SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi / 2017 / Sayı: 48

The Perception of Abû Hanifah in Shiite Sources and the Accusations of Related to Abu Hanifa

Şiî-İmâmî Kaynaklarda Ebû Hanîfe Algısı ve Yöneltilen Suçlamalar

Hanifi ŞAHİN
Pages
119–140
Publication Date
2017-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our basic references will be al-Kutub al-Arbaa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abu Hanifah, even though, had a positive view of the Ahl al-Bayt, there is a strong opposition toAbu Hanifah in both the first period’s and the next period's Imamiyya sources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This contrast wouldresult in his damnation and described as nâsibî.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our basic references will be al-Kutub al-Arbaa.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ebu Hanife · Ashabulhadis · Ashaburrey

Abstract

Abu Hanifah, even though, had a positive view of the Ahl al-Bayt, there is a strong opposition toAbu Hanifah in both the first period’s and the next period's Imamiyya sources. This contrast wouldresult in his damnation and described as nâsibî. The basic reason for the criticism of Abu Hanifah isthat, he opened the mind to the understanding and interpretation of religion. In the Shiite sources,rhetoric is given to Abu Hanifah in the form of “If Ali judges, I will also judge”. With this narration,they are accusing Abu Hanifah being arbitrary and this idea should be vigilantly distracted from theImams accepted as the only authority in understanding religion. Rationalization in religious thoughtis to break from being connected with narrations and not to recognize an authority except the reason.This represents a very serious break with the view of Shi'i, that it was built his ontology on Imams.For this reason, the Shi'i wants to avoid not only Abu Hanifah's thoughts, but also the thought ofevery thought which will result in acting independently of Imams. The fact that the Shiites stay awayfrom the Ijtihad and Qiyas is also a result of this view. In this paper, we will look at the grounds andreasons for the criticism of Abu Hanifah in Shiite Imamiyya sources and we will try to examine itsconsequences in the Shi'a thought. Our basic references will be al-Kutub al-Arbaa.

Özet

Ebû Hanîfe’nin Ehl-i Beyt’e olumlu bakış açısı olmasına rağmen gerek ilk dönem gerekse sonraki

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, H. (2017). The Perception of Abû Hanifah in Shiite Sources and the Accusations of Related to Abu Hanifa. İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi, Sayı: 48, 119–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/130031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aclûnî, Ebü’l-Fidâ İsmail b. Muhammed. Keşfü’l-Hafâ ve Müzilü’l-İlbâs amma İştehere mine’l-Ehâdîs ala Elsineti’n-Nâs. thk. Abdülhamid Ahmed Yûsuf Hindâvî, Beyrut: el-Mektebetü’l-Asriyye, 2000.
  2. Ahmed b. Hanbel, Ebû Abdullah Ahmed b. Muhammed eş-Şeybânî. el-İlel ve Ma’rifetü’r-Rical. thk. Vasiyyullah b. Muhammed Abbas, Beyrut: el-Mektebü’l-İslâmî, 1988.
  3. Atalan, Mehmet. Şiîliğin Farklılaşma Sürecinde Ca’fer es-Sâdık’ın Yeri. Ankara: Araştırma Yay, 2005. el-Bâcî, Ebü’l-Velid Süleyman b. Halef b. Sa’d et-Tücibî. el-Müntekâ. Dârü’l-Kitabi’l-Arabi, Beyrut 1983. Buhârî, Ebû Abdillah Muhammed b. İsmail. et-Tarihu’s-Sağîr. thk. Mahmud İbrahim Zayed, Kahire: 1977.
  4. Çiftci, Adem. “İslam Ceza Hukukunda Suça Teşebbüsten Vazgeçme”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 19, sy. 1 (Haziran 2015): 23-46. Ebû Yusuf. er-Redd Ala Siyeri’l-Evzaı. Beyrut: t.y. Ebû Zehrâ, Muhammed. Ebû Hanîfe. trc. Osman Keskioğlu, Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2005. Ebü’l-Fidâ, İmadüddin el-Melikü’l-Müeyyed İsmail b. Ali. el-Muhtasar fî Ahbâri’l-Beşer, Kahire: Dârü’l-Ma’ârif, t.y. Hamidullah, Muhammed. İslam’da Devlet İdaresi. trc. Kemal Kuşçu, İstanbul: Ahmed Said Matbaası, 1963. Hatib el-Bağdâdî, Ebû Bekir Ahmed b. Ali. Târihu Bağdad. Kahire: 1931. Himyerî, Ebü’l-Abbâs Muhammed b. Abdullah b. Cafer. Kurbü’l-İsnad, Beyrut: Müessesetu Ali’l-Beyt, 1993.
  5. İbn Abdilberr, Ebû Ömer Cemaleddin Yusuf b. Abdullah b. Muhammed Kurtubi. Kitabü’l-İstignâ fi Ma’rifeti’l-Meşhûrîn min Hameleti’l-İlm bi’l-Künâ. thk. Abdullah Merhûl es-Sevâlime, Riyad: Dârü’l-Asıme, 2013.
  6. İbn Abdilberr, Ebû Ömer Cemaleddin Yusuf b. Abdullah b. Muhammed Kurtubi. el-İntikâ fî Fezaili’l-Eimmeti’s-Selaseti’l-Fukaha. thk. Abdülfettah Ebû Gudde, Beyrut: Dârü’l-Beşairi’l-İslâmiyye, 1997. İbn Ebî Şeybe, Abdullah b. Muhammed. Kitabu’l-Musannaf fi’l-Ehadîs ve’l-Asâr. Bombay: 1983. İbn Ebü’l-Avâm, Ebü’l-Kâsım Abdullah. Fedâilü Ebî Hanîfe: Ahbâruh ve Menâkıbuh.nşr. Latîfurrahmân el-Behrâicî el-Kâsımî, Mekke: 2010. İbn Hacer el-Heytemî, Şehibeddin Ahmed el-Mekkî. el-Hayrâtü’l-Hisân fî Menâkıbi’l-İmâmi’l-A’zam Ebî Hanîfe ün-Nu’mân, thk. Halil el-Meys, Suriye: 2007. İbn Hibbân, Muhammed b. Ahmed. Kitabu’l-Mecrûhîn. thk. Mahmud İbrahim Zayed, Mekke: t.y. İbn Kuteybe, Ebû Muhammed Abdullah b. Müslim ed-Dineverî. Te’vilu Muhtelefi’l-Hadis. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Ceyl, 1976.
  7. İbn Teymiye, Ahmed b. Abdilhalim. Mecmûi’l-Fetevâ. thk. Abdurrahman b. Muhammed, Ribat: Mektebetu’l-Mearif, 1981. İbn Şâzân, Ebü’l-Abbas Fazl b. Şâzân b. Hal