SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 97 Sayı: 1

Identification of suitable housekeeping genes for qPCR in the corpus luteum, cortex, and medulla of the bovine ovary

Sığır ovaryumunda korpus luteum, korteks ve medullada qPCR için uygun housekeeping genlerin belirlenmesi

Gonca Sönmez(Selcuk University)0000-0002-4946-3749
Mehmet Cevat Temizkan(YOZGAT BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4353-6759
Muhammed Hüdai Çulha(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8963-5605
Duygu Merve Çalişkan(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8064-9146
Yunus Emre Deniz(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0009-0005-9847-3061
Hasan Alkan(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8332-5334
Pages
17–28
Publication Date
2026-01-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Across all tissues, RPL37A + PPIA provided the most reliable normalization, with RPL37A overall the most stable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Accurate normalization with stable reference genes is critical for reliable quantitative PCR (qPCR).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study evaluated the stability of four reference genes (PPIA, HSP90AB1, RPL37A, RPS17) across bovine ovary regions (cortex, medulla, corpus luteum).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Across all tissues, RPL37A + PPIA provided the most reliable normalization, with RPL37A overall the most stable.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sığır reprodüksiyonu · Gen stabilitesi · Normalizasyon

Abstract

Accurate normalization with stable reference genes is critical for reliable quantitative PCR (qPCR). Reference gene stability differs by tissue, stage, and condition and inappropriate selection may bias results. In bovine ovarian tissues, commonly used genes such as ACTB and GAPDH have shown instability, emphasizing the need for alternative candidates. This study evaluated the stability of four reference genes (PPIA, HSP90AB1, RPL37A, RPS17) across bovine ovary regions (cortex, medulla, corpus luteum). Ovarian tissues were collected post-mortem from six healthy cows, and RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were performed. Stability was assessed with geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper, both tissue-specific and across the whole ovary. All primers showed high efficiency (90–110%) and R² >0.99. Results revealed tissue-specific variation: in the cortex, RPL37A or RPS17 was most stable; in the medulla, RPL37A and RPS17 were consistent across algorithms; in the corpus luteum, RPL37A and PPIA were stable. Across all tissues, RPL37A + PPIA provided the most reliable normalization, with RPL37A overall the most stable. In contrast, HSP90AB1 was unstable and unsuitable. However, the small sample size is a limitation of this study. These findings indicate that ribosomal genes (RPL37A, RPS17) are more stable than PPIA in bovine ovarian tissues, providing methodological guidance for accurate gene expression studies and contributing valuable insights to reproductive biology research, particularly under physiological conditions.

Özet

Stabil referans genlerle doğru normalizasyon, güvenilir kantitatif PCR (qPCR) analizleri için kritik öneme sahiptir. Referans gen stabilitesi doku, gelişim evresi ve fizyolojik koşullara göre farklılık gösterir ve yanlış seçimi sonuçları yanıltabilir. Sığır ovaryum dokularında yaygın kullanılan ACTB ve GAPDH genlerinin stabil olmadığının gösterilmesi, alternatif adaylara duyulan ihtiyacı ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmada, dört referans genin (PPIA, HSP90AB1, RPL37A, RPS17) stabilitesi sığır ovaryumunun farklı bölgelerinde (korteks, medulla, korpus luteum) değerlendirilmiştir. Ovaryum dokuları, altı sağlıklı inekten post-mortem olarak toplanmış, RNA izolasyonu ve cDNA sentezi yapılmıştır. Stabilite, geNorm, NormFinder ve BestKeeper algoritmalarıyla hem dokuya özgü hem de tüm ovaryum genelinde incelenmiştir. Tüm primerler yüksek verimlilik (%90–110) ve R² >0.99 değerleri göstermiştir. Bulgular dokuya özgü farklılıklar ortaya koymuştur: Kortekste RPL37A veya RPS17 en stabil gen olarak belirlenmiştir; medullada RPL37A ve RPS17 algoritmalar arasında tutarlı bulunmuştur; korpus luteumda RPL37A ve PPIA stabil kalmıştır. Tüm dokular birlikte değerlendirildiğinde RPL37A + PPIA en güvenilir normalizasyonu sağlamış, RPL37A genel olarak en stabil gen olmuştur. Buna karşılık HSP90AB1 instabil bulunmuş ve uygun değildir. Bununla birlikte, küçük örneklem büyüklüğü bu çalışmanın bir sınırlılığıdır. Bu bulgular, ribozomal genlerin (RPL37A, RPS17) sığır ovaryum dokularında PPIA’ya göre daha yüksek stabilite gösterdiğini ortaya koyarak, gen ekspresyon çalışmalarına metodolojik rehberlik sunmakta ve özellikle fizyolojik koşullar altında yürütülen reprodüktif biyoloji araştırmalarına değerli katkılar sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sönmez, G., Temizkan, M. C., Çulha, M. H., Çalişkan, D. M., Deniz, Y. E., Alkan, H. (2026). Identification of suitable housekeeping genes for qPCR in the corpus luteum, cortex, and medulla of the bovine ovary. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 97 Sayı: 1, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.33188/vetheder.1792113

