SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Effect of different loading rates on biohydrogen production from apple pulp

Elma posasından biyohidrojen üretimine farklı yükleme oranlarının etkisi

Furkan Baş(NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1312-6871
Hamdi Muratçobanoğlu(NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4720-8090
Öznur Begüm Gökçek(NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1730-2905
Sevgi Demirel(NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5329-591X
Pages
82–87
Publication Date
2023-01-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the microbial distribution results are examined, it is seen that Lactobacillus, Clostridium and Lachnospiraceae are the most dominant species.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Global environmental problems and the increasing energy demand of the modern world have revealed the search for alternative and renewable energy sources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Biohydrogen yields obtained from batch reactors at different substrate/inoculum (S/I) ratios were compared after physical pretreatment on inoculum (90°C-30 min).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the microbial distribution results are examined, it is seen that Lactobacillus, Clostridium and Lachnospiraceae are the most dominant species.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyohidrojen · elma posası · karanlık fermantasyon

Abstract

Global environmental problems and the increasing energy demand of the modern world have revealed the search for alternative and renewable energy sources. Hydrogen is one of these sources and has advantages such as having high energy content, being an energy carrier and being environmentally friendly. Hydrogen production processes can be lined as electrochemical methods, thermal methods, and biological hydrogen production. Among these methods, biological methods come to the fore because they are more economical and sustainable. In this study, biohydrogen production from apple pulp by dark fermentation method, which is a biological process, was investigated. Biohydrogen yields obtained from batch reactors at different substrate/inoculum (S/I) ratios were compared after physical pretreatment on inoculum (90°C-30 min). S/I 2 was the best performance yielded for per volatile solid (VS) 208 ml/gVS biogas and 18 mlH2/gVS biohydrogen production. When the microbial distribution results are examined, it is seen that Lactobacillus, Clostridium and Lachnospiraceae are the most dominant species.

