Journals / Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Single and Double Soft Anchor Fixation in Arthroscopic Treatment of Anterior Bankart Lesions

Fatih İlker Can(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5880-5336
Emre Gültaç(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1943-2199
Burak Şener(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5998-5807
Rodi Ertoğrul(İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6977-8262
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients with limited anterior Bankart lesions, arthroscopic repair using a single soft anchor provides clinical, functional, and stability outcomes comparable to those achieved with double soft anchor fixation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, functional, and stability outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair performed using either a single or double soft anchor in patients with limited anterior Bankart lesions between the 1 and 5 o’clock positions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our retrospective cohort included patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability between January 2018 and December 2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients with limited anterior Bankart lesions, arthroscopic repair using a single soft anchor provides clinical, functional, and stability outcomes comparable to those achieved with double soft anchor fixation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Arthroscopic Bankart repair · Labrum · Soft anchor

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, functional, and stability outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair performed using either a single or double soft anchor in patients with limited anterior Bankart lesions between the 1 and 5 o’clock positions. Our retrospective cohort included patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability between January 2018 and December 2023. Glenoid defects or other associated shoulder pathologies were excluded, and all patients had a minimum two years follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: single soft anchor (n=36) and double soft anchor (n=26). Demographic data, recurrent subluxation/ dislocation, necessity of revision surgery, pain scala, functional outcomes, patient satisfaction rates, and return to sports rates were assessed at the second postoperative year. The mean age was 29.5 ± 7.7 years in the single soft anchor group and 28.0 ± 5.9 years in the double soft anchor group. Recurrent dislocation was observed in three patients in the single soft anchor group, whereas no recurrent dislocation occurred in the double soft anchor group, showing no statistically significant difference between the groups. Pain and functional outcomes were similar between groups at year two, and no statistically significant differences were observed regarding patient satisfaction or return to sports. In patients with limited anterior Bankart lesions, arthroscopic repair using a single soft anchor provides clinical, functional, and stability outcomes comparable to those achieved with double soft anchor fixation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, saat 1–5 kadranları arasında sınırlı olan anterior Bankart lezyonu bulunan hastalarda tek veya çift soft ankor kullanılarak yapılan artroskopik Bankart onarımının klinik, fonksiyonel ve stabilite sonuçlarını karşılaştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya, Ocak 2018 ile Aralık 2023 tarihleri arasında anterior omuz instabilitesi nedeniyle artroskopik Bankart onarımı uygulanan hastalar dahil edildi. Glenoid kemik defekti bulunan veya eşlik eden omuz patolojileri olan hastalar çalışmadan dışlandı ve tüm hastaların en az iki yıllık takip süresi mevcuttu. Kullanılan soft ankor sayısına göre hastalar tek soft ankor (n=36) ve çift soft ankor (n=26) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Demografik veriler, tekrar çıkık gelişimi, revizyon cerrahisi gereksinimi, ağrı düzeyi, fonksiyonel sonuçlar, hasta memnuniyeti ve spora dönüş durumu ameliyat sonrası ikinci yıl kontrollerinde değerlendirildi. Ortalama yaş Grup 1‘de 29.5 ± 7.7 yıl, Grup 2‘de ise 28.03 ± 5.9 yıl idi. Tekrar çıkık, tek soft ankor grubunda üç hastada görülürken, çift soft ankor grubunda tekrar çıkık izlenmedi ve gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Ameliyat sonrası ikinci yıldaki ağrı ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı fark bulunmadı; hasta memnuniyeti ve spora dönüş oranları da benzerdi. 1-5 kadranda sınırlı anterior Bankart lezyonlu hastalarda,uygulanan artroskopik onarımda tek ve çift soft ankor kullanımının benzer klinik, fonksiyonel ve stabilite sonuçları sağladığı gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Can, F. İ., Gültaç, E., Şener, B., Ertoğrul, R. (2026). Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Single and Double Soft Anchor Fixation in Arthroscopic Treatment of Anterior Bankart Lesions. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.47572/muskutd.1880251

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hendawi T, Milchteim C, Ostrander R. Bankart repair using modern arthroscopic technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(3).
  2. DeFroda S, Bokshan S, Stern E, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the management of anterior shoulder instability: indications and outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4):442-51.
  3. Murphy AI, Hurley ET, Hurley DJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of the arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(11):2084-9.
  4. Pearce SS, Horan MP, Rakowski DR, et al. Knotless all-suture, soft anchor Bankart repair results in excellent patient-reported outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and acceptable recurrent instability rates at minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2023;39(8):1793-9.
  5. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):347-52.
  6. Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8):1755-63.
  7. Kennedy MI, Murphy C, Dornan GJ, et al. Variability of reporting recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair: a call for a standardized study design. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(5):2325967119846915.
  8. Olds M, Ellis R, Donaldson K, et al. Risk factors which predispose first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations to recurrent instability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(14):913-22.
  9. Asiri FAM, Alqhtani AA, Assiri AH, et al. Systematic review of arthroscopic Bankart repair outcomes for anterior shoulder instability. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30.
  10. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Richards DP. Sutures and suture anchors: update 2003. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(9):985-90.
  11. Lacheta L, Dekker TJ, Anderson N, et al. Arthroscopic knotless, tensionable all-suture anchor Bankart repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2019;8(6).
  12. Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):407-14.
  13. Mazzocca AD, Brown FM Jr, Carreira DS, et al. Arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization of collision and contact athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(1):52-60.
  14. Buckup J, Welsch F, Petchennik S, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart repair: how many knotless anchors do we need for anatomic reconstruction of the shoulder? A prospective randomized controlled study. Int Orthop. 2023;47(5):1285-93.