SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

The Effects of Team, Position and Pkysical Feature Factors on Body Composition in Professional and Amateur Soccer Players

PROFESYONEL VE AMATÖR FUTBOLCULARDA TAKIM, MEVKİ VE FİZİKSEL YAPI FAKTÖRLERİNİN VÜCUT KOMPOZİSYONU ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

Sacide Karakaş
Yüksel Yıldız
Hayrullah Köse
Sadun Temoçin
Kadir Kızılkaya
Pages
—
Publication Date
2011-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: The factors of team, position and physical features have the effects in some body composition parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: It was aimed to evaluate the effects of team, position and physical feature factors on body composition in professional and amateur soccer players via anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS and METHODS: A total of 56 football players in two amateur (A1 and A2) and a second division professional soccer teams (P) in …..City were assessed for height, weight, body fat mass (FM), fat free mass (FFM), total body water (TBW) and body mass index (BMI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: The factors of team, position and physical features have the effects in some body composition parameters.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Soccer · body composition · anthropometry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It was aimed to evaluate the effects of team, position and physical feature factors on body composition in professional and amateur soccer players via anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods. MATERIALS and METHODS: A total of 56 football players in two amateur (A1 and A2) and a second division professional soccer teams (P) in …..City were assessed for height, weight, body fat mass (FM), fat free mass (FFM), total body water (TBW) and body mass index (BMI). In addition skin fold thickness of different regions and perimeters were measured. The weight-height, skinfold thicknesses, BIA parameters and circumferences were measured using a digital scale and a stadiometer mounted to the scale, Harpenden Skinfold Caliper, BIA 101 instrument and inflexible tape measure respectively. Data were analyzed in SAS statistics program. RESULTS: 56 soccer players (18A1, 21A2 and 17P) were consist of 15 forward, 8 goalkeeper, 22 midfielder and 11 defender. The most effective factors in the statistical model were team, position and physical characteristics. While team factor was effective in anthropometric measurements, position factor was effective on BIA measurements. Physical characteristics had a correlation with the parameters measured by both methods. CONCLUSION: The factors of team, position and physical features have the effects in some body composition parameters.

Özet

AMAÇ:Profesyonel ve amatör futbolcularda takım, mevki ve fiziksel yapı faktörlerinin vücut kompozisyonuüzerine etkilerinin antropometri ve biyoelektriksel impedans analiz (BİA) yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesiamaçlanmıştır.GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM:Aydın ilindeki iki amatör (A , A ) ve bir profesyonel ikinci lig (P) futbol takımındaoynayan toplam 56 futbolcuda boy, kilo, vücut yağı (VY), yağ dışı kitle (YDK), toplam vücut suyu (TVS), vücutkitle indeksi (VKİ) ölçümleriyle çeşitli bölgelere ait deri kıvrım kalınlıkları ve çevre ölçümleri yapıldı. Boy, kiloölçümleri “Seca” marka boy ve kilo ölçer; VY, YDK ve TVS ölçümleri biyoelektriksel impedans analizi (BİA)101 cihazı; deri kalınlıkları “Harpenden” marka kaliper; çevre ölçümleriyse esnemeyen mezür kullanılarakyapıldı. Ölçümler aynı kişiler tarafından ikişer defa yapıldı ve ortalaması alındı. Verilerin analizi SAS istatistikprogramı kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi.BULGULAR:Araştırmaya katılan üç takımdaki 56 futbolcunun (18A , 21A ve 17P) 15'i forvet; 8'i kaleci;22'si orta saha; 11'i ise defans mevkiinde oynamaktaydı. İstatistiksel modelde etkisi yüksek olan faktörler; takım,mevki ve fiziksel yapıydı (boy, ağırlık). Takım faktörü antropometrik ölçümler üzerinde etkiliyken mevkifaktörü BİA ölçümleri üzerine daha etkiliydi. Fiziksel yapı faktörüyse her iki yöntemle ölçülen özelliklerledoğrusal ilişki göstermekteydi.SONUÇ:Futbolda takım, mevki ve fiziksel yapı faktörlerinin futbolcuların vücut kompozisyon değerleriüzerine etkisi vardır

🔖

Cite This Article

Karakaş, S., Yıldız, Y., Köse, H., Temoçin, S., Kızılkaya, K. (2011). The Effects of Team, Position and Pkysical Feature Factors on Body Composition in Professional and Amateur Soccer Players. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1291216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (72)

