SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3

RATIONALITY IN THE SHADOW OF EMOTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER REVIEWS ON CAT FOOD FROM A BEHAVIORAL FINANCE PERSPECTIVE

DUYGULARIN GÖLGESİNDE RASYONALİTE: KEDİ MAMALARINA İLİŞKİN TÜKETİCİ YORUMLARININ DAVRANIŞSAL FİNANS PERSPEKTİFİNDEN ANALİZİ

Hatice Ferek Bulut(İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6642-2503
Pages
738–769
Publication Date
2025-09-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that users attribute human characteristics to their cats and consider their emotions, preferences, and health conditions; in this context, emotional factors such as attachment, pursuit of happiness, and risk avoidance stand out in product evaluations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine online user reviews of cat food products within the framework of behavioral finance theory, revealing that consumer decisions are shaped not only by rational foundations but also by emotional tendencies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 600 user comments on the two most preferred cat food products on Trendyol, one of Turkey’s leading e-commerce platforms, were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis via MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2024 software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that users attribute human characteristics to their cats and consider their emotions, preferences, and health conditions; in this context, emotional factors such as attachment, pursuit of happiness, and risk avoidance stand out in product evaluations.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Davranışsal Finans · Elektronik Ağızdan Ağıza (E-WOM) Pazarlama · Çevrim İçi Müşteri Değerlendirmeleri

Abstract

This study aims to examine online user reviews of cat food products within the framework of behavioral finance theory, revealing that consumer decisions are shaped not only by rational foundations but also by emotional tendencies. A total of 600 user comments on the two most preferred cat food products on Trendyol, one of Turkey’s leading e-commerce platforms, were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis via MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2024 software. During the analysis process, five main themes—Anthropomorphism, Emotional Investment, Functional Evaluation, Protectiveness and Risk Perception, and Value Attribution—along with their respective subcodes, were developed based on the behavioral finance literature. The findings indicate that users attribute human characteristics to their cats and consider their emotions, preferences, and health conditions; in this context, emotional factors such as attachment, pursuit of happiness, and risk avoidance stand out in product evaluations. While measurable functional elements also play a role, emotional themes were found to be more dominant in the reviews. In this respect, the study analyzes online user-generated content (e-WOM) through a behavioral finance perspective and offers a theoretically meaningful contribution to this unique intersectional field focused on the emotional dimensions of consumer decision-making processes.

Özet

Bu çalışma, kedi maması ürünlerine yönelik çevrim içi kullanıcı yorumlarını davranışsal finans kuramı çerçevesinde analiz ederek, tüketici kararlarının yalnızca rasyonel temellere değil, aynı zamanda duygusal eğilimlere dayalı olarak şekillendiğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Türkiye’nin önde gelen e-ticaret platformlarından Trendyol’da en çok tercih edilen iki kedi mamasına ait toplam 600 kullanıcı yorumu, MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2024 yazılımı aracılığıyla yönlendirilmiş nitel içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Analiz sürecinde, davranışsal finans literatürüne dayanılarak geliştirilen beş ana tema (Antropomorfizm, Duygusal Yatırım, Fonksiyonel Değerlendirme, Koruyuculuk ve Risk Algısı, Değer Atfetme) ve bunlara bağlı alt kodlar kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, kullanıcıların kedilerine insanî özellikler atfederek onların duygularını, beğenilerini ve sağlık durumlarını dikkate aldıklarını; bu çerçevede aidiyet, mutluluk arayışı ve riskten kaçınma gibi duygusal faktörlerin ürün değerlendirmelerinde ön plana çıktığını göstermektedir. Ölçülebilir işlevsel unsurlar önemli bir yer tutsa da yorumlarda duygusal temaların daha baskın olduğu görülmüştür. Bu yönüyle çalışma, çevrim içi kullanıcı içeriklerini (e-WOM) davranışsal finans perspektifiyle analiz ederek, tüketici karar süreçlerinin duygusal boyutlarına odaklanan bu özgün kesişim alanına kuramsal düzeyde anlamlı bir katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bulut, H. F. (2025). RATIONALITY IN THE SHADOW OF EMOTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER REVIEWS ON CAT FOOD FROM A BEHAVIORAL FINANCE PERSPECTIVE. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 738–769. https://ajindex.com/articles/1301041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (79)

