Journals / İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi / 2015 / Sayı: 44

Considerations whether Hajjâj b. Ilât had been buried in Erzurum/Kalikala

Teemülâtün fî Defni’s-Sahabî Haccâc ibni Ilât fi Erzurum / Kâlîkala

Pages
193–211
Publication Date
2015-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was a point of debate among his to riovas about the date of death and place of buriel of many of the Sahaba followers of the prophet Muhammad (pbh)This for the famous sahaba my god be pleased with them how about those who were less known or being famous No doubt it is moře question able except for the rare ones of sahaba whose deaths and place of burie were well kmown and decided in time and place Among those whose date of death and place of burie lwas al sahabi Hajjaj ibn ilat i gathered and discussed all that said by the Islamic historians to come to a result that he wasn't buried in Qaliqala without defining the real place because of the difference in texts in their views about that.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It was a point of debate among his to riovas about the date of death and place of buriel of many of the Sahaba followers of the prophet Muhammad (pbh)This for the famous sahaba my god be pleased with them how about those who were less known or being famous No doubt it is moře question able except for the rare ones of sahaba whose deaths and place of burie were well kmown and decided in time and place Among those whose date of death and place of burie lwas al sahabi Hajjaj ibn ilat i gathered and discussed all that said by the Islamic historians to come to a result that he wasn't buried in Qaliqala without defining the real place because of the difference in texts in their views about that.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was a point of debate among his to riovas about the date of death and place of buriel of many of the Sahaba followers of the prophet Muhammad (pbh)This for the famous sahaba my god be pleased with them how about those who were less known or being famous No doubt it is moře question able except for the rare ones of sahaba whose deaths and place of burie were well kmown and decided in time and place Among those whose date of death and place of burie lwas al sahabi Hajjaj ibn ilat i gathered and discussed all that said by the Islamic historians to come to a result that he wasn't buried in Qaliqala without defining the real place because of the difference in texts in their views about that.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was a point of debate among his to riovas about the date of death and place of buriel of many of the Sahaba followers of the prophet Muhammad (pbh)This for the famous sahaba my god be pleased with them how about those who were less known or being famous No doubt it is moře question able except for the rare ones of sahaba whose deaths and place of burie were well kmown and decided in time and place Among those whose date of death and place of burie lwas al sahabi Hajjaj ibn ilat i gathered and discussed all that said by the Islamic historians to come to a result that he wasn't buried in Qaliqala without defining the real place because of the difference in texts in their views about that.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sahabe · Haccac bin İlat · Erzurum

Abstract

It was a point of debate among his to riovas about the date of death and place of buriel of many of the Sahaba followers of the prophet Muhammad (pbh)This for the famous sahaba my god be pleased with them how about those who were less known or being famous No doubt it is moře question able except for the rare ones of sahaba whose deaths and place of burie were well kmown and decided in time and place Among those whose date of death and place of burie lwas al sahabi Hajjaj ibn ilat i gathered and discussed all that said by the Islamic historians to come to a result that he wasn't buried in Qaliqala without defining the real place because of the difference in texts in their views about that.

Özet

Sahabî Haccâc b. İlât’ın Erzurum/Kalikala’da Defni Hususunda MülahazalarSahabe-i Kiram (r.a.)'ın vefat tarihleri tarihçiler arasında ihtilaflıdır. Bu, meşhur sahabeler için de böyledir. Diğer sahabeler için ise şüphesiz konu hayli ihtilaflıdır. Az sayıda vefat tarihi sabit olan ve defin yeri malum olan sahabe hariç durum böyledir. Vefat tarihi ve defin yeri ile ilgili ihtilaf vaki olan sahabelerden biri büyük sahabi Haccac bin İlat'dır. Vefat tarihi ve yeri ile ilgili ihtilaf edilmiştir. Bu makalede ulemanın bu konudaki görüşlerini topladım ve onları değerlendirdim. Nereye ve ne zaman defnedildiği cevabına ulaştım.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELHUUT, M. (2015). Considerations whether Hajjâj b. Ilât had been buried in Erzurum/Kalikala. İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi, Sayı: 44, 193–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/130611

