SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Perception of Women in Sports in Türkiye in the 21st Century

Özge Ada(Manisa Celal Bayar University The Graduate School)0000-0002-8623-2771
Selhan Özbey(MANISA CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCES)0000-0003-4844-6338
Pages
302–324
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Codes regarding participants' general perceptions of women were grouped under the theme of “cultural situations”, while views specifically addressing women in sports were categorized under the themes of “cultural contexts”, “women’s individual gains,” and “sport-specific conditions for women.” Research findings indicate that in 21st-century Türkiye, the perception of women varies significantly by region, with women occasionally being viewed as second-class citizens and subjected to various inequalities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary objective of this study is to examine perceptions of women in sports through the insights of male and female stakeholders at various levels of the Turkish sports ecosystem from the 2000s to the present.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 20 volunteers, selected via purposive sampling, representing diverse roles, including administrators, academics, coaches, athletes, and referees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Codes regarding participants' general perceptions of women were grouped under the theme of “cultural situations”, while views specifically addressing women in sports were categorized under the themes of “cultural contexts”, “women’s individual gains,” and “sport-specific conditions for women.” Research findings indicate that in 21st-century Türkiye, the perception of women varies significantly by region, with women occasionally being viewed as second-class citizens and subjected to various inequalities.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:21st century · Perception · Gender

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to examine perceptions of women in sports through the insights of male and female stakeholders at various levels of the Turkish sports ecosystem from the 2000s to the present. This study employed a phenomenology-based qualitative research approach and was supported by a case study design. Data collection was conducted through personal information forms and semi-structured interview questions. The study group consisted of 20 volunteers, selected via purposive sampling, representing diverse roles, including administrators, academics, coaches, athletes, and referees. Data obtained from audio recordings were analyzed using descriptive methods. To ensure reliability, the data were coded independently by three expert researchers, and themes corresponding to the research questions were established. Codes regarding participants' general perceptions of women were grouped under the theme of “cultural situations”, while views specifically addressing women in sports were categorized under the themes of “cultural contexts”, “women’s individual gains,” and “sport-specific conditions for women.” Research findings indicate that in 21st-century Türkiye, the perception of women varies significantly by region, with women occasionally being viewed as second-class citizens and subjected to various inequalities. Within the sporting context, however, the prevailing view is that differences between men and women are purely biological and that both genders are otherwise equal. The findings also highlight that while the number of female sports scientists and athletes exceeds that of female administrators and referees, female representation remains insufficient across all sports-related roles. Consequently, participants emphasized the need for greater institutional support for women. In conclusion, the study underscores the vital importance of women across all facets of sports, demonstrating a strong consensus that their presence is crucial to overcoming systemic challenges.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ada, Ö., Özbey, S., *, Ö. A. (2026). Perception of Women in Sports in Türkiye in the 21st Century. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 302–324. https://doi.org/10.25307/jssr.1911154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (61)

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. [CrossRef]
  2. Ada, Ö. (2019). Türkiye’de 21. yüzyılda sporda kadın algısı [Perception of women in sports in Turkey in the 21st century] (Master’s thesis, Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi). YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
  3. Ada, Ö., Yıldız, K., Güzel, P., & Özbey, S. (2021). Sporcu bakış açısıyla kadın algısı [Perception of women from an athlete's perspective]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (43), 277–291. [CrossRef]
  4. Akın, A. (2007). Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği ve sağlık [Gender inequality and health]. Toplum Hekimliği Bülteni, 26(2), 1–9.
