Journals / Middle East Journal of Science / 2020 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

COMPARATIVE ASSESMENT OF DOSE CALIBRATORS USED IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Merve Cinoğlu Karaca(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL OKMEYDANI HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-5659-2792
Duygu Tunçman Genç(Altınbas University Vocational School at Healty Services Medical İmaging Techniques Department)0000-0002-0929-0441
Hatice Kovan(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL OKMEYDANI HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0001-6589-0583
Mehmet Mülazımoğlu(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, İSTANBUL OKMEYDANI HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-7107-0386
Bayram Demir(İstanbul University Faculty of Science)0000-0001-6815-6384
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Calibration certificate of the ATOM LAB 400 calibrator has been updated in accordance with NRC protocol.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dose calibrators are used to measure the amount of radioactive to be given to the patient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:ATOM LAB 400 (serial number:11070208 ) and 500 (serial number: 15091215) dose calibrators which are actively used in our clinic were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Calibration certificate of the ATOM LAB 400 calibrator has been updated in accordance with NRC protocol.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nuclear Medicine · Dose Calibrator

Abstract

Dose calibrators are used to measure the amount of radioactive to be given to the patient. It is necessary to determine the correct dose and measure the amount of radioactive material with the least possible error. To minimize these potential errors, quality control (QA) tests should be carried out periodically according to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Authority (NRC). ATOM LAB 400 (serial number:11070208 ) and 500 (serial number: 15091215) dose calibrators which are actively used in our clinic were used. Our aim is to verify the accuracy of the dose calibrator which needs to be updated by using a recently calibrated dose calibrator. QA tests were performed on both dose calibrators. Test results of the currently certified dose calibrator and ATOM LAB 400 dose calibrator whose certificate will be updated were found to be compatible with each other.The tests performed on both dose calibrators remained with the error limits. Calibration certificate of the ATOM LAB 400 calibrator has been updated in accordance with NRC protocol.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaca, M. C., Genç, D. T., Kovan, H., Mülazımoğlu, M., Demir, B. (2020). COMPARATIVE ASSESMENT OF DOSE CALIBRATORS USED IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Middle East Journal of Science, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1293700

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Demir B., Kaplan A. et al., "Production cross–section calculations of medical 32p, 117sn, 153sm And 186,188re radionuclides used In Bone Pain Palliation Treatment," KERNTECHNIK, 80, 58-65, 2015.
  2. Alameen S., Bdelfatah AM. et.al., “Assessment of Dose Calibrators Performance in Nuclear Medicine Department in Sudan”, Sch. Acad. J. Pharm., 5, 245-250,2016.
  3. Dale JW., “A beta-gamma ionization chamber for substandards of radioactivity-11. Instrument response to gamma radiation”, Int J Appl Radiat., 10, 72-78, 1961.
  4. Kowalsky RJ., Jonston RE. et al.,” Dose Calibrator Performance and Quality Control” J. Nucl. Med. Technol., 5, 35-40,1977.
  5. Tunçman Genç D., Poyraz L. et al., “Nükleer tıpta kullanılan doz kalibratörlerinin kalite kontrol testleri”, FNG & Demiroğlu Bilim Tıp Dergisi,5, 8-14,2019.
  6. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Code of Federal Regulations. Title 10, Part 35, Washington D.C.,April 1987, Updated January 24, 2018.
  7. Zanzonico P., “Routine quality control of clinical nuclear medicine instrumentation: a brief review”., J Nucl Med,49,1114-31,2008
  8. Özkırlı M., Bor D. et al., “Doz kalibratörlerinin performans özelliklerinin kıyaslanması”, TJNM,4,143-8,1995.
  9. Cho SG., Kim J. et al., “Radiation Safety in Nuclear Medicine Procedures”, Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 51, 11–16,2017.
  10. Koç K., “Nükleer Tıp merkezlerinde kullanılan radyoizotop kalibratörlerinde kalite sağlanması üzerine bir araştırma-lineerite testi”, Politeknik; 21,507-11,2018.
  11. Mohammed AYA., Mudthir MHO. et al., “Assessment of 99mTc Dose Calibrator Performance in Nuclear Medicine Department”, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 11,36-39,2014.
  12. Alameen S., Bdelfatah AM. et al., “Assessment of Dose Calibrators Performance in Nuclear Medicine Department in Sudan”, Sch. Acad. J. Pharm., 5,245-250,2016.
  13. Tunçman Genç D., Poyraz L. et al., “Nükleer tıpta kullanılan doz kalibratörlerinin kalite kontrol testleri”, FNG & Demiroğlu Bilim Tıp Dergisi,5, 8-14,2019.
  14. Özkırlı M., Bor D. et al., “Doz kalibratörlerinin performans özelliklerinin kıyaslanması”, TJNM,4,143-8,1995.