SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Benefiting from solar energy due to different emissivity levels of multiple glass windows for buildings

Binalarda farklı yayma oranlarına bağlı olarak çok camlı pencerelerden güneş enerjisinden yararlanma

Okan Kon(BALIKESIR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-5166-0258
İsmail Caner(BALIKESIR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0003-1232-649X
Pages
781–796
Publication Date
2022-07-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been calculated that in the fifth climatic zone in south direction, heat loss from windows with 0.05 emissivity can be provided with passive solar energy by 167.9% in double-glazed windows, 258.7% in triple-glazed windows and 349.1% in quadruple-glazed windows.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, firstly, heat transfer coefficients of windows were calculated according to the highest and lowest emissivity values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Secondly, monthly average solar radiation values were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been calculated that in the fifth climatic zone in south direction, heat loss from windows with 0.05 emissivity can be provided with passive solar energy by 167.9% in double-glazed windows, 258.7% in triple-glazed windows and 349.1% in quadruple-glazed windows.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yayma oranı · Pencerelerin ısı transfer katsayısı · Çoklu cam

Abstract

In the study, firstly, heat transfer coefficients of windows were calculated according to the highest and lowest emissivity values. Secondly, monthly average solar radiation values were determined. The heat transfer coefficient calculated for double, triple and quadruple glass windows. Thirdly, the solar radiation in the south, north and east/west directions of the five climatic zones were multiplied by the shading factor, surface area and the solar energy factor of discrete buildings. Thus, the solar energy gain value for the heating period and solar energy losses for cooling period was determined. Finally, passive solar energy gains are calculated during the heating and cooling period for all climate zones. It has been calculated that in the fifth climatic zone in south direction, heat loss from windows with 0.05 emissivity can be provided with passive solar energy by 167.9% in double-glazed windows, 258.7% in triple-glazed windows and 349.1% in quadruple-glazed windows.

