SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE BRAIN (2D:4D RATIO) AND ITS IMPACT ON GENERATION Z CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING & MARKETING STRATEGIES

BEYİNDEKİ CİNSEL DİMORFİZM (2D:4D ORANI) VE Z KUŞAĞI TÜKETİCİ KARAR VERME SÜRECİNE VE PAZARLAMA STRATEJİLERİNE ETKİSİ

Esma Ebru Şentürk(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4528-1518
Pages
311–342
Publication Date
2025-05-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that individuals with a low 2D:4D ratio (male brain) differed from other female or male consumers on the BCC, NFC, PCC, SAC, and IDC dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research examines the effects of brain gender on consumer decision-making behaviors in addition to biological sex.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study in which the general survey model was used, a questionnaire was applied to 536 participants over the age of 18, and data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that individuals with a low 2D:4D ratio (male brain) differed from other female or male consumers on the BCC, NFC, PCC, SAC, and IDC dimensions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tüketici Karar Verme Tarzları · 2D:4D Oranı · Beyinde Cinsel Dimorfizm

Abstract

This research examines the effects of brain gender on consumer decision-making behaviors in addition to biological sex. In the study in which the general survey model was used, a questionnaire was applied to 536 participants over the age of 18, and data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests. While the findings support the effects of biological gender on consumer decision-making styles, brain gender is also a determining factor in decision-making processes. The findings revealed that individuals with a low 2D:4D ratio (male brain) differed from other female or male consumers on the BCC, NFC, PCC, SAC, and IDC dimensions. In brain gender-based promotion efforts, it is concluded that more effective marketing strategies should be directed by segmenting consumers according to behavioral and cognitive tendencies as well as biological gender. The study suggests that brain gender should be taken into account in marketing strategies to better understand consumer decisions. In addition, it makes an innovative contribution to marketing communication by revealing that a distinction based solely on biological gender is not enough in gender-based marketing strategies, and at this point, communication should be established by focusing on the cognitive and behavioral tendencies of the genders in terms of the 2D:4D ratio.

Özet

Bu araştırma, biyolojik cinsiyetin yanı sıra beyin cinsiyetinin tüketici karar verme davranışları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Genel tarama modelinin kullanıldığı çalışmada 18 yaş üstü 536 katılımcıya anket uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizi sırasında bağımsız değişkenler t testinden faydalanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, biyolojik cinsiyetin tüketici davranışları üzerindeki etkilerini desteklerken, beyin cinsiyetinin de karar verme süreçlerinde belirleyici bir faktör olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulgular BCC, NFC, PCC, SAC and IDC boyutlarında düşük 2D:4D oranına sahip bireylerin (erkek beyinli) diğer kadın ya da erkek tüketicilerden farklılaştığını ortaya koymuştur. Beyin cinsiyeti temelli tutundurma çalışmalarında tüketicileri biyolojik cinsiyet yerine davranışsal ve bilişsel eğilimlere göre segmente ederek daha etkili pazarlama stratejilerine yönelinmesi gerektiği sonucunu ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çalışma, pazarlama stratejilerinde tüketici kararlarını daha iyi anlamak için beyin cinsiyetinin dikkate alınması gerektiğini önermektedir. Ayrıca cinsiyet temelli pazarlama stratejilerinde yalnızca biyolojik cinsiyete göre yapılacak bir ayrımın yeterli olmadığı ve bu noktada cinsiyetlerin 2D:4D oranı açısından bilişsel ve davranışsal eğilimlerine odaklanılarak iletişim kurulması gerekliliğini ortaya koyarak pazarlama iletişimine yenilikçi bir katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şentürk, E. E. (2025). SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE BRAIN (2D:4D RATIO) AND ITS IMPACT ON GENERATION Z CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING & MARKETING STRATEGIES. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 311–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/1301044

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (84)