  5. Aksöz, F., & Arslan, B. (2023). Toplumsal cinsiyet sarmalında Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde kadın olmak: Şanlıurfa ilindeki kadınların toplumsal tükenmişlik düzeyleri [Being a woman in the Southeastern Anatolia Region in the gender spiral: Social burnout levels of women in Şanlıurfa province]. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(3), 1520–1545. [CrossRef]
  6. Bayraktar, G. (2023). İkinci dalga feminist hareketin feminizmin gelişimindeki dönüştürücü rolü [The transformative role of the second-wave feminist movement in the development of feminism]. Advances in Women’s Studies, 5(2), 49–56. [CrossRef]
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]
  8. Brink, H. I. (1993). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Curationis, 16(2), 35-38.
  9. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  10. Burton, L. J. (2015). Underrepresentation of women in sport leadership: A review of research. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 155–165. [CrossRef]
  11. Burton, L. J., & Leberman, S. (Eds.). (2017). Women in sport leadership: Research and practice for change. Routledge. [CrossRef]
  12. Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2020). Gender norms and social norms: Differences, similarities, and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(2), 407–422. [CrossRef]
  13. Claringbould, I., & Knoppers, A. (2012). Paradoxical practices of gender in sport-related organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 26(5), 404–416. [CrossRef]
  14. Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
  15. Cooky, C., Dycus, R., & Dworkin, S. L. (2013). “What Makes a Woman a Woman?” Versus “Our First Lady of Sport” A Comparative Analysis of the United States and the South African Media Coverage of Caster Semenya. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 37(1), 31-56. [CrossRef]
  16. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  17. Demiran, D., & Özbey, S. (2025). Sporda dijital dönüşüm süreci ve yeni uygulamalar [The digital transformation process in sports and new applications]. Turkuaz Uluslararası Sosyo-Ekonomik Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(2), 270–294. [CrossRef]
  18. Dionne, M. (2020). Sociocultural barriers to women’s participation in sport: The role of self-objectification and stereotype threat. Sport Information Resource Centre. https://sirc.ca/articles/sociocultural-barriers-to-womens-participation-in-sport-the-role-of-self-objectification-and-stereotype-threat/
  19. Durmaz, M. (2025). Kadın sporcuların toplumsal rollerinin dönüşümü [Transformation of the social roles of female athletes]. Turkish Academic Studies - TURAS, 6(1), 102-117. [CrossRef]
  20. Elmas, S., & Aşçı, F. H. (2022). Gender-stereotyped barriers against women football players in Türkiye: A qualitative perspective on Eccles’ expectancy-value theory. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 13(3), 146–173. [CrossRef]
  21. Ersoy, E. (2009). Cinsiyet kültürü içerisinde kadın ve erkek kimliği: Malatya örneği [Female and male identity within gender culture: The case of Malatya]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 209–230.
  22. Evans, A. B., & Pfister, G. U. (2021). Women in sports leadership: A systematic narrative review. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 56(3), 317–342. [CrossRef]
  23. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. [CrossRef]
  24. Fullagar, S., Rich, E., Pavlidis, A., & van Ingen, C. (Eds.). (2021). Transforming sport and physical cultures through feminist knowledges. Routledge.
  25. Geurin-Eagleman, A. N., & Burch, L. M. (2016). Communicating via photographs: A gendered analysis of Olympic athletes’ visual self-presentation on Instagram. Sport Management Review, 19(2), 133–145. [CrossRef]
  26. Gökoğlu, S. (2021). Türkiye’de toplumsal cinsiyet algısı [Gender perception in Turkey]. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 7(82), 2049–2058. [CrossRef]
  27. Guttmann, A. (1991). Women’s sports: A history. Columbia University Press.
  28. Hargreaves, J. (1994). Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports. Routledge.
  29. Hovden, J. (2012). Discourses and strategies for the inclusion of women in sport–the case of Norway. Sport in Society, 15(3), 287-301. [CrossRef]
  30. Hutchins, B., & Rowe, D. (2012). Sport beyond television: The internet, digital media and the rise of networked media sport. Routledge. [CrossRef]
  31. Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1), Article 23606. [CrossRef]
  32. International Olympic Committee. (2023). IOC gender equality and inclusion report 2021–2024. International Olympic Committee.
  33. Kantar, G., Ersöz, G., İnce Yenilmez, M., Çetinkaya, D., & Sıvış, E. (2023). Kadın sporcuların Twitter ve haber kanallarındaki toplumsal cinsiyet analizi [Gender analysis of female athletes on Twitter and news channels]. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, (94), 77–93. [CrossRef]
  34. Kavasoğlu, İ., & Yaşar, M. (2016). Toplumsal cinsiyet normlarının dışındaki sporcular [Athletes outside gender norms]. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(3), 118–132.