Özet

Çalışmada öncelikle en yüksek ve en düşük yayma oranlarına göre pencerelerin ısı transfer katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. İkinci olarak aylık ortalama güneş ışınımı değerleri belirlenmiştir. İkili, üçlü ve dörtlü cam pencereler için ısı transfer katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Üçüncü olarak, beş iklim bölgesinin güney, kuzey ve doğu/batı yönündeki güneş radyasyonu, ayrı binaların gölgeleme faktörü, yüzey alanı ve güneş enerjisi faktörü ile çarpılmıştır. Böylece ısıtma periyodu için güneş enerjisi kazanç değeri ve soğutma periyodu için güneş enerjisi kayıpları belirlenmiştir. Son olarak, tüm iklim bölgeleri için ısıtma ve soğutma periyodu boyunca pasif güneş enerjisi kazanımları hesaplanmıştır. Güney yönünde beşinci iklim kuşağında 0.05 yayma oranına sahip pencerelerden ısı kaybının pasif güneş enerjisi ile çift camlı pencerelerde %167.9, üç camlı pencerelerde %258.7 ve dört camlı pencerelerde %349.1 sağlanabileceği hesaplanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kon, O., Caner, İ., *, İ. C. (2022). Benefiting from solar energy due to different emissivity levels of multiple glass windows for buildings. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 781–796. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1091332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. A. Kralj, M. Drev, M. Žnidaršic, B. Cerne, J. Hafner and B. P. Jelle, Investigations of 6-pane glazing: Properties and possibilities. Energy and Buildings, 190, 61–68, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.enbuild. 2019.02.033
  2. I. A. Gondal,, M. S. Athar and M. Khurram, Role of passive design and alternative energy in building energy optimization. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(2), 278-289, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X19887486
  3. T. P. Obrecht, M. Premrov and V. Ž. Leskovar, Influence of the orientation on the optimal glazing size for passive houses in different European climates (for non-cardinal directions). Solar Energy, 189, 15–25, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.037
  4. T. G. S. Lago, K. A. R. Ismail, F. A. M. Lino, Ventilated double glass window with reflective film: Modeling and assessment of performance. Solar Energy, 185, 72–88, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.047
  5. T. Andersona and M. Luther, Designing for thermal comfort near a glazed exterior wall. Architectural Science Review, 55, 3:186–195, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2012.697863
  6. M. J. Alam and M. A. Islam, Effect of outdoor shading and window glazing on energy consumption of buildings in Bangladesh. Advances in Building Energy Research, 11, 2:180–192, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2016.1190788
  7. M. Arıcı and M. Kan, An investigation of flow and conjugate heat transfer in multiple pane windows with respect to gap width, emissivity and gas filling. Renewable Energy 75:249-256, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.004
  8. H. Li, K. Zhong, J. Yu, Y. Kang and Z. Zhai (John) Z, Solar energy absorption effect of buildings in hot summer and cold winter climate zone China. Solar Energy 198:519–528, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.01.047
  9. J. Li, Q. Guan, H. Yang, Winter energy consumption in reading space of green library in cold regions. International Journal of Heat and Technology 36, 4:1256-1261, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.360413
  10. I. Udrea and V. Badescu, Usage of solar shading devices to improve the thermal comfort in summer in a Romanian PassivHaus. Simulation:Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International, 96, 5:471–486,2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549719887790
  11. Y. Zhu, X. Fan, C. Wang and G. Sang, Analysis of heat transfer and thermal environment in a rural residential building for addressing energy poverty. Applied Sciences, 8, 2077:1-13, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112077
  12. C. Liu, Y. Wu, D. Li, T. Ma, and X. Liu, Investigations on thermal and optical performances of a glazing roof with PCM layer. Internatıonal journal of energy research International Journal of Energy Resources, 41:2138–2148,2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3775
  13. Y. Suna, K. Shanks, H. Baig, W. Zhang, X. Hao, Y. Li, B. He, R. Wilson, H. Liu, S. Sundaram, J. Zhang, L. Xie, T. Mallick and Y. Wu, Integrated semi-transparent cadmium telluride photovoltaic glazing into windows: energy and daylight performance for different architecture designs. Applied Energy, 23:972–984, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.133
  14. C. Baglivo, P. M. Congedo, M. D. Cataldo, L. D. Coluccia and D. D’Agostino, Envelope design optimization by thermal modelling of a building in a warm climate. Energies, 10, 1808:1-34, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111808
  15. I. R. Maestre, J. L. F. Blázquez, F. J. G. Gallero and J. D. M. Baladé. Effect of,ky discretization for shading device calculation on building energy performance simulations. Energies 13, 138:1-14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061381
  16. R. Khakian, M. Karimimoshaver, F. Aram, S. Z. Benis, A. Mosavi and A. R. Varkonyi-Koczy, Modeling nearly zero energy buildings for sustainable development in rural areas. Energies 13, 2593:1-19, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102593
  17. G. Zhang, Z. Wang, D. Li, Y. Wu and M. Arıcı, Seasonal thermal performance analysis of glazed window filled with paraffin including various nanoparticles. International Journal of Energy Resources, 44:3008–3019, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/er.5129
  18. A. F. Altun and M. Kılıç, Influence of window parameters on the thermal performance of office rooms in different climate zones of Turkey. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 9:226-243, 2019.
  19. M. Košir, T. Gostiša and Ž. Kristl, Influence of architectural building envelope characteristics on energy performance in Central European climatic conditions. Journal of Building Engineering, 15,278–288, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.11.023
