SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Netnographic Analysis of the Covid-19 Posts of the Big Four Football Clubs and Their Fan’s on Twitter

Dört Büyük Futbol Kulübünün ve Taraftarlarının Twitter’daki Covid-19 Paylaşımlarının Netnografik Analizi

Pelin Gönkek(Ege Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi)0000-0001-9123-4440
Nahit Köker(Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi)0000-0002-8622-865X
R. Timuçin Gençer(Ege Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi)0000-0003-0159-2610
Pages
521–534
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, in the period of the Covid-19 epidemic, while it is seen that football fans unite in a common culture by posting similar hashtags about the Covid-19 epidemic on Twitter, it is seen that football clubs post less place to content related to the epidemic less than fan groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Covid-19, which first appeared in Wuhan, China, and caused the death of many people, caused the structures within the sports industry to change as well as in all industries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose of this research is to analyze the post of the most followed clubs and their fans on Twitter about Covid-19 in the Turkish Football Federation Super League.The study, a total of 2,971 hashtags related to Covid-19 were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, in the period of the Covid-19 epidemic, while it is seen that football fans unite in a common culture by posting similar hashtags about the Covid-19 epidemic on Twitter, it is seen that football clubs post less place to content related to the epidemic less than fan groups.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Medya · Taraftar · Kültür

Abstract

Covid-19, which first appeared in Wuhan, China, and caused the death of many people, caused the structures within the sports industry to change as well as in all industries. In this period, sports organizations try to use social media tools effectively in order to stay in touch with their fans. Purpose of this research is to analyze the post of the most followed clubs and their fans on Twitter about Covid-19 in the Turkish Football Federation Super League.The study, a total of 2,971 hashtags related to Covid-19 were analyzed. The number of posts and percentages of tweets by fans and football clubs about Covid-19 was also included in the analysis. In this way, the contents of the Twitter posts of both fans and football clubs regarding Covid-19 were determined. The netnography method was used as the working method. The hashtags performed by the fans on Twitter were analyzed by the content analysis method. According to the findings, Fenerbahçe SK and its followers have become the football club that produced the most content (80.46%) regarding the Covid-19 outbreak. Although Galatasaray SC fans have produced the most hashtags, Galatasaray SK (16.5%) has produced the least amount of content about the epidemic. As a result, in the period of the Covid-19 epidemic, while it is seen that football fans unite in a common culture by posting similar hashtags about the Covid-19 epidemic on Twitter, it is seen that football clubs post less place to content related to the epidemic less than fan groups.

Özet

İlk kez Çin’in Wuhan kentinde ortaya çıkarak pek çok kişinin ölümüne neden olan Covid-19, tüm endüstrilerde olduğu gibi spor endüstrisi içerisindeki yapıların da değişmesine neden olmuştur. Bu dönemde spor organizasyonları, taraftarlarıyla iletişimde kalabilmek için sosyal medya araçlarını etkin bir şekilde kullanmaya çalışmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu Süper Ligi'nde en çok takip edilen kulüplerin ve taraftarlarının Twitter'daki Covid-19 ile ilgili paylaşımlarını analiz etmektir. Çalışmada Covid-19 ile ilgili toplam 2.971 hashtag analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca taraftarın ve futbol kulüplerinin Covid-19 ile ilgili tweetlerine ilişkin paylaşım sayıları ve yüzdeleri de analizlere dahil edilmiştir. Bu sayede hem taraftarın hem de futbol kulüplerinin Covid-19 ile ilgili Twitter paylaşımlarının içerikleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışma yöntemi olarak netnografi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Taraftarların Twitter’da gerçekleştirdikleri hashtagler içerik analizi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre, Fenerbahçe SK ve taraftarları Covid-19 salgınına ilişkin en fazla içerik üreten (%80,46) futbol kulübüdür. En fazla hashtag üreten taraftarların, Galatasaray SK taraftarları olmasına rağmen salgın ile ilgili en az içeriği olan kulüp Galatasaray SK’dir (%16,5). Sonuç olarak, Covid-19 salgını ilk döneminde futbol taraftarlarının Twitter’da, Covid-19 salgını konusunda benzer hashtagler üreterek ortak bir kültürde birleştikleri görülürken, futbol kulüplerinin salgına ilişkin içeriklere taraftar gruplarına kıyasla daha az oranda yer verdikleri görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gönkek, P., Köker, N., Gençer, R. T. (2021). Netnographic Analysis of the Covid-19 Posts of the Big Four Football Clubs and Their Fan’s on Twitter. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 521–534. https://doi.org/10.25307/jssr.979295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (66)

