SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Global Reproductive Coercion

Küresel Olarak Üreme Baskısı

Hava Özkan(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7314-0934
Elif Erdoğan(ATATURK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES)0000-0003-4186-4369
Serap Ejder Apay(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0978-1993
Pages
463–470
Publication Date
2025-05-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it aims to provide guidance on how healthcare providers can better serve this population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reproductive coercion is any interference with a person’s reproductive autonomy, whether to conceive, when to conceive, and whether to continue a pregnancy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It includes sabotage of contraceptive methods, intimate partner violence, and peer pressures to reproduce.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it aims to provide guidance on how healthcare providers can better serve this population.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Doğum kontrol · koersiyon · sabotaj

Abstract

Reproductive coercion is any interference with a person’s reproductive autonomy, whether to conceive, when to conceive, and whether to continue a pregnancy. It includes sabotage of contraceptive methods, intimate partner violence, and peer pressures to reproduce. This can hinder women’s access to healthcare. The purpose of this review is to comprehensively address the various dimensions of reproductive coercion and to evaluate possible approaches to solving this problem. Generally, experiences of domestic violence may coincide with reproductive coercion. Although the literature explaining the pathology of reproductive coercion is limited, increasing data regarding the harm done to reproductive choices, health outcomes, and future pregnancies indicates that more awareness and education are needed. This review investigates the current knowledge on reproductive coercion and highlights future research areas. Additionally, it aims to provide guidance on how healthcare providers can better serve this population.