  1. ,19,23,24], 1 8, 1 9, 2 3, 2 4 i) ii)her mevkinin 1. Reilly T. Fitness assessment. In: Reilly T, ed.Science and soccer, E. & FN Spon, London, 1996:25-50. 2. Reeves SL, Poh BK, Brown M, Tizzard NH, Ismail
  2. MN. Anthropometric measurements and body
  3. composition of English and Malaysian footballers. Mal
  4. J Nutr 1999;5:79-86. 3. Mangine RE, Noyes FR, Mullen MP, Barber-Westin
  5. SD.Aphysiological profile of the elite soccer athlete. J
  6. Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990;12(4):147-52. 4. Ostojic SM. Changes in body fat content of top-level
  7. soccer players. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2002;1:54-55. 5. Bale P. The relationship of physique and body
  8. composition to strength in a group of physical
  9. education students. Br J Sports Med 1980;14 (4):193- 98. 6. Novak LP, Magill LA, Schutte JE. Maximal oxygen
  10. intake and body composition of female dancers. Eur J
  11. Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1978;39(4):277-82. 7. Raven PB, Gettman LR, Pollock ML, Cooper KH. A
  12. physiological evaluation of professional soccer
  13. players. Br J Sports Med 1976;10(4):209-16. 8. Kayıhan G, Ersöz G. Comparison of the different
  14. methods of measurement used in the detection of body
  15. fat rate and diagnosis of obesity in adolescents aged
  16. from 15 upto 18. Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Sci;1(2):107-16. 9. Şanlıer N, Yabancı N, Arlı M. Assessment of body
  17. composition in university students. Turkiye Klinikleri J
  18. Pediatr Sci 2005; 1(10): 49-52. 10. Karakaş S, Taşer F, Yıldız Y, Köse H. Tıp Fakültesi ve
  19. Spor Yüksekokulu öğrencilerinde biyoelektriksel
  20. impedans analiz (BIA) yöntemi ile vücut
  21. kompozisyonlarının karşılaştırılması. Adnan
  22. Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2005;6(3):5-9. 11. Clark NA, Edwards AM, Morton RH, Butterly RJ.
  23. Season-to-season variations of physiological fitness
  24. within a squad of professional male soccer players.
  25. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2008;7:157- 65. 12. Çıkmaz S, Taşkınalp O, Uluçam E, Yılmaz A,
  26. Çakıroğlu M. Futbolcularda gövde ile ilgili
  27. antropometrik ölçüler ve oranlar. Trakya Üniversitesi
  28. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2005;22(1):32-6. 13. Sınırkavak G, Dal U, Çetinkaya Ö. Elit sporcularda
  29. vücut kompozisyonu ile maksimal oksijen kapasitesi
  30. arasındaki ilişki. C. Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;26 (4):171-6. 14. Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM. Bioelectrical impedance
  31. method. In: Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM, eds.Applied
  32. body composition assessment. Champaign: Human
  33. Kinetics; 1996: 44-55. 15. Müniroğlu S, Atıl M, Erongun D, Marancı B. The
  34. effects of physical characteristics of soccer teams in
  35. their successes. Futbol Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 1999;2: 21-5. 16. Açıkada C, Hazır T, Aşçı A, Turnagöl H, Özkara A.
  36. Physical and physiological profiles of a second division
  37. professional soccer team in preseason term. Futbol
  38. Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 1999;1:14-20. 17. Tamer K, Cicioğlu İ, Yüce A, Çimen O. Comparison of
  39. physical and physiological characteristics of
  40. professional soccer players playing in three different
  41. divisions. Futbol Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 1996;2:25-8. 18. Melchiorri G, Monteleone G, Andreoli A, Callà C,
  42. Sgroi M, De Lorenzo A. Body cell mass measured by
  43. bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy in professional
  44. football (soccer) players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness;47(4):408-12. 19. McIntyre MC, Hall M. Physiological profile in relation
  45. to playing position of elite college Gaelic footballers.
  46. Br J Sports Med 2005;39(5):264-6. 20. Andreoli A, Melchiorri G, Brozzi M, Di Marco A,
  47. Volpe SL, Garofano P, et al. Effect of different sports on
  48. body cell mass in highly trained athletes. Acta Diabetol;40 Suppl 1: S122-5. 21. Akın S, Öner Ö, Özberk N, Ertan H, Korkusuz F.
  49. Comparison of physical characteristics and isokinetic
  50. knee muscle strengths in professional and amateur
  51. football players]. Journal of Arthroplasty &
  52. Arthroscopic Surgery 2004;15(3):161-7. 22. Vescovi JD, Brown TD, Murray TM. Positional
  53. characteristics of physical performance in Division I
  54. college female soccer players. J Sports Med Phys
  55. Fitness 2006;46(2):221-6. 23. Bloomfield J, Polman R, Butterly R, O'Donoghue P.
  56. Analysis of age, stature, body mass, BMI and quality of
  57. elite soccer players from 4 European Leagues. J Sports
  58. Med Phys Fitness 2005;45(1):58-67. 24. Gil SM, Gil J, Ruiz F, Irazusta A, Irazusta J.
  59. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of
  60. young soccer players according to their playing
  61. position: relevance for the selection process. J Strength
  62. Cond Res 2007;21(2):438-45. 25. Pyne DB, Gardner AS, Sheehan K, Hopkins WG.
  63. Positional differences in fitness and anthropometric
  64. characteristics in Australian football. Journal of
  65. Science and Medicine in Sport 2006;9(1-2):143-50. 26. Akın M, Kıreker İ, Köklü Y. Comparison of 16-year
  66. old group Professional league soccer players' some
  67. physical characteristics in terms of their league level
  68. and positions. Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Sci;1(2):72-8. 27. Wittich A, Mautalen CA, Oliveri MB, Bagur A,
  69. Somoza F, Rotemberg E. Professional football (soccer) players have a markedly greater skeletel mineral content, density and size than age-and BMI-matched controls. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;63 (2):112-7. 28. Matkovic BR, Misigoj-Durakovic M, Matkovic B,
  70. Jankovic S, Ruzic L, Leko G, et al. Morphological
  71. differences of elite Croatian soccer players according
  72. to the team position. Coll Antropol 2003;27 Suppl 1:167-74. YAZIŞMA ADRESİ E-Posta:[email protected] Geliş Tarihi Kabul Tarihi:05.01.2011, 1 8, 1 9, 2 3, 2 4 i) ii)her mevkinin 1. Reilly T. Fitness assessment. In: Reilly T, ed.Science and soccer, E. & FN Spon, London, 1996:25-50. 2. Reeves SL, Poh BK, Brown M, Tizzard NH, Ismail:[email protected] Geliş Tarihi Kabul Tarihi:05.01.2011