  1. Anič, I. D., Suleska, A. C., & Rajh, E. (2010). Decision-making styles of young-adult consumers in the Republic of Macedonia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 23(4), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2010.11517436
  2. Arsel, Z., Eräranta, K., & Moisander, J. (2015). Introduction: Theorising gender and gendering theory in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(15–16), 1553–1558. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1078396
  3. Bachtrog, D., Kirkpatrick, M., Mank, J. E., McDaniel, S. F., Pires, J. C., Rice, W. R., & Valenzuela, N. (2011). Are all sex chromosomes created equal? Trends in Genetics, 27(9), 350–357. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.05.005
  4. Bakewell, C., Mitchell, V. W., & Rothwell, M. (2006). UK generations Y male fashion consciousness. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1108/13612020610667487
  5. Bakshi, S. (2012). Impact of gender on consumer purchase behaviour. National Monthly Refereed Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 1(9), 1–8.
  6. Barbie. (2015, September 8). Imagine the possibilities. YouTube. Retrieved 05 March, 2025 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1vnsqbnAkk
  7. Beregovskaya, T. A., & Grishaeva, S. A. (2020). Generation Z: Consumer behavior in digital ecosystem. Vestnik Universiteta, 1, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-1-92-99
  8. Bhuwaneshwari, M., & Hemasuruthi, S. (2023). A study on social media influences on generation Z buying behaviour. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 3(3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-11413
  9. Burns, W. (2015, October 29). Mattel reframes The Barbie brand in new campaign targeting adults. Forbes. Retrieved 05 March, 2025 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/willburns/2015/10/29/mattel-reframes-the-barbie-brand-in-new-campaign-targeting-adults/
  10. Chetioui, Y., & El Bouzidi, L. (2023). An investigation of the nexus between online impulsive buying and cognitive dissonance among Gen Z shoppers: Are female shoppers different? Young Consumers, 24(4), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-06-2022-1548
  11. De Meulenaer, S., Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., & Eisend, M. (2018). How consumers’ values influence responses to male and female gender role stereotyping in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 37(6), 893–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1354657
  12. Dursun, İ., Alnıaçık, Ü., & Tümer Kabadayı, E. (2013). Tüketici karar verme tarzları ölçeği: Yapısı ve boyutları. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 9(19), 293–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.11122/ijmeb.2013.9.19.418
  13. Erden, A., Bilgili, A., Durmuş, B., & Çinko, M. (2025). Focusing area on advertising: An eye tracking application. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 18(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.1506664
  14. Eşel, E. (2005). Kadın ve erkek beyninin farklılıkları. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 15(3), 138–152.
  15. Espejo, L., Perez, N., Mendoza, C., & Gagarín, Y. (2024). A systematic review on unique characteristics of generation Z and their impact on purchasing decisions. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.4079
  16. Fathinasari, A. A., Purnomo, H., & Leksono, P. Y. (2023). Analsis of the study of digital marketing potential on product purchase decisions in generation Z. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v6i5.174
  17. Fink, B., Manning, J. T., & Neave, N. (2004). Second to fourth digit ratio and the ‘big five’ personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(3), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.018
  18. Fisher, A. D., & Cocchetti, C. (2020). Biological basis of gender identity. In The Plasticity of Sex (pp. 89–107). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815968-2.00009-8
  19. Garbarino, E., Slonim, R., & Sydnor, J. (2011). Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-010-9109-6
  20. Hess, A. C., & Melnyk, V. (2016). Pink or blue? The impact of gender cues on brand perceptions. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1550–1574. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1108/ EJM-11-2014-0723
  21. Hoag, H. (2008). Sex on the brain. New Scientist, 199(2665), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(08)61806-0
  22. Hughes, J. F., Skaletsky, H., Koutseva, N., Pyntikova, T., & Page, D. C. (2015). Sex chromosome-to-autosome transposition events counter Y-chromosome gene loss in mammals. Genome Biology, 16(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0667-4
  23. Hurd, P. L., & van Anders, S. M. (2007). Latitude, digit ratios, and Allen’s and Bergmann’s rules: A comment on Loehlin, McFadden, Medland, and Martin. Arch Sex Behaviour, 36, 139–141. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9149-9
  24. Jacobsen, S. L., & Bernes, N. G. (2020). Social media, gen Z and consumer misbehavior: Instagram made me do it. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 14(3), 51–58.
  25. Josse, G., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2004). Hemispheric specialization for language. Brain Research Reviews, 44(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.10.001
  26. Kaczmarski, M., Kubicka, A. M., Tryjanowski, P., & Hromada, M. (2015). Females have larger ratio of second‐to‐fourth digits than males in four species of Salamandridae, Caudata. The Anatomical Record, 298(8), 1424–1430. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23123
  27. Karaismailoğlu, S. (2019). Kadın beyni erkek beyni. Elma Yayınevi.
  28. Karaismailoğlu, S., & Erdem, A. (2013). The effects of prenatal sex steroid hormones on sexual differentiation of the brain. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation, 14, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2013.86836