  1. Akgün, V. Ö., & Altay, H. C. (2024). E-Wom’un tekrar satın alma niyetine etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (54), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1476294
  2. Akgün, V. Ö., & Diktaş, M. (2017). Theoretical concept of hedonic consumption. Annals Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu, Letters & Social Science Series, 64.
  3. Aldhamiri, A., Carlson, J., Vilches-Montero, S., Rahman, S. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2024). What drives higher active customer engagement in luxury brands’ social media? Measurement and contingencies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103804, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103804
  4. Ali, S. M. S. (2025). Cognitive biases in digital decision making: How consumers navigate information overload (Consumer Behavior). Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 168-177.
  5. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value on JSTOR https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1086/209376
  6. Babić Rosario, A., De Valck, K., & Sotgiu, F. (2020). Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00706-1
  7. Bahar, R., & Villi, B. (2023). Hedonik tüketim ile gelişmeleri kaçırma korkusu (FOMO) arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Z kuşağı tüketiciler üzerine bir araştırma. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 13(1), 588–607. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1230186
  8. Balamoorthy, S., & Chandra, B. (2023). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors on e-WOM behaviour: The role of psychological impact during the time of COVID-19 crisis. Heliyon, 9(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13270
  9. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053-1128. DOI 10.3386/w9222
  10. Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035
  11. Bedeley, R. T., Hao, H., & Ghoshal, T. (2025). Cognitive biases in online opinion platforms: A review and mapping. SAGE Open, 15(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251315564
  12. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489522
  13. Bilgen Kocatürk, E. (2017). Algılanan kaliteye ilişkin literatür taraması ve algılanan kalitenin artırılmasına yönelik öneriler. İstanbul Journal of Social Sciences, 15(43), 42–66.
  14. Boya, U. O., Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2015). A comparison of dog food choice criteria across dog owner segments: an exploratory study. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12145
  15. Chaney, D., Lunardo, R., & Mencarelli, R. (2018). Consumption experience: Past, present and future. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 21(4), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-04-2018-0042
  16. Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008
  17. Chitturi, R. (2009). Emotions by design: A consumer perspective. International Journal of Design, 3(2),7-17.
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. (Çev: M. B. Demir) Siyasal Kitapevi, Ankara.
  19. Çetiner, M., Gökçek, H. A., & Gölbaşı, B. T. (2019). Davranışsal finans perspektifinden yatırımcı davranışları üzerine bir inceleme. Uluslararası Bankacılık Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 1–30.
  20. Dave, B. (2017). The role of emotions in consumer decision making: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 4(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM37988
  21. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718
  22. Dilek, H., & Çatı, K. (2023). Algılanan kalitenin satın alma niyetine etkisinin demografik özellikler ve marka tercihine göre incelenmesi. In 1st International Conference on Modern and Advanced Research (pp. 295–302). https://doi.org/10.59287/icmar.1298
  23. Duxbury, D. (2015). Behavioral finance: Insights from experiments II: Biases, moods and emotions. Review of Behavioral Finance, 7(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-09-2015-0037
  24. Engizek, N., & Şekerkaya, A. (2014). Lüks markalar ve taklitleri arasındaki ilişkinin teoriler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(2), 301-316.
  25. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
  26. Estrada, J. (2001). Law and behavioral economics. Paper presented at the Latin American Law and Economics Association Conference, Santiago, Chile, 1-17.
  27. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
  28. Farzin, M., Sadeghi, M., Fattahi, M., & Eghbal, M. R. (2022). Effect of social media marketing and eWOM on willingness to pay in the etailing: Mediating role of brand equity and brand identity. Business Perspectives and Research, 10(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337211024926
  29. Ferraro, R., Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2011). Our possessions, our selves: Domains of self-worth and the possession–self link. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 169–177. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.007
  30. Forbes, S. L., Trafford, S., & Surie, M. (2018). Pet humanisation: what is it and does it influence purchasing behaviour?. Journal of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences, 5(2), 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.19080/JDVS.2018.05.555659
  31. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209515
  32. Genç, E., Kurt, A. E., & Özer, A. (2025). Çevrim içi marka deneyimleri bağlamında tüketici ilhamının ve marka mutluluğunun satın alma niyetine etkisi. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(1), 105–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.15659/ppad.18.1.1589161
  33. Gilovich, T., Kumar, A., & Jampol, L. (2015). A wonderful life: Experiential consumption and the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 152–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.004
  34. Hansen, F. (1998). From lifestyle to value systems to simplicity. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 181–195.
  35. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
  36. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1251707
  37. Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. London: Routledge.
  38. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  39. Ismagilova, E., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). A meta-analysis of the factors affecting eWOM providing behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 1067-1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2018-0472
  40. Jacoby, J., & Chestnut, R. W. (1978). Brand loyalty: Measurement and management. New York: Wiley.
