SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Puncture Ratio of the Gloves During Colorectal Surgery

KOLOREKTAL CERRAHİDE KULLANILAN ELDİVENLERDEKİ DELİNME ORANLARI

Cemil Çalıskan(Ege Üniversitesi)
Özgür Fırat(Ege Üniversitesi)
Özer Makay(Ege Üniversitesi)
Erhan Akgün(Ege Üniversitesi)
Mustafa Korkut(Ege Üniversitesi)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2010-11-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS: The overall perforation rate was 17.9%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The intact gloves are excellent barriers between the hands of the surgeon and the patient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS and METHODS: In our clinic, one thousand gloves were tested for perforation in 89 randomly selected operations, from September 01 2006 to 31 December 2006.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS: The overall perforation rate was 17.9%.
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Puncture · surgical gloves · pelvic surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The intact gloves are excellent barriers between the hands of the surgeon and the patient. Unfortunately, glove perforation is a very common problem during surgery, especially in some disciplines. Aim of this study was, to evaluate invisible glove perforation ratio during colorectal surgery. MATERIALS and METHODS: In our clinic, one thousand gloves were tested for perforation in 89 randomly selected operations, from September 01 2006 to 31 December 2006. RESULTS: The overall perforation rate was 17.9%. The prevalence of glove perforation was 27.2% and 15.3% in more than one hour and less, respectively, with significant difference. The prevalence of glove perforation was 27.09% and 17.06% in pelvic surgery or non-pelvic surgery, respectively, with significant difference. The glove perforation rate for the operator, the first and the second assistant and nurse were 23.5, 18.8, 4.3 and 8.4% for all of the operations, respectively. CONCLUSION: Changing gloves at regular intervals (especially non-dominant hand, less than one hour) is an effective way to decrease the incidence of possible glove perforation during colorectal surgery.

Özet

AMAÇ:Sağlam eldivenler cerrahın eli ile hasta arasında mükemmel bir bariyerdir. Ne var ki; eldivenlerdedelinme cerrahi sırasında özellikle bazı disiplinlerde çok yaygın bir problemdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı kolorektalcerrahi girişimler sırasında meydana gelen ve gözle görülmeyen eldiven delinmelerinin oranını ortaya koymaktır.GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM:Kliniğimizde Eylül-Aralık 2006 tarihleri arasında rastgele seçilmiş 89 ameliyattakullanılan 1000 adet eldiven delinme oranının araştırılması için test edildi.BULGULAR:Tüm eldivenlerde delinme oranı %17.9 olarak saptandı. Aradaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıolmak üzere bir saatten fazla kullanılanlarda delinme oranı %27.23 ve bir saatten az kullanılanlarda %15.37olarak saptandı. Yine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı biçimde pelvik cerrahide kullanılan eldivenlerde delinme oranı%27.09 ve pelvis dışı karın cerrahisinde kullanılanlarda %17.06 olmak üzere fark saptandı. Ameliyat ekibinintüm ameliyatlar için eldivenlerinde meydana gelen delinme oranlarına bakıldığında sırasıyla operatör, birinciikinci asistan ve ameliyat hemşiresi olmak üzere oranlar %23.5, 18.8, 4.3 ve 8.4 olarak izlendi.SONUÇ:Kolorektal cerrahi girişimler sırasında eldivenlerin düzenli olarak değiştirilmesi (özellikle pelvikcerrahide, dominant olmayan el için, bir saatten kısa aralıklarla) eldivenlerde delik bulunması olasılığını etkinbir şekilde azaltmanın bir yoludur

🔖

Cite This Article

Çalıskan, C., Fırat, Ö., Makay, Ö., Akgün, E., Korkut, M. (2010). Puncture Ratio of the Gloves During Colorectal Surgery. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 11 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1291231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Ergin K. Cerrahların yüzyılı. Ankara Tıp Mecmuası 1995;48:27-42.
  2. Hansen KN, Korniewicz DM, Hexter DA, Kornilow JR, Kelen GD. Loss of glove integrity during emergency department procedures. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:65-72.
  3. Marcus R, Culver DH, Bell DM, et al. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection among emergency department workers.Am J Med 1993;94:363370
  4. Kelen GD, Gren GB, Purcell RH, et al. Hepatitis B and hepatitis C in emergency department patients. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1399-404
  5. Cole WR, Bernard HR. Inadequacies of present methods of surgical skin preparation. Arch Surg 1964;89:215-22.
  6. Laine T, Aarnio P. How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparision between single gloves and a double-gloving system. The Am J Surg 2001;181(6):564-6.
  7. Sohn R, Murray M, Franko A, Hwang P. Detection of surgical glove integrity. TheAm Surg 2000;66:302-6.
  8. Gren SE, Gompertz RH. Glove perforation during surgery: What are the risks? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1992:74;306-8.
  9. Doyle PM, Alvi S, Johanson R. The effectiveness of double gloving in obstetrics and gynaecology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:83-4.
  10. Dodds DA, Barker SGE, Morgan NH, Donalson DR, Thomas MH. Self protection in surgery: the use of double gloves. Br J Surg 1990;77:219-20.
  11. Matta H, Thompson AN, Rainey JB. Does wearing two pairs of gloves protect operating theatre staff from skin contamination? BMJ 1998;297:597-8.
  12. Cole RP, Gault DT. Glove perforation during plastic surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1989:42;481-3.
  13. Hollaus PH, Lax F, Janakiev D,Wurnig PN, Pridun NS. Glove perforation rate in open lung surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999:15(4):461-4.
  14. Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. Increased awareness of glove perforation in major joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79:371-3.
  15. Fell M, Hopper W, Williams J, et al. Surgical glove failure rate,Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1989;71:7-10.
  16. Naver P, Gottrup F. Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Eur J Surg 2000;166:293-5.
  17. Brown JN. Surgeon protection: early recognition of glove perforation using a green under glove. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1996;41:395-6.
  18. Eckford SD, James M, Jackson SR. Detection of glove puncture and skin contamination during caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;140:1209-11.