  1. Addeo, F., Paoli, A. D., Esposito, M. & Bolcato, M. Y. (2019). Doing social research on online communities: The benefits of netnography Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajss.7-1-1
  2. Allen, J., Rowan, L. & Singh, P. (2020). Teaching and teacher education in the time of covid-19. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 233-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1752051
  3. Assaf, A. & Scuderi, R. (2020). Covid-19 and the recovery of the tourism industry. Tourism Economics, 26(5), 731–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816620933712
  4. Atmaca, D. ve Toygur, H. (2021). Fenerbahçe futbol takımı'nın 1959 öncesi şampiyonluklarına Instagram ve ekşi sözlük etkileşiminde bakabilmek: Netnografi çalışması örneği. ROL Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(3),25-532. 10.29228/roljournal.52318
  5. Barnfield, A. F. (2013). Sport, movement, and the event: Understanding the expressivity of football. Doctoral dissertation, University College London, United Kingdom.
  6. Baruah, R. D. & Angelov, P. (2012). Evolving social network analysis: A case study on mobile phone data. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (ss. 114-120). IEEE. 10.1109/EAIS.2012.6232815
  7. Begović, M. (2020). Effects of covid-19 on society and sport a national response. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1779115
  8. Biscaia, R., Ross, S., Yoshida, M., Correia, A., Rosado, A. & Marôco, J. (2016). Investigating the role of fan club membership on perceptions of team brand equity in football. Sport Management Review, 19(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2015.02.001
  9. Bond, A. J., Cockayne, D., Ludvigsen, J. A. L., Maguire, K., Parnell, D., Plumley, D.,. & Wilson, R. (2020). Covid-19: The return of football fans. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1841449
  10. Cade, N. L. (2018). Corporate social media: How two-way disclosure channels influence investors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68, 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.004
  11. Chew, C. & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PloS one, 5(11), e14118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014118
  12. Clark, H. & Gruending, A. (2020). Invest in health and uphold rights to “build back better” after covid-19. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1781583
  13. Dube, K., Nhamo, G., & Chikodzi, D. (2020). Covid-19 cripples global restaurant and hospitality industry. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(11), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1773416
  14. Escamilla-Fajardo, P., Núñez-Pomar, J. M., Calabuig-Moreno, F. & Gómez-Tafalla, A. M. (2020). Effects of the covid-19 pandemic on sports entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 12(20), 8493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208493
  15. Evans, A. B., Blackwell, J., Dolan, P., Fahlén, J., Hoekman, R., Lenneis, V.,. & Wilcock, L. (2020). Sport in the face of the covid-19 pandemic: Towards an agenda for research in the sociology of sport. European Journal for Sport and Society, 17(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2020.1765100
  16. Farzanegan, M. R., Gholipour, H. F., Feizi, M., Nunkoo, R. & Andargoli, A. E. (2020). International tourism and outbreak of coronavirus (Covid-19): A cross-country analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 60(3), 687-692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520931593
  17. Fiesler, C. & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of twitter research ethics. Social Media+ Society, 4(1),1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366
  18. Gaffney, A., Himmelstein, D. U. & Woolhandler, S. (2020). Covid-19 and US health financing: Perils and possibilities. International Journal of Health Services, 50(4), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420931431
  19. Gostin, L. O., Habibi, R. & Meier, B. M. (2020). Has global health law risen to meet the covıd-19 challenge? Revisiting the international health regulations to prepare for future threats. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 48(2), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520935354
  20. Gössling, S., Scott, D. & Hall, C. M. (2020). Pandemics, tourism and global change: A Rapid assessment of covid-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(1),1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708
  21. Gratzer, D., Torous, J., Lam, R. W., Patten, S. B., Kutcher, S., Chan, S., … Yatham, L. N. (2021). Our digital moment: ınnovations and opportunities in digital mental health care. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(1),5-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743720937833