  41. Jalilvand, M. R., & Samiei, N. (2012). The impact of electronic word of mouth on a tourism destination choice: Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Internet Research, 22(5), 591–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662241211271563
  42. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  43. Kirk, C. P. (2019). Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers' psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets. Journal of Business Research, 99, 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.057
  44. Kliger, D., & Kudryavtsev, A. (2010). The availability heuristic and investors' reaction to company-specific events. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 11(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427561003591116
  45. Kukar-Kinney, M., Xia, L., & Monroe, K. B. (2007). Consumers’ perceptions of the fairness of price-matching refund policies. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 325–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.005
  46. Lastovicka, J. L., & Sirianni, N. J. (2011). Truly, madly, deeply: Consumers in the throes of material possession love. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 323–342. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1086/658338
  47. Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
  48. Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172830
  49. Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011
  50. Liu, Y., Chang, X., Yang, S., Li, Z., & Wu, Y. (2024). “Pets make you spend more!” Impact of pet ownership on consumer purchase decisions. Journal of Business Research, 183, 114838, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114838
  51. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
  52. Monroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 70-80. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/3149411
  53. Musnaini, M., Astuti, S. W., Sukoco, B. M., & Yacob, S. (2017). Effect of hedonic value and consumer knowledge on buying intention for luxury brand counterfeit products. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 19(4), 497–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2017.087297
  54. Muti Tabanlı, S. (2025). Tatminin ötesinde pazarlama: “Tüketici mutluluğu” kavramına yönelik bibliyometrik bir analiz. İşletme ve Girişimcilik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6, 62–78.
  55. Nny, W. T. W., Singh, J. S. K., & Choudhary, J. (2024). The impact of hedonic and utilitarian values, alongside psychological factors, on customer satisfaction and loyalty of female consumers. International Journal of Advanced Business Studies, 3, 73-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.59857/IJABS.3912
  56. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. 1988, 64(1), 12-40.
  57. Pauliuc, D. (2018). A study on the attachment in between owner and pet and its influence on the consumption of pet food. Master Thesis, International Business Scholl, Jonkoping University.
  58. Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022). The complexity of the human–animal bond: Empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism in human–animal relationships and animal hoarding. Animals, 12(20), 2835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202835
  59. Rani, A., & Shivaprasad, H. N. (2021). Revisiting the antecedent of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) during COVID-19 pandemic. Decision, 48(4), 419–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40622-021-00298-2
  60. Schleicher, M., Cash, S. B., & Freeman, L. M. (2019). Determinants of pet food purchasing decisions. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 60(6), 644–648.
  61. Shimul, A. S. (2022). Brand attachment: A review and future research. Journal of Brand Management, 29(4), 400–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41262-022-00279-5
  62. Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924
  63. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
  64. Srivastava, H., & Moid, S. (2025). Behavioral biases and individual investors’ investment decisions: Mediating role of financial risk tolerance. Quality & Quantity. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02352-y
  65. Statman, M. (2019). Behavioral finance: The second generation. CFA Institute Research Foundation.
  66. Suwandee, S., Surachartkumtonkun, J., & Lertwannawit, A. (2020). EWOM firestorm: Young consumers and online community. Young Consumers, 21(1), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2019-0982
  67. Şatır, C. (2023). Algılanan kalitenin marka bağlılığına etkisi ve marka güveninin aracılık rolü akıllı cihaz kullanıcıları üzerine bir araştırma (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  68. Şener, A., & Yücel, S. (2020). Sosyal medyanın Y kuşağı satın alma davranışları üzerindeki etkisi: Bir literatür incelemesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (65), 265–284.
  69. Taştan, M. (2025). Güvenin inşasında e-WOM’un rolü: Vegan kozmetik markaları üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Medialog TR, 4(1), 1–21.
  70. Tauber, E. M. (1972). Why do people shop? Journal of Marketing, 36(October), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250426
  71. Tekin, B. (2018). Bilişsel önyargı ve hevristik bağlamında finansın insani boyutu olarak davranışsal finans: Bir literatür incelemesi ve derleme çalışması. Uluslararası İnsan Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 131–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.35235/uicd.462794
  72. Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77–91. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10
  73. Urbina, D. A., & Ruiz‐Villaverde, A. (2019). A critical review of homo economicus from five approaches. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 63-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12258
  74. Üster, M. M. (2023). Davranışsal finansta anomaliler: Yatırımcı kararları ve Borsa İstanbul’da bir uygulama. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, 5(2), 118–128.
  75. Üstün, G. (2024). Davranışsal finans bağlamında yatırımcı kararlarının incelenmesi: Samsun örneği (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ordu Üniversitesi, Ordu.
  76. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1999(1), 1–15.
  77. Xinhui, C., & Han, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of consumer irrational purchase behavior based on Howard–Sheth model. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 10(3), 69-80.
  78. Yazdi, A., Ramachandran, S., Mohsenifard, H., Nawaser, K., Sasani, F., & Gharleghi, B. (2024). The ebb and flow of brand loyalty: A 28-year bibliometric and content analysis. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 45(1), 2303-2331
  79. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302