Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Öğretim Elemanlarının Çatışma Yönetimi Davranış Biçimleri

Academics' Conflict Management Styles

Pages
155–162
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

T Test and One Way Anova Tests were used to determine the significant differences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Throughout the centuries, "conflict" has been observed as a major problem in educational organisations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the coming of the 21sl ceritury "conflict" became one of the most important tools in the development of organisations when it is carefully managed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:T Test and One Way Anova Tests were used to determine the significant differences.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2001-2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Throughout the centuries, "conflict" has been observed as a major problem in educational organisations. With the coming of the 21sl ceritury "conflict" became one of the most important tools in the development of organisations when it is carefully managed. The purpose of this study is to determine the reasons underlying conflict and how they are handled by academic and administrative staff. A group of academics who work at public and foundation universities in Istanbul in the 2001-2002 academic year constitutes the scope of this research. Sample group has been chosen randomly from the universities in Istanbul. The questionnaire was given its final form after a series of unstructured interviews and related literature'(Rahim 1983; Thomas, 1977) review. Analysis of the data has been done by using SPSS programme. T Test and One Way Anova Tests were used to determine the significant differences.

Özet

Uzun yıllardan beri "çatışma", eğitim örgütlerinde önemli bir problem olarak algılanmıştır. 21. Yüzyıldan itibaren çatışma, dikkatli yönetildiği takdirde, eğitim örgütlerinin, gelişmesinde önemli bir araç haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, çatışmanın altında yatan nedenleri ve bunların öğretim elemanları ve yönetim kadrosu tarafından nasıl ele alındığını incelemektir. Devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerinde 2000-2001 akademik yılında görev almış öğretim elemanları bu araştırmanın çalışma grubunu oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma grubu, İstanbul içindeki üniversitelerden basit tesadüfi örneklem yoluyla seçilmiştir. Anket, bir dizi yapılanmamış görüşme ve konuyla ilgili literatürün (Rahim 1983; Thomas, 1977) gözden geçirilmesinden sonra son halini almıştır. İstatistiksel verilerin analizinde SPSS Programı kullanılmıştır. Manidar olan sonuçların belirlenmesinde, T Testi ve Tek Yönlü Varyans analizi kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖLÇÜM, M. Ç., HAFIZOĞLU, Ö. (2004). Öğretim Elemanlarının Çatışma Yönetimi Davranış Biçimleri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 155–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/129142

References (12)

  1. ANTONIONI, D. (1998) Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9 (4), October pp.336- 356. CORNILLE, T., PESTLE, R. & VANWY, R. (1999). Teachers' conflict management styles with peers and students' parents. The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 10, no: 1, pp.69-79.
  2. DESSLER, G. (1998) Management: leading people and organisations in the 2T' Century, New York, Prentice Hall. DRORY, A. & RITOV, I. (1997). Effects of work experience and opponen's power on conflict management styles. The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 8, no: 2, pp. 148-161.
  3. GREEN, B., BREWER, N, MITCHELL, P. & WEBER, N. (2002). Gender role, organizational status, and conflict management styles. The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 13, no: 1, pp.78-94.
  4. HANSON, M. (1991) Educational administration and organisational behaviour. Massachusetts, Allyn and Bacon. JEHN, K., SHADWICK, C. & THATCHER, S. (1997) To Agree or not to agree: the effects of B- value congruence, individual denmographic disiimilarity, and conflict on workgorup outcomes. The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 8, no: 4, pp.287-305.
  5. KARİP, E. (1999)
  6. Çatışma yönetimi. Ankara,
  7. Pegem Yayıncılık. KING, N. (1999) Conflict management: personnel management. Business NH Magazine, vol. 16, no: 11, November, p.11. KOLB, D. RUBIN, M. & OSLAN, J. (1995)
  8. Organisational behaviour, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. McNARY, L. (2003). The term "win-win" in conflict management: a classical case of misuse and overuse. The Journal of Business Communication, Urbana, Vol. 40, no: 2, pp. 144-159.
  9. RAHİM, M. A. (2000) Empirical Studies on Managing Conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 1, no: 1, pp.5-9.
  10. ROBBINS, S. (1986). Organisational behaviour, concepts, controversies, and applications. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. SCHERMERHORN, J. & CHAPPELL, D. S. (2000)
  11. Introducing management. New York, John Wiley& Sons Inc. SCHERMERHORN, J. (2001)
  12. Management. New York, John Wiley. THOMAS, J. (1999) Confronting Conflict: A First Aid Kit for Handling Conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 10, no: 3, pp.304-308.