  29. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  30. Kimura, D. (1996). Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influence human cognitive function—ScienceDirect. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 259–263.
  31. Li, Y., Li, Z., Liu, Y., & Teng, Y. (2015). The impact of women consumers’ psychology and behavior on marketing strategies: 2015-1st International Symposium on Social Science, Wuhang, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/isss-15.2015.75
  32. Lin, X., Featherman, M., Brooks, S. L., & Hajli, N. (2019). Exploring gender differences in online consumer purchase decision making: An online product presentation perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(5), 1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9831-1
  33. Lippa, R. A. (2006). Finger lengths, 2D:4D ratios, and their relation to gender-related personality traits and the Big Five. Biological Psychology, 71(1), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.02.004
  34. Lyons, A. C., Kersey, K., Emslie, C., Dimova, E., & Burrows, A. (2024). Digital alcohol marketing and gender: A narrative synthesis. Drug and Alcohol Review, 43(6), 1361–1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13849
  35. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13(11), 3000–3004. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000
  36. Manuel, R. (2024). Impact of gender-specific marketing on consumer purchasing behavior in Philippines. Journal of Conflict Management, 4(3), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.47604/jcm.2869
  37. Mehta, R. (2020). Gender-based differences in consumer decision-making styles: Implications for marketers. Decision, 47(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00252-8
  38. Millet, K., & Buehler, F. (2018). A context dependent interpretation of inconsistencies in 2D:4D findings: The moderating role of status relevance. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00254
  39. Mitchell, V., & Walsh, G. (2004). Gender differences in German consumer decision‐making styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.146
  40. Mulyani, R. A., & Chang, A. (2019). Understanding digital consumer: Generation Z online shopping prefences. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(2), 925–929. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1721.078219
  41. Mustafa, S., Sohail, M. T., Alroobaea, R., Rubaiee, S., Anas, A., Othman, A. M., & Nawaz, M. (2022). Éclaircissement to understand consumers’ decision-making psyche and gender effects, a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920594
  42. Naliboff, B. D., Berman, S., Chang, L., Derbyshire, S. W. G., Suyenobu, B., Vogt, B. A., Mandelkern, M., & Mayer, E. A. (2003). Sex-related differences in IBS patients: Central processing of visceral stimuli. Gastroenterology, 124(7), 1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00400-1
  43. Nelson, E. C., Manning, J. T., & Sinclair, A. G. (2006). Using the length of the 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) to sex cave art hand stencils: Factors to consider. Before Farming, 1, 1–7.
  44. Nelson, E., & Shultz, S. (2010). Finger length ratios (2D:4D) in anthropoids implicate reduced prenatal androgens in social bonding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 141(3), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21157
  45. Özöğretmen, T. (2018, February 6). Kadınlara özel Doritos hakkında açıklama. MediaCat. Retrieved 05 March, 2025 from https://mediacat.com/pepsicodan-lady-doritos-aciklamasi/
  46. Pastrana, N. A., Somerville, C., & Suggs, L. S. (2022). Integrating gender into social marketing programmes. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(11–12), 1072–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2071964
  47. Pawlikowska, K. (2011). Marketing addressed to women. Kobieta i Biznes, 1(4), 61–73.
  48. Petersson McIntyre, M. (2011). The gendered bottle: Meaning-making in luxury packaging. Conference Proceedings, 343–353.
  49. Petersson McIntyre, M. (2018). Gender by design performativity and consumer packaging. The Journal of Desing Studies Forum, 10(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1516437
  50. Polderman, T. J. C., Kreukels, B. P. C., Irwig, M. S., Beach, L., Chan, Y.-M., Derks, E. M., Esteva, I., Ehrenfeld, J., Heijer, M. D., Posthuma, D., Raynor, L., Tishelman, A., & Davis, L. K. (2018). The biological contributions to gender identity and gender diversity: Bringing data to the table. Behavior Genetics, 48(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-018-9889-z
  51. Rahman, M. T. (2019). Consumer decision making style - male versus female: A study on Chattogram City, Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v4i2.603
  52. Rahman, Q., Wilson, G. D., & Abrahams, S. (2004). Biosocial factors, sexual orientation and neurocognitive functioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(7), 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00154-9
  53. Raman, P. (2019). Understanding female consumers’ intention to shop online: The role of trust, convenience and customer service. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(4), 1138–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-10-2018-0396
  54. Reed, T. E., Vernon, P. A., & Jhonson, A. M. (2004). Sex difference in brain nerve conduction velocity in normal humans. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1709–1714. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.016
  55. Richards, G., Browne, W. V., Aydin, E., Constantinescu, M., Nave, G., Kim, M. S., & Watson, S. J. (2020). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH): Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Hormones and Behavior, 126, 104867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104867
  56. Roy, S. W. (2023). Did the creeping vole sex chromosomes evolve through a cascade of adaptive responses to a selfish x chromosome? BioEssays, 45(12), 2100164. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100164