  22. Grix, J., Brannagan, P. M., Grimes, H. & Neville, R. (2021). The impact of covid-19 on sport. International Journal Of Sport Policy And Politics, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2020.1851285
  23. Gupta, N. (2020). Singing away the social distancing blues: Art therapy in a time of coronavirus. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(5), 593-603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820927807
  24. Hendrickx, F., Taes, S. & Wouters, M. (2020). Covid-19 and labour law in Belgium. European Labour Law Journal, 11(3), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952520934554
  25. Heyang, T. & Martin, R. (2020). A reimagined world: international tertiary dance education in light of covid-19. Research in Dance Education, 22(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2020.1780206
  26. Koçdemir, M. (2020). Türkiye futbol federasyonu mali verilerinin amatör futbolun finansmanı açısından analizi. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(2), 93-106.
  27. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage Publications.
  28. Kramer, A. & Kramer, K. Z. (2020). The potential impact of the covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119:103442, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442
  29. Kuyucu, M. (2015). Social media and public relations in football: The use of twitter in football teams in Turkey. The Online Journal of Communication and Media, 1(4), 161-175.
  30. Langer, R. & Beckman, S. C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510592454
  31. Lodi, E., Scavone, A., Carollo, A., Guicciardi, C., Reggianini, L., Savino, G. & Modena, M. G. (2020). Ripresa dell’attività sportiva in seguito a pandemia COVID-19. Come comportarsi?. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia, 21(7), 514-522. 10.1714/3386.33637
  32. Mangan, D. (2020). Covid-19 and labour law in the United Kingdom. European Labour Law Journal, 11(3), 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952520934583
  33. Marwick, A. E. (2014). Ethnographic and qualitative research on Twitter. Twitter and Society, 89, 109-121.
  34. Meier, H. E., Strauss, B. & Riedl, D. (2017). Feminization of sport audiences and fans? Evidence from the German men’s national soccer team. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(6), 712-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215612457
  35. Minkler, M., Griffin, J. & Wakimoto, P. (2020). Seizing the Moment: Policy advocacy to end mass incarceration in the time of covid-19. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120933281
  36. Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’online due to the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
  37. Moritz, S., Gottschick, C., Horn, J., Popp, M., Langer, S., Klee, B.,. & Mikolajczyk, R. (2021). The risk of indoor sports and culture events for the transmission of covid-19. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/0.1101/2020.10.28.20221580
  38. Nicola, M., Alsafi, Z., Sohrabi, C., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C.,. & Agha, R. (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (covid-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
  39. Nwagbara, U. & Reid, P. (2013). Corporate social responsibility communication in the age of new media: Towards the logic of sustainability communication. Revista de Management Comparat International, 14(3), 400-414.
  40. Parnell, D., Widdop, P., Bond, A. & Wilson, R. (2020). Covid-19, networks and sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1750100
  41. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  42. Popelier, P. (2020). Covid-19 legislation in Belgium at the crossroads of a political and a health crisis. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 8(1-2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1771884
  43. Posegga, O. & Jungherr, A. (2019, January). Characterizing political talk on Twitter: A comparison between public agenda, media agendas, and the Twitter agenda with regard to topics and dynamics. In Proceedings Of The 52nd Hawaii İnternational Conference on System Sciences (ss. 2590-2599). United States. 10.24251/HICSS.2019.312
  44. Rajkumar, R. P. (2020). Covid-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal Of Psychiatry, 52(2020),1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066
  45. Soygüden, A. (2016). Profesyonel futbol kulüplerinin gelir kaynaklarinin incelenmesi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(4), 21-35.