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of veterinary anatomy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009.
  2. König HE, Liebich HG. Veterinary anatomy of domestic mammals: textbook and colour atlas. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2004.
  3. Romereim SM, Summers AF, Pohlmeier WE, Zhang P, Hou X, Talbott HA, et al. Gene expression profiling of bovine ovarian follicular and luteal cells provides insight into cellular identities and functions. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;439:379-394.
  4. Bonnet M, Bernard L, Bes S, Leroux C. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalisation in adipose tissue, muscle, liver and mammary gland from ruminants. Animal. 2013;7(8):1344-1353.
  5. Saremi B, Sauerwein H, Dänicke S, Mielenz M. Identification of reference genes for gene expression studies in different bovine tissues focusing on different fat depots. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(6):3131-3138.
  6. Sozoniuk M, Jamioł M, Kankofer M, Kowalczyk K. Reference gene selection in bovine caruncular epithelial cells under pregnancy-associated hormones exposure. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12742.
  7. Rekawiecki R, Rutkowska J, Kotwica J. Identification of optimal housekeeping genes for examination of gene expression in bovine corpus luteum. Reprod Biol. 2012;12(4):362-367.
  8. Rekawiecki R, Kowalik MK, Kotwica J. Validation of housekeeping genes for studying differential gene expression in the bovine myometrium. Acta Vet Hung. 2013;61(4):505-516.
  9. Baddela VS, Baufeld A, Yenuganti VR, Vanselow J, Singh D. Suitable housekeeping genes for normalization of transcript abundance analysis by real-time RT-PCR in cultured bovine granulosa cells during hypoxia and differential cell plating density. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:118.
  10. Schoen K, Plendl J, Gabler C, Kaessmeyer S. Identification of stably expressed reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization in defined localizations of cyclic bovine ovaries. Anat Histol Embryol. 2015;44(3):200-211.
  11. Asiabi P, Ambroise J, Giachini C, Coccia ME, Bearzatto B, Chiti MC, et al. Assessing and validating housekeeping genes in normal, cancerous, and polycystic human ovaries. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(10):2545-2553.
  12. Nikishin DA, Filatov MA, Kiseleva MV, Bagaeva TS, Konduktorova VV, Khramova YV, et al. Selection of stable expressed reference genes in native and vitrified/thawed human ovarian tissue for analysis by qRT-PCR and Western blot. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(10):1851-1860.
  13. Cheng L, Yu J, Hu X, Xiang M, Xia Y, Tao B, et al. Identification of reliable reference genes for expression studies in maternal reproductive tissues and foetal tissues of pregnant cows. Reprod Domest Anim. 2020;55(11):1554-1564.
  14. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53(D1):D609-D617.
  15. Shan Y, Qin S, Xu R, Gao Y, Pei C, Ma J, et al. Reference gene selection for real-time quantitative PCR analysis on ovarian cryopreservation by vitrification in mice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(8):1277-1284.
  16. Jain N, Mitre I, Nitisa D, Pirsko V, Cakstina-Dzerve I. Identification of novel endogenous controls for qPCR normalization in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cell line. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(10):1631.
  17. Haase M, Fitze G. HSP90AB1: helping the good and the bad. Gene. 2016;575(2 Pt 1):171-186.
  18. Sheridan MP, Browne JA, MacHugh DE, Costello E, Gormley E. Impact of delayed processing of bovine peripheral blood on differential gene expression. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2012;145(1-2):199-205.
  19. Li L, Sun Y, Wu J, Li X, Luo M, Wang G. The global effect of heat on gene expression in cultured bovine mammary epithelial cells. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2015;20(2):381-389.
  20. Maeda Y, Ohtsuka H, Tomioka M, Oikawa M. Effect of progesterone on Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T cell-related genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during pregnancy in cows. Vet Res Commun. 2013;37(1):43-49.
  21. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3(7):RESEARCH0034.
  22. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization. Cancer Res. 2004;64(15):5245-5250.
  23. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26(6):509-515.