Özet

Küresel çevre problemleri ve modern dünyanın artan enerji talebi alternatif ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları arayışını ortaya çıkarmıştır. Alternatif enerji kaynaklarının başında ise yüksek enerji içeriğine sahip olması, enerji taşıyıcısı olması ve çevre dostu olması gibi avantajları nedeniyle hidrojen gelmektedir. Hidrojen üretim prosesleri; elektrokimyasal yöntemler, termal yöntemler ve biyolojik hidrojen üretimi olarak sıralanabilir. Bu yöntemler arasında daha sürdürülebilir olması nedeniyle biyolojik yöntemler ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, biyolojik bir proses olan karanlık fermantasyon yöntemi ile elma posasından biyohidrojen üretimi incelenmiştir. Elma posası kullanılarak, aşı çamuruna uygulanan fiziksel ön işlem (90°C- 30 dk) sonrası farklı substrat/aşı (S/I) yükleme oranlarında kesikli reaktörlerden elde edilen biyohidrojen verimleri karşılaştırılmıştır. En iyi performansı gösteren S/I 2 yükleme koşullarında uçucu katı başına (UK) 208 ml/gUK biyogaz ve 18 mlH2/gUK biyohidrojen üretimi gerçekleşmiştir. Mikrobiyal dağılım sonuçları incelendiğinde Lactobacillus, Clostridium ve Lachnospiraceae türlerinin en baskın türler olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Baş, F., Muratçobanoğlu, H., Gökçek, Ö. B., Demirel, S. (2023). Effect of different loading rates on biohydrogen production from apple pulp. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1133871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. R. Haron, R. Mat, T. Abdullah, and R. Rahman, Overview on utilization of biodiesel by-product for biohydrogen production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 314-324, 2018. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.160
  2. M. Ali, Q. Shafique, D. Kumar, S. Kumar and S. Kumar, Energy and exergy analysis of a 747-MW combined cycle power plant Guddu, International Journal of Ambient Energy, 41(13), 1495-1504, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1517680
  3. J. Ratnasingam, G. Ramasamy, F. Ioras and N. Parasuraman, Assessment of the carbon footprint of rubberwood sawmilling in peninsular Malaysia: Challenging the green label of the material, BioResources, 12(2), 3490-3503, 2017. https://doi.org/ 10.15376/biores.12.2.3490-3503
  4. B. Hüner, N. Demir and M.F. Kaya, Electrodeposition of NiCu bimetal on 3D printed electrodes for hydrogen evolution reactions in alkaline media, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(24), 12136-12146, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.009
  5. S. F. Ahmed, N. Rafa, M. Mofijur, I.A. Badruddin, A. Inayat, M.S. Ali and T.M. Yunus Khan, Biohydrogen production from biomass sources: metabolic pathways and economic analysis, Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 753878, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg. 2021.753878
  6. G. Balachandar, N. Khanna and D. Das, Biohydrogen production from organic wastes by dark fermentation, In Biohydrogen (pp. 103-144), 2013. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-444-59555-3.00006-4
  7. L. Zhao, Z. Wang, H.Y. Ren, C. Chen, J. Nan, G. L. Cao, and N. Q. Ren, Residue cornstalk derived biochar promotes direct bio-hydrogen production from anaerobic fermentation of cornstalk, Bioresource Technology, 320, 124338, 2021. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124338
  8. G. Kumar, T. Mathimani, E.R. Rene, and A. Pugazhendhi, Application of nanotechnology in dark fermentation for enhanced biohydrogen production using inorganic nanoparticles, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(26), 13106-13113, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.131
  9. H. Singh, S. Rout, and D. Das, Dark fermentative biohydrogen production using pretreated Scenedesmus obliquus biomass under an integrated paradigm of biorefinery, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(1), 102-116, 2022. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.018
  10. D. Cheng, H. H. Ngo, W. Guo, S. W Chang, D. D. Nguyen, L. Deng, L and N. B. Hoang, Advanced strategies for enhancing dark fermentative biohydrogen production from biowaste towards sustainable environment, Bioresource Technology, 127045, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127045
  11. L. Rosa and M. Mazzotti, Potential for hydrogen production from sustainable biomass with carbon capture and storage, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 157, 112123, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112123
  12. Statista, Apple production worldwide, https://www.statista.com/statistics/961248/production-of-apples-worldwide/ Erişim tarihi: 17.09.2021.
  13. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Turkey: Fresh Deciduous Fruit Annual, https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/turkey-fresh-deciduous-fruit-annual-5. Erişim tarihi: 17.09.2021
  14. J. R. Banu, J. Merrylin, T. M. Usman, R. Y. Kannah, M. Gunasekaran, S. H. Kim and G. Kumar, Impact of pretreatment on food waste for biohydrogen production: a review, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(36), 18211-18225, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.176
  15. Y. Yin, J. Hu and J. Wang, Enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge by different pretreatment methods, International journal of hydrogen energy, 39(25), 13550-13556, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.145
  16. R. Ali, F. Saravia, A. Hille-Reichel, J. Gescher and H. Horn, Propionic acid production from food waste in batch reactors: Effect of pH, types of inoculums, and thermal pre-treatment, Bioresource technology, 319, 124166, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020. 124166
  17. D. R. S. Lima, O. F. H. Adarme, B. E. L. Baêta, L. V. A. Gurgel and de S. F. Aquino, Influence of different thermal pretreatments and inoculum selection on the biomethanation of sugarcane bagasse by solid-state anaerobic digestion: a kinetic analysis, Industrial Crops and Products, 111, 684-693, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.11.048
  18. T. N. B. Dung, C. H. Lay, D. D. Nguyen, S. W. Chang, J. R. Banu, Y. Hong and J. H. Park, Improving the biohydrogen production potential of macroalgal biomass through mild acid dispersion pretreatment, Fuel, 332, 125895, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.fuel.2022.125895
  19. Y. Wong, T. Wu, J. Juan, A Review of Sustainable Hydrogen Production Using Seed Sludge Via Dark Fermentation, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 471-482, 2014. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.008
  20. P. Mishra, F. Ameen, R. M. Zaid, L. Singh, Z. Ab Wahid, M. A. Islam and S. Al Nadhari, Relative effectiveness of substrate-inoculum ratio and initial pH on hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent: kinetics and statistical optimization, Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 276-283, 2019. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.317
  21. S. Srikanth and S. V. Mohan, Regulating feedback inhibition caused by the accumulated acid intermediates during acidogenic hydrogen production through feed replacement, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(19), 10028-10040, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.152
  22. L. Ge, J. Qi, B. Shao, Z. Ruan, Y. Ren, S. Sui and W. Song, Microbial hydrogen economy alleviates colitis by reprogramming colonocyte metabolism and reinforcing intestinal barrier, Gut Microbes, 14(1), 2013764, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976. 2021.2013764
  23. A. Sikora, M. Błaszczyk, M. Jurkowski and U. Zielenkiewicz, Lactic acid bacteria in hydrogen-producing consortia: on purpose or by coincidence? INTECH open science open minds, 488-514, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50364
  24. R. C. da Silva Mazareli, A. C. Villa-Montoya, T. P. Delforno, V. B. Centurion, V. M. de Oliveira,E. L. Silva, and M. B. A. Varesche, Metagenomic analysis of autochthonous microbial biomass from banana waste: Screening design of factors that affect hydrogen production, Biomass and bioenergy, 138, 105573, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105573
  25. A. C. V. Montoya, R. C. da Silva Mazareli, T. P. Delforno, V. B. Centurion, V. M. de Oliveira, E. L. Silva, and M. B. A. Varesche, Optimization of key factors affecting hydrogen production from coffee waste using factorial design and metagenomic analysis of the microbial community, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(7), 4205-4222, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.062
  26. M. Pérez-Rangel, J. E. Barboza-Corona, M. Navarro-Díaz, A. E. Escalante and I. Valdez-Vazquez, The duo Clostridium and Lactobacillus linked to hydrogen production from a lignocellulosic substrate, Water Science and Technology, 83(12), 3033-304, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.186
  27. W. Cieciura, S. Borowski, A. Otlewska, Biohydrogen production from fruit and vegetable waste, sugar beet pulp and corn silage via dark fermentation, Renew Energy 153:1226–1237, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.renene.2020.02.085
  28. A. H. Salem, R. Brunstermann, T. Mietzel, Effect of pretreatment and hydraulic retention time on biohydrogen production from organic wastes, Int Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1–10, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.114
  29. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Turkey: Fresh Deciduous Fruit Annual, https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/turkey-fresh-deciduous-fruit-annual-5. Erişim tarihi: 17.09.2021