Özet

Üreme baskısı, kişinin üreme özerkliğine, gebe kalıp kalmayacağına, ne zaman gebe kalacağına ve gebeliği devam ettirip ettirmeyeceğine yönelik herhangi bir müdahaledir. Doğum kontrol yöntemlerinin sabote edilmesini, yakın partner şiddetini ve üremeye yönelik çevre baskılarını içermektedir. Bu durum, kadının sağlık hizmetlerine erişimini engelleyebilir. Bu derlemenin amacı, üreme baskısının çeşitli boyutlarını kapsamlı bir şekilde ele almak ve bu sorunun çözümüne yönelik olası yaklaşımları değerlendirmektir. Genel olarak, aile içi şiddet deneyimi ile üreme baskısı bir arada ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Her ne kadar üreme baskısının patolojisini açıklayan literatür sınırlı olsa da, üreme tercihlerine, sağlık sonuçlarına ve gelecekteki gebeliklere verilen zararlara ilişkin artan veriler, daha fazla tanıtım ve bilgilendirme yapılması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir. Bu derleme, üreme baskısına ilişkin mevcut bilgileri araştırmakta ve gelecekteki çalışma alanlarını vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca kadın sağlığı hizmeti sağlayıcılarının, bu nüfusa nasıl daha iyi hizmet verebilecekleri konusunda yol gösterici olmayı hedeflemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, H., Erdoğan, E., Apay, S. E. (2025). Global Reproductive Coercion. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1635263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Miller E, et al. Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(4):316-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004
  2. Miller E, et al. Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients. Contraception. 2014;89(2):122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.011
  3. Fasula AM, et al. Multiple psychosocial health problems and sexual risk among African American females in juvenile detention: A cross-sectional study. Children and Youth Services Review. 2018;88:74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.041
  4. Paterno MT, et al. Exploring reproductive coercion in relationship contexts among young adult, primarily African American women at three women’s health clinics. Journal of interpersonal violence.2021;36(3-4):NP2248-2271NP. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518756116
  5. Clark LE, et al. Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):42.e41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.019
  6. Rosenfeld EA, et al. Male partner reproductive coercion among women veterans. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018;218(2):239e231-239e238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.015
  7. Basile KC, et al. National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. 2011. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11637
  8. Holliday CN, et al. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Women's Experiences of Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017;26(8):828-835. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.5996
  9. Bagwell-Gray ME, et al. Women's Reproductive Coercion and Pregnancy Avoidance: Associations With Homicide Risk, Sexual Violence, and Religious Abuse. Violence Against Women. 2021;27(12-13):2294-2312. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211005566
  10. Grace KT, & Miller E. Future directions for reproductive coercion and abuse research. Reprod Health. 2023;20(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01550-3
  11. Cha S, et al. Couple pregnancy intentions and induced abortions in the United States. International Journal of Women's Health and Reproduction Sciences. 2016;4(4):157-163. https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2016.36
  12. Wallenborn JT, et al. Discordance in couples pregnancy intentions and breastfeeding duration: Results from the National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2013. Journal of Pregnancy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8568341
  13. Liu F, et al. Perceived Fertility Control and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Abused Women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016;45(4):592-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.01.004
  14. Öztürk R, & Güner Ö. Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Reproductive Coercion Scale. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2021;15(1):100-109. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.810973
  15. Bryant AS, et al. Race/Ethnicity and pregnancy decision making: the role of fatalism and subjective social standing. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(6):1195-1200. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1623
  16. Grace KT, et al. Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy Among Latina Women. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(3-4):1604-1636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520922363
  17. Wright RL, et al. Predictors of Reproductive Autonomy among a Rural University Population. Health Soc Work. 2018;43(4):235-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hly027
  18. Gentry J, & Bailey BA. Psychological intimate partner violence during pregnancy and birth outcomes: threat of violence versus other verbal and emotional abuse. Violence Vict. 2014;29(3):383-392. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00020
  19. Jones KA, et al. Abusive Experiences and Young Women's Sexual Health Outcomes: Is Condom Negotiation Self-Efficacy a Mediator? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(2):57-64. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8616
  20. McCauley HL, et al. Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale. Contraception. 2017;95(3):292-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010
  21. Grace KT, & Anderson JC. Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review. Trauma, violence & abuse. 2018;19(4):371–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016663935
  22. Donnelly A, et al. Influences on reproductive decision-making among forcibly displaced women resettling in high-income countries: a scoping review and thematic analysis. International journal for equity in health. 2023;22(1):179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01993-5
  23. Eves R. Male intimate partner sexual and reproductive coercion in highlands Papua New Guinea. Richard EVES. Pacific J Reprod Health. 2021;1:667-674.
  24. Yavuz K, & Ertem A. Türk Toplumunda Kadının Statüsüne Genel Bir Bakış. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Yönetim Dergisi. 2021;(1):69-82. https://doi.org/10.35375/sayod.906552
  25. Kadir MM, et al. Do mothers-in-law matter? Family dynamics and fertility decision-making in urban squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of biosocial science. 2003;35(4):545-558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932003005984.
  26. Char A, Saavala M, & Kulmala T. Influence of mothers-in-law on young couples’ family planning decisions in rural India. Reproductive health matters. 2010;18(35):154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(10)35497-8
  27. Reilly PR. Eugenics and Involuntary Sterilization: 1907-2015. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:351-368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930
  28. Alhusen JL, et al. Intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and unintended pregnancy in women with disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2020;13(2):100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100849
  29. Grace KT, et al. Reproductive coercion in college health clinic patients: Risk factors, care seeking and perpetration. J Adv Nurs. 2023;79(4):1464-1475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15207
  30. Sarıgöl P. Kesişimsellik teorisi ve farklılıkların feminizmi. Uluslararası İnsan Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2020;3(6):331-352. https://doi.org/10.35235/uicd.715735
  31. Patel P. Forced sterilization of women as discrimination. Public Health Rev. 2017;38:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0060-9
  32. Nguyen A. Challenges for women with disabilities accessing reproductive health care around the world: a scoping review. Sexuality and Disability. 2020;38(3):371-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-020-09630-7
  33. Reina AS, Lohman BJ, & Maldonado MM. "He said they'd deport me": factors influencing domestic violence help-seeking practices among Latina immigrants. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(4):593-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505214
  34. Kim TY, Dagher RK, & Chen J. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Unintended Pregnancy: Evidence From a National Sample of U.S. Women. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(4):427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.027
  35. Swiatlo AD, Kahn NF, & Halpern CT. Intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization among young adult sexual minorities. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2020;52(2):97-105. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12138.
  36. Bender AK, & Lauritsen JL. Violent Victimization Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations in the United States: Findings From the National Crime Victimization Survey, 2017-2018. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(2):318-326. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2020.306017
  37. Lévesque S, Rousseau C, & Dumerchat M. Influence of the Relational Context on Reproductive Coercion and the Associated Consequences. Violence Against Women. 2021;27(6-7):828-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220917454
  38. European Disability Forum. Forced sterilisation of persons with disabilities in the European Union. 2022. Available from: https://www.edf-feph.org. Accessed: 30 November 2024.
  39. Women’s Media Center. (2022). The fight to end forced sterilization of disabled women and girls in Europe. Available from:https://www.womensmediacenter.com. Accessed: 30 November 2024.
  40. Graham M, et al. Re-defining reproductive coercion using a socio-ecological lens: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 17;23(1):1371. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16281-8.