C4%B1l%C4%B1kfak% C3%BCltelerinin-say%C4%B1s%C4%B1n%C4%B1na r t t % C 4 % B 1 r % C 4 % B 1 l m a s % C 4 % B 1 - i s t i h d a m - s o r u n u - yarat%C4%B1yor
  3. Alozie, M., & Effiong, D. (2021). Attaining Excellence in Professional Pharmacy Practice-Pharmacists in Academia Must Take the Lead. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 27(1), 60-67.
  4. Armour, C., Brillant, M., & Krass, I. (2007). Pharmacists’ views on involvement in pharmacy practice research: strategies for facilitating participation. Pharmacy Practice (Internet), 5(2), 59- 66. Arslan, M., Çoban, E. S., & Şar, S. (2020). Kadın Eczacılar Perspektifinden Eczacılık Mesleği. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 44(2), 220-232.
  5. Aziri, B. (2011). Job satisfaction: A literature review. Management Research & Practice, 3(4).
  6. Barnett, M. J., Lindfelt, T., Doroudgar, S., Chan, E., & Ip, E. J. (2022). Pharmacy-faculty work-life balance and career satisfaction: Comparison of national survey results from 2012 and 2018. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 5, 100112.
  7. Biçer, S. (2019). Bir Eczacının Kariyer Yolculuğu.
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Thematic analysis revised—Final. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  9. Burton, S., Boschmans, S.-A., & Hoelson, C. (2013). Self-perceived professional identity of pharmacy educators in South Africa. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(10).
  10. Conklin, M. H., & Desselle, S. P. (2007). Development of a multidimensional scale to measure work satisfaction among pharmacy faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(4).
  11. Desselle, S. P., Darbishire, P. L., & Clubbs, B. H. (2020). Pharmacy faculty burnout: cause for concern that requires our support and use of best evidence. INNOVATIONS in pharmacy, 11(3).
  12. Draugalis, J. R., DiPiro, J. T., Zeolla, M. M., & Schwinghammer, T. L. (2006). A career in academic pharmacy: opportunities, challenges, and rewards. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(1).
  13. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500.
  14. Halim, Y. A. (2009). Development and validation of an instrument to access the lecturers’ performance in the education and teaching duties. Journal Pendidikan Malaysia, 34(2), 33-47.
  15. Harding, G. (2006). Why pharmacists are needed to help shape students’ professional identity. Pharmaceutical Journal, 277(7432), 766-766.
  16. Jamshed, S., Ibrahim, M., Hassali, M., & Khalid, S. (2010). Perception of academic pharmacists regarding their career growth: a qualitative case study from Pakistan. J Clin Diagn Res, 4(5), 3075-3082. Kennedy, D. R., Clapp, P., DeLuca, J. L., Filtz, T. M., Kroon, L., Lamberts,
  17. J. T., et al. (2022). Enhancing pharmacy faculty well-being and productivity while reducing burnout. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(5), 8764.
  18. Kılıçdağı, Y., & Özçelikay, G. (2018). Türkiye’de Eczacılık Alanında Lisansüstü Eğitiminin Bugünü ve Geleceği. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 8(2), 200-206.
  19. Kırpık, G., & Ilcektay, A. (2020). Eczacılık Mesleğinde Kariyer Yollarının Belirlenmesi: Literatür Taraması ve Yarı-Yapılandırılmış Mülakat Yöntemi ile Yapılan Bir Çalışma. European Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), 4(6), 67-90.
  20. Kırpık, G., & Yılmaz, E. (2018, 29-30 November 2018). Eczacılık İşletmeciligi Kapsamında Eczacılık Mesleğine İlişkin Kariyer Açısından Sorun Belirleme ve Öneri Geliştirme: Dar Kapsamlı Bir Çalışma. Paper presented at the 4 International EMI Entrepreneurship & Social Sciences Congress,, İstanbul.
  21. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4(1), 255-311.
  22. Lindholm, J. A., Astin, A. W., Sax, L. J., & Korn, W. S. (2002). The American College Teacher: National Norms for the 2001-2002 HERI Faculty Survey: ERIC.
  23. Mylrea, M. F., Sen Gupta, T., & Glass, B. D. (2017). Developing professional identity in undergraduate pharmacy students: a role for self-determination theory. Pharmacy, 5(2), 16.
  24. Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45, 285-309.
  25. Turkish Pharmacists Association. (2019). Press Release-Danger Bells are Ringing for the Pharmacy Profession!, from https://www.teb. org.tr/news/8401/50-OLDU-ECZACILIK-MESLE%C4%9E%C4%B0- %C4%B0%C3%87%C4%B0N-TEHL%C4%B0KE-%C3%87ANLARI- %C3%87ALIYOR
  26. Urbina‐Garcia, A. (2020). What do we know about university academics’ mental health? A systematic literature review. Stress and Health, 36(5), 563-585.
  27. Uzun, M. B., Özçelikay, G., & Gülpınar, G. (2017). The situation of curriculums of faculty of pharmacies in Turkey. Marmara Pharmaceutical Journal, 21(1), 183-189.
  28. Kırpık, G., & Yılmaz, E. (2018, 29-30 November 2018). Eczacılık İşletmeciligi Kapsamında Eczacılık Mesleğine İlişkin Kariyer Açısından Sorun Belirleme ve Öneri Geliştirme: Dar Kapsamlı Bir Çalışma. Paper presented at the 4 International EMI Entrepreneurship & Social Sciences Congress,, İstanbul.