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Kaynakça Askalânî, İbn Hacer Ebü’l-Fadl Ahmed b. Ali b. Muhammed b. Muhammed. el-İsâbe fi temyîzi’s-Sahâbe. Thk. Ali Muhammed el-Becavî. Beyrut: Dârü’l-Cîl, h. 1412. Askalânî, İbn Hacer Ebü’l-Fadl Ahmed b. Ali b. Muhammed b. Muhammed. Ta‘cîlü’l-menfea bi zevaidi ricâli’l-eimmeti’l-erba‘a. Thk. İkramillah İmdadu’l-Hak. Beyrut: Dârü’l-Beşair, 1996. Belâzurî, Ahmed b. Yahya b. Cabir b. Davud. Fütuhu’l-Büldân. Beyrut: Dârü ve Mektebetü Hilal, ts. İbn Asâkir, Ebü’l-Kasım Ali b. Hasan b. Hibetillah. Târihu Dimaşk. Thk. Amr. b. Ğarame el-Amrevî. b.y. Dârü’l-Fikr, 1995.
  2. İbn Haldun, Abdurrahman b. Muhammed b. Muhammed. Dîvânü’l-mübtedâi ve’l-haber fi târihi’l- Arab ve’l-Berber ve men âsârahum min zevi’ş-şe’ni’l-ekber. Thk. Halil Şehade. 2. Baskı. Beyrut: Dârü’l- Fikr, 1988. İbnü’l-Esîr, Ebü’l-Hasan Ali b. Ebi’l-Kerem Muhammed b. Muhammed b. Abdulkerim b. Abdulvahid eş-Şeybânî el-Cezerî. Üsdü’l-gâbe fi ma‘rifeti’s-sahâbe. Thk. Ali Muhammed Muavvid - Adil Ahmed Abdulmevcud. b.y. Dârü’l-kütübi’l-ilmiyye, 1994. Râzî, İbn Ebi Hatim Ebû Muhammed Abdurrahman b. Ebi Hatim Muhammed b. İdris b. Münzir et-Temîmî el-Hanzalî. Tekaddümetu’l-ma‘rife li Kitabi’c-cerh ve’t-ta‘dîl. b.y. y.y. ts. Safedî, Salahaddin Halil b. Eybek b. Abdillah. el-Vâfî ve’l-vefeyât. Thk. Ahmed el-Arnavut - Türkî Mustafa, Beyrut: Dârü ihyai’t-turas, 2000. Sağânî, Ebü’l-Fedail Hasan b. Muhammed b. Haydar b. Ali. Durru’s-sehâbe fi beyâni mevâdı‘i vefeyâti’s- sahâbe. b.y. ts. Sübkî, Tacüddin b. Ali b. Abdülkafî. Tabakâtü’ş-şâfiiyyeti’l-kübrâ. Thk. Mahmud Muhammed et-Tenahi, Abdulfettah Muhammed Helv. 2. Baskı. b.y. Hicr li’t-tibaa ve’n-neşr ve’t-tevzi’, h. 1413. Şemsüddin Dimaşkî, Muhammed b. Ali b. Hasan b. Hamza el-Hüsseynî. el-İkmâl fî zikri men lehu rivâye fi Müsnedi’l-İmâm Ahmed mine’r-ricâl sivâ men zükira fî Tehzîbi’l-Kemâl. Thk. Abdulmutî Emin Kalacî. Karaçi: Menşuratü Camiati’d-dirasati’l-İslamiyye, ts. Şeybânî, Ebû Abdillah Ahmed b. Muhammed b Hanbel b. Hilal b. Esed. Fedâilü’s-Sahâbe, Thk. Vasyullah Muhammed Abbas. Beyrut: y.y. 1983. Tirmizî, Muhammed b. İsa Ebû İsa. es-Sahîh Sünen-i Tirmizî. Thk. Ahmed Muhammed Şakir, vd. Beyrut: Dârü İhyai’t-türasi’l-Arabî, ts.