  57. Schartl, M., & Lamatsch, D. K. (2023). How to manage without a Y chromosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(2), e2218839120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218839120
  58. Şentürk, E. E. (2023). The effects of consumer purchase decision-making styles on gift-giving behavior: An analyze on generations Y and Z. Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 8(1), 139–154.
  59. Şentürk, E. E., & Tarakçı, H. (2020). Alışverişte seni kim yönlendiriyor? Testosteron mu östrojen mi? Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, 10(4), 978–994. https://doi.org/10.14230/johut910
  60. Shi, H. (2024). Analysis on female consumerism in the she-economy and emotional value. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 60(1), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/60/20231211
  61. Slee, R., & Bownes, M. (1990). Sex determination in drosophila melanogaster. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 65(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/416718
  62. Sproles, G. B., & Kendall, E. L. (1986). A methodology for profiling consumers’ decision‐making styles. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 20(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1986.tb00382.x
  63. Stenstrom, E., Saad, G., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Mendenhall, Z. (2011). Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D:4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.003
  64. Sullivan, E. V., Rosenbloom, M., Serventi, K. L., & Pfefferbaum, A. (2004). Effects of age and sex on volumes of the thalamus, pons, and cortex. Neurobiology of Aging, 25(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00044-7
  65. Suvadarshini, A., & Rout, R. (2024). An empirical assessment of gender based influences on buying decision-making styles. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(4), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.04129
  66. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Fidell using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
  67. Thangavel, P., Pathak, P., & Chandra, B. (2022). Consumer decision-making style of gen Z: A generational cohort analysis. Global Business Review, 23(3), 710–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919880128
  68. Tor Kadıoğlu, C., & Bozyigit, S. (2025). The effect of celebrity endorsement on gender-based conspicuous consumption. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 27(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.70762
  69. Voracek, M. (2011). Special issue preamble: Digit ratio (2D:4D) and individual differences research. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.018
  70. Wade, T. J., Shanley, A., & Imm, M. (2004). Second to fourth digit ratios and individual differences in women’s self-perceived attractiveness, self-esteem, and body-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.005
  71. Wager, T. D., Phan, K. L., Liberzon, I., & Taylor, S. F. (2003). Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: A meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 19(3), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00078-8
  72. Webber, T. A., Soder, H. E., Potts, G. F., & Bornovalova, M. A. (2018). Preliminary evidence that digit length ratio (2D:4D) predicts neural response to delivery of motivational stimuli. Biol Psychol, 132, 91–95. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.11.008
  73. Wei, L. H., Kian Lam, T., & Mey, L. P. (2025). Tailoring the digital pitch: Gender-specific strategies for maximizing social media ad impact on purchase intention. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-07-2024-0405
  74. Weis, S. E., Firker, A., & Hennig, J. (2007). Associations between the second to fourth digit ratio and career interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.017
  75. Wiedmann, K.-P., Walsh, G., & Mitchell, V.-W. (2001). The Mannmaven: An agent for diffusing market information. Journal of Marketing Communications, 7(4), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260127413
  76. Wilhelm, D., & Bagheri-Fam, S. (2019). Genes and gene defects affecting gonadal development and sex determination. In Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases (pp. 695–703). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.95925-7
  77. Wolin, L. D. (2003). Gender Issues in advertising an oversight synthesis of research: 1970-2002. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-43-1-111-130
  78. Wu, H.-C., Ai, C.-H., & Xu, H. (2024). Exploring the drivers of pink-seeking intentions among women consumers. Journal of Marketing Communications, 30(7), 852–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2023.2183427
  79. Xie, Z., Page, L., & Hardy, B. (2017). Investigating gender differences under time pressure in financial risk taking. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00246
  80. Yang, C., & Wu, C. C. (2006). Gender differences in online shoppers’ decision-making styles. In J. Ascenso, L. Vasiu, C. Belo, & M. Saramago (Eds.), E-business and telecommunication networks (pp. 108–115). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4761-4_6
  81. Yang, C., & Wu, C.-C. (2007). Gender and internet consumers’ decision-making. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9988
  82. Yeniçeri, T., & Özal, H. (2016). Tüketici karar verme tarzlarının cinsiyet kimliğine göre incelenmesi. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(18), 135–168.
  83. Zawisza, M. (2019). Gendered advertising: Content, effectiveness and effects – psychological perspective. In S. Dobscha (Ed.), Handbook of Research on gender and marketing (pp. 8–27). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788115384.00006
  84. Zhang, H. (2024). The rise of her economy in the new media era: An innovative study of women’s consumption power and marketing strategies. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 90(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/90/20241957