  46. Taylor, L. & Conn, D. (2020). Premier league clubs set for £500m collective loss due to coronavirus. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/jun/11/premier-league-clubs-set-for-500m-collective-loss-due-to-coronavirus
  47. Tesar, M. (2020). Towards a post-covid-19 ‘new normality?’: Physical and social distancing, the move to online and higher education. Policy Futures in Education, 18(5), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320935671
  48. Thornton, L. (2020). Music education at a distance. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(3), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083720928615
  49. Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu. (2020, Mart 12). Müsabakalarda Uygulanacak Covid-19 Tedbirlerine İlişkin Talimat. https://www.tff.org/default.aspx?pageID=687&ftxtID=33152
  50. Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu. (2020, Mart 19). Ligler İleri Bir Tarihe Ertelendi. https://www.tff.org/default.aspx?pageID=687&ftxtID=33181
  51. Türkmen, M. ve Özsarı, A. (2020). Covid-19 salgını ve spor sektörüne etkileri. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 8(2), 55-67. 10.14486/IntJSCS.2020.596
  52. Vallerand, R. J., Ntoumanis, N., Philippe, F. L., Lavigne, G. L., Carbonneau, N., Bonneville, A.,. & Maliha, G. (2008). On passion and sports fans: A look at football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(12), 1279-1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802123185
  53. Vardı, A. (2021). Spor endüstrisinde sponsorluk ve yayın hakları ekseninde covid-19 depremi. Aurum Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 41-57.
  54. Vegara-Ferri, J. M., Carboneros, M., Deliautaite, K., Díaz-Suárez, A. & López-Gullón, J. M. (2020). Fan’s perspective on professional leagues and sporting events during covid-19 confinement period. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 16(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.164.07
  55. Vigo, D., Patten, S., Pajer, K., Krausz, M., Taylor, S., Rush, B.,. & Yatham, L. N. (2020). Mental health of communities during the covid-19 pandemic. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 65(10), 681-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743720926676
  56. Webb, T. (2020). The future of officiating: Analysing the impact of covid-19 on referees in world football. Soccer & Society, 22(1-2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2020.1768634
  57. Weed, M. & Foad, A. (2020). Rapid scoping review of evidence of outdoor transmission of covid-19. MedRxiv, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.20188417
  58. World Health Organization. (2021, Nisan 24). WHO Coronavirus (Covid-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/
  59. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
  60. Yılmaz, H. (2020). Spor pazarlamasında tüketicilerin taraftar kimliklerinin sponsor markalara yönelik tercihlerine etkisi: farklı ilgilenim düzeylerindeki ürün gruplarında deneysel bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı Pazarlama Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  61. Bond, A. J., Cockayne, D., Ludvigsen, J. A. L., Maguire, K., Parnell, D., Plumley, D.,. & Wilson, R. (2020). Covid-19: The return of football fans. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1841449
  62. Evans, A. B., Blackwell, J., Dolan, P., Fahlén, J., Hoekman, R., Lenneis, V.,. & Wilcock, L. (2020). Sport in the face of the covid-19 pandemic: Towards an agenda for research in the sociology of sport. European Journal for Sport and Society, 17(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2020.1765100
  63. Moritz, S., Gottschick, C., Horn, J., Popp, M., Langer, S., Klee, B.,. & Mikolajczyk, R. (2021). The risk of indoor sports and culture events for the transmission of covid-19. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/0.1101/2020.10.28.20221580
  64. Nicola, M., Alsafi, Z., Sohrabi, C., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C.,. & Agha, R. (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (covid-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
  65. Vallerand, R. J., Ntoumanis, N., Philippe, F. L., Lavigne, G. L., Carbonneau, N., Bonneville, A.,. & Maliha, G. (2008). On passion and sports fans: A look at football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(12), 1279-1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802123185
  66. Vigo, D., Patten, S., Pajer, K., Krausz, M., Taylor, S., Rush, B.,. & Yatham, L. N. (2020). Mental health of communities during the covid-19 pandemic. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 65(10), 681-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743720926676