  35. Koca, C. (2024). Sporda toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği haritalama ve izleme çalışması: 2021–2023 güncellemesi [Mapping and monitoring study of gender equality in sports: 2021–2023 update]. CEİD Yayınları.
  36. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  37. Liu, Z., Shentu, M., Xue, Y., Yin, Y., Wang, Z., Tang, L., & Zheng, W. (2023). Sport–gender stereotypes and their impact on impression evaluations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 750. [CrossRef]
  38. Mansoor, A. (2016). “Marginalization” in third world feminism: Its problematics and theoretical reconfiguration. Palgrave Communications, 2, Article 16026. [CrossRef]
  39. Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  40. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  41. Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. [CrossRef]
  42. Nichols, E., Pavlidis, A., & Fullagar, S. (2023). Feminist new materialist entanglements with “kinetic excess” in women’s Muay Thai boxing: Moving with embodied discomfort as a post-qualitative coach-researcher. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 23(2), 130–145. [CrossRef]
  43. Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, gender and society. Temple Smith.
  44. Offen, K. M. (2000). European feminisms, 1700–1950: A political history. Stanford University Press.
  45. Özbey, S., & Güzel, P. (2011). Olimpik hareket ve kadın [The Olympic movement and women]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(25), 1–18.
  46. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  47. Pavlidis, A., & Fullagar, S. (2016). Sport, gender and power: The rise of roller derby. Routledge. [CrossRef]
  48. Pfister, G. (2010). Women in sport: Gender relations and future perspectives. Sport in Society, 13(2), 234–248. [CrossRef]
  49. Rowe, D. (2004). Sport, culture and the media: The unruly trinity (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
  50. Saguy, A. C. (2025). The social constructions of gender. Sociological Forum, 40(S1), S17–S28. [CrossRef]
  51. Shaw, S., & Frisby, W. (2006). Can gender equity be more equitable? Promoting an alternative frame for sport management research, education, and practice. Journal of Sport Management, 20(4), 483–509. [CrossRef]
  52. Singh, S. (2025). Empowering women through sports. Preprints. [CrossRef]
  53. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  54. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). 2023 Gender Social Norms Index (GSNI): Breaking down gender biases: Shifting social norms towards gender equality. https://hdr.undp.org/content/2023-gender-social-norms-index-gsni#/indicies/GSNI
  55. Vagle, M. D. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research (2nd ed.). Routledge. [CrossRef]
  56. Vamplew, W. (2016). Sport, industry and industrial sport in Britain before 1914: Review and revision. Sport in Society, 19(3), 340–355. [CrossRef]
  57. van Wyk, P. M., Seguin, H., Dionigi, R. A., Weir, P. L., & Horton, S. (2025). Women participating in sport: Tensions rising from negotiations of aging, gender norms, and personal responsibility for health in later life. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, Article 1655912. [CrossRef]
  58. Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., Mateo-Orcajada, A., Dağlı Ekmekçi, Y. A., Pereira, A., Amin, S., Meroño, L., González-Gálvez, N., Mülazımoğlu Ballı, Ö., Mendes, F., Mbah, O., Abenza-Cano, L., Leiva-Arcas, A., Doğan, Y. İ., Figueiredo, A., Ponce-Ramírez, C. M., Esparza-Ros, F., & Albaladejo-Saura, M. (2024). Gender equity in sport from the perspective of European women athletes and sport managers, physical education teachers and sport coaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1419578. [CrossRef]
  59. Williams, J. (2014). A contemporary history of women’s sport, part one: Sporting women, 1850–1960. Routledge. [CrossRef]
  60. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10th ed.) [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  61. Yüceol, N., Kakı, S., & Çekçi, I. (2022). Covid-19 pandemisinin Türkiye’de kadınların çalışma hayatına katılımı ve iş–yaşam dengesine etkilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği bağlamında incelenmesi [Examination of the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on women's participation in working life and work-life balance in Turkey in the context of gender equality]. Marmara Üniversitesi Kadın ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 45–64.