  20. T. Ashrafian and N. Moazzen, The impact of glazing ratio and window configuration on occupants’ comfort and energy demand: The case study of a school building in Eskisehir. Turkey. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47:101483:1-14, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101483
  21. Q. Xuan, G. Li, Y. Lu, B. Zhao, X. Zhao, Y. Su, J. Ji and G. Pei, Design, optimization and performance analysis of an asymmetric concentrator-PV type window for the building south wall application. Solar Energy, 193:422–433,2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.solener.2019.09.084
  22. A. Sedaghat, F. Alkhatib, S. A. A. Oloomi, F. Sabri, H. Salem, S. Mohammad, J. Z. Waqar, M. A. Malayer and A. Negahi, Experimental study on the performance of solar window films in office buildings in Kuwait. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 22, 85:1-17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-04789-8
  23. O. S. Asfour, Solar and shading potential of different configurations of building ıntegrated photovoltaics used as shading devices considering hot climatic conditions. Sustainability, 10,4373:1-15, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124373
  24. H. Manz and U. P. Menti, Energy performance of glazings in European climates. Renewable Energy, 37:226-232, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene. 2011.06.016
  25. J. E. Frederick, Energy transfer through single- and double-pane windows subject to winter time environmental radiation. Journal of Building Physics, 38, 3:214–233, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1744259113501628
  26. J. Karlsson J and A. Roos, Evaluation of window energy rating models for different houses and European climates. Solar Energy, 76:71–77, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2003.08.016
  27. S. S. Chandel and R. K. Aggarwal, Performance evaluation of a passive solar building in Western Himalayas. Renewable Energy, 33:2166–2173, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.01.008
  28. S. Lu, Z. Li, Q. Zhao and F. Jiang, Modified calculation of solar heat gain coefficient in glazing façade buildings. Energy Procedia, 122, 151-156, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.335
  29. T. Kaasalainen, A. Makinen, T. Lehtinen, M. Moisio, J. Vinha, Architectural window design and energy efficiency: Impacts on heating, cooling and lighting needs in Finnish climates. Journal of Building Engineering, 27,100996:1-14, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100996
  30. S. Jaber and S. Ajib, Thermal and economic windows design for different climate zones. Energy and Buildings, 43:3208–3215, 2011. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.08.019
  31. J. S. Carlos and H. Corvacho, Evaluation of the thermal performance indices of a ventilated double window through experimental and analytical procedures: Uw-values. Renewable Energy, 63:747-754, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013. 10.031
  32. H. Karabay and M. Arıcı, Multiple pane window applications in various climatic regions of Turkey. Energy and Buildings, 45:67-71, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.020
  33. O. Kon, Farklı yayıcılığa sahip iki, üç ve dört camlı pencerelere bağlı yakıt tüketimi. 1st International Conference on Advances in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering (ICAMMEN 2018), Ankara/Turkey 8-9 November 2018.
  34. F. Al-Sibai, B. Hillemacher, M. Burghold and R. Kneer, Untersuchung zur dämmwirkung von wärmedämm-materialien mit ınfrarot reflektierenden oberflächen. Bauphysik, 35, 4, 225-234, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/bapi.201310071
  35. O. Kon, Calculation of fuel consumption and emissions in buildings based on outdoor walls and windows using economic optimization. Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 33, 1:101-113, 2018. https://doi.org/ 10.17341/gazimmfd.406783
  36. H. Kitagawa, T. Asawa, T. Kubota, A. R. Trihamdani, K. Sakurada and H. Mori, Optimization of window design for ventilative cooling with radiant floor cooling systems in the hot and humid climate of Indonesia. Building and Environment, 188, 107483:1-13, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv. 2020.107483
  37. D. Hu and Y. Gu, A membrane reflector, polymer hybrid infrared emitter for better radiative cooling performance. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 234,111417:1-8, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.solmat.2021.111417
  38. A. Heydari, S. E. Sadati and M. R. Gharib, Effects of different window configurations on energy consumption in building: Optimization and economic analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 35,102099:1-11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jobe.2020.102099
  39. L. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Xu and L. Dong, Optimization method for prefabricated restroom envelope energy saving characteristics in hot summer and cold winter zone. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 39,3:944–961, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987 21993934
  40. A. M. Raimundo, N. B. Saraiva, L. Dias Pereira and A. C. Rebelo, Market-Oriented cost-effectiveness and energy analysis of windows in Portugal. Energies, 14, 3720:1-19, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133720
  41. Y. Shi, X. Xi, Y. Zhang, H. Xu, J. Zhang and R. Zhang, Prediction and analysis of the thermal performance of composite vacuum glazing. Energies, 14,5769:1-15, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en 14185769
  42. Z. Wang, Q. Tian and J. Jia, Numerical study on performance optimization of an energy-saving insulated window. Sustainability, 13, 935:1-25, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020935
  43. Turkish Standard, TS 825, Thermal insulation requirements for buildings. December 2013.
  44. Turkish Standard, TS 2164, principles for the preparation of the projects of the central heating systems. 2000.
  45. Çengel Y. Isı ve Kütle Transferi Pratik bir Yaklaşım. Güven Kitabevi, İzmir-Türkiye, 2011.