Journals / Bilig / 2020 /

Assessment of The Relation of Nationalist Movement and Religion in Tunisia in the Pre-Independence Period from An Ethnosymbolic Approach (1911-1956)

Bağımsızlık Öncesi Dönemde Tunus’ta Milliyetçi Hareket ve Din İlişkisinin Etnosembolcü Bir Yaklaşımla Değerlendirilmesi (1911-1956)

Journal
Bilig
Pages
185–204
Publication Date
2020-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Emphasizing that nationalist elites in Tunisia instrumentalize religious symbols to reach their goals, it is claimed that the ethno-symbolic approach offers a more comprehensive view than any other approach in the field of nationalism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between religion and nationalism through the independence movement in Tunisia during the French Protectorate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This work, which adopts an ethno-symbolic approach unlike primordia list and constructivist approaches that have emerged in these studies of nationalism, reveals that the leaders who lead the nationalist movement in Tunisia aim to establish a nation-state by using religious symbols.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Emphasizing that nationalist elites in Tunisia instrumentalize religious symbols to reach their goals, it is claimed that the ethno-symbolic approach offers a more comprehensive view than any other approach in the field of nationalism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Milliyetçilik · ulusal kimlik · etno-sembolcü yaklaşım

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between religion and nationalism through the independence movement in Tunisia during the French Protectorate. This work, which adopts an ethno-symbolic approach unlike primordia list and constructivist approaches that have emerged in these studies of nationalism, reveals that the leaders who lead the nationalist movement in Tunisia aim to establish a nation-state by using religious symbols. In this context, the study argues that the attitude of the nationalist movement on religion can be better understood in the light of the ideological and political struggles that are effective in the pre-independence period. Emphasizing that nationalist elites in Tunisia instrumentalize religious symbols to reach their goals, it is claimed that the ethno-symbolic approach offers a more comprehensive view than any other approach in the field of nationalism.

Özet

Bu çalışma, din ve milliyetçilik arasındaki ilişkiyi Fransız protektora yönetimi döneminde Tunus’ta gelişen bağımsızlık hareketi üzerinden ele almaktadır. Milliyetçilik alanında yapılan çalışmalarda öne çıkan ilkçi (primordialist) ve inşaacı (constructivist) yaklaşımlardan farklı olarak etno-sembolcü bir yaklaşım benimseyen bu çalışma, Tunus’ta milliyetçi harekete önderlik eden liderlerin dini sembolleri kullanarak bir ulus-devlet kurmayı amaçladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma bu bağlamda, bağımsızlık öncesi dönemde etkili olan ideolojik ve siyasi mücadeleler ışığında milliyetçi hareketin din konusundaki tutumunun anlaşılabileceğini savunmaktadır. Tunus’ta milliyetçi seçkinlerin kendi ideolojik ve siyasi hedeflerine ulaşmak için dini sembolleri araçsallaştırdıklarını vurgulayan bu çalışmada, etno-sembolcü yaklaşımın milliyetçilik alanındaki diğer yaklaşımlardan daha kapsamlı bir bakış açısı sunduğu iddia edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, H. R. (2020). Assessment of The Relation of Nationalist Movement and Religion in Tunisia in the Pre-Independence Period from An Ethnosymbolic Approach (1911-1956). Bilig, 185–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/13147

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abadi, Jacob (2013). Tunisia Since the Arab Conquest: The Saga of a Westernized Muslim State. Cornwall: Ithaca Press.
  2. Anderson, Lisa (1987). The State and Social Transformation in Tunisia and Libya: 1830-1980. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  3. Anderson, Benedict (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London ve New York: Verso. Armstrong, John A. (2000). “Nations Before Nationalism”. Nationalism: Critical Concepts in Political Science. Ed. John Hutchinson and Anthony D. Smith. V. I. London and NY: Routledge. 216-243.
  4. Ayadi, Toufik (1989). “Insurrection et Religion en Tunisie: L’exemple de Thala Kasserine (1906) et du Jellaz (1911). Révolte et société. Ed. Direction des Archives de France. Paris: Histoire au Présent. 166-175.
  5. Brown, Leon C. (1964). “Stages in the Process of Change”. Tunisia: The Politics of Modernization. Ed. Charles A. Micaud. New York: F. A. Preager. 3-69.
  6. Charrad, Mounira (2001). States and Women’s Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  7. Green, Arnold H. (1978). The Tunisian Ulama 1873-1915: Social Structure and Response to Ideological Currents. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Guibernau, Montserrat (2004). “Anthony David Smith on nations and national identity: a critical assessment”. Nations and Nationalism 10 (1/2): 125-141.
  8. Hamza, Hassine-Raouf (1987). “Eléments pour réflexion sur l’histoire du mouvement national pendant l’entre-deux-guerres: La scission du Destour de mars 1934”. Les Mouvements Politiques et Sociales Dans la Tunisie des Années Trente. Ed. Moncef Chenoufi. Tunis: Ministere de l’Education, de l’Enseignement et de la Recherche Scientifique. 51-78.
  9. Hermassi, Elbaki (1972). Leadership and National Development in North Africa: A Comparative Study. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  10. Jones, Richard E. (1977). “The Naturalization Crisis of 1933 in Tunisia: French Analysis and Tunisian Response”. Revue d’histoire Maghrébine 7(8): 165-178.
  11. Kaufman, Stuart J. (2001).
  12. Modern Hatreds, The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  13. Kraiem, Mustapha (1990). Pouvoir colonial et Mouvement national. Tunis: Alif. Kubik, Jan (2003). “Cultural Legacies of State Socialism: History-making and Cultural-Political Entrepreneurship in Postcommunist Poland and Russia”. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Ed. Grzegorz Ekiert and Stephen E. Hanson. Cambridg