Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 20 Issue: 2

Relationship Between the Number of Cesarean Deliveries and Maternal-fetal Complications

Özgür Deniz Turan(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Ezgi Özdemir(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Tolga Atakul(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Emre Zafer(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is a need for future studies with even larger patients to support our findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cesarean operation is very common and it is being performed increasingly all over the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We included patients who underwent cesarean section in our clinic between October 2014 and October 2017, who had no additional disease, between 38 and 40 gestational weeks, and ages between 18 and 40 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is a need for future studies with even larger patients to support our findings.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cesarean · fetal · maternal

Abstract

Objective: Cesarean operation is very common and it is being performed increasingly all over the world. In this study, the effect of the number of cesarean deliveries on maternal and fetal health was evaluated. Materials and Methods: We included patients who underwent cesarean section in our clinic between October 2014 and October 2017, who had no additional disease, between 38 and 40 gestational weeks, and ages between 18 and 40 years. Postnatal records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had pregnancy complications such as pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, or who had a dysmorphic appearing baby or with any genetic syndrome were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups according to the number of cesareans they had undergone. Group 1 consisted of patients with history of two cesarean deliveries, group 2 consisted of patients with 3 cesarean deliveries and group three consisted of patients with 4 or more cesarean deliveries. Groups were then compared to each other for their demographic data and maternal - fetal outcomes. Results: Mean age of the patients studied was 32.4 years [standard deviation (SD): 4.4], mean gestational week was 38 weeks and 2 days (SD: 0.55), and mean hospitalization duration was: 4.4 days (SD: 1.0). There was no significant correlation between the number of cesarean section and the parameters of birth weight, duration of hospital stay, and appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration scores. Conclusion: The history for the number of previous cesarean deliveries for a pregnancy may not seem to be correlated with increased maternal or fetal complications up to four previous cesarean deliveries. There is a need for future studies with even larger patients to support our findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turan, Ö. D., Özdemir, E., Atakul, T., Zafer, E. (2019). Relationship Between the Number of Cesarean Deliveries and Maternal-fetal Complications. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 20 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.29292

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Saleh AM, Dudenhausen JW, Ahmed B. Increased rates of cesarean sections and large families: a potentially dangerous combination. J Perinat Med 26; 45: 517-21.
  2. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health/Family Planning (Turkey), Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Macro International Inc. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 1998, Ankara.
  3. Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 7-18.
  4. Huang X, Lei J, Tan H, Walker M, Zhou J, Wen SW. Cesarean delivery for first pregnancy and neonatal morbidity and mortality in second pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 158: 204-8.
  5. Yang XJ, Sun SS. Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 503-12.
  6. Hall MH, Campbell DM, Fraser C, Lemon J. Mode of delivery and future fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1297-303.
  7. Hemminki E. Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancy: a review of cohort studies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1996; 10: 366-79.
  8. Çintesun E, Al RA. The effect of increased number of cesarean on maternal and fetal outcomes. Ginekol Pol 2017; 88: 613-19.
  9. Rashid M, Rashid RS. Higher order repeat caesarean sections: how safe are five or more? BJOG 2004; 111: 1090-4.
  10. Kaplanoglu M, Bulbul M, Kaplanoglu D, Bakacak SM. Effect of multiple repeat cesarean sections on maternal morbidity: data from southeast Turkey. Med Sci Monit 2015; 21: 1447-53.
  11. Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 262.e1-8.
  12. Uygur D, Gun O, Kelekci S, Ozturk A, Ugur M, Mungan T. Multiple repeat caesarean section: is it safe? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 119: 171-5.
  13. Uyanikoglu H, Karahan MA, Turp AB, Agar M, Tasduzen ME, Sak S, et al. Are multiple repeated cesarean sections really as safe? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30: 482-5.
  14. Rouse DJ, MacPherson C, Landon M, Varner MW, Leveno KJ, Moawad AH, et al. Blood transfusion and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 891-7.
  15. Hershkowitz R, Fraser D, Mazor M, Leiberman JR. One or multiple previous cesarean sections are associated with similar increased frequency of placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62: 185-8.
  16. Odibo AO, Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Stevens EJ, Peipert JF, Macones GA. Predicting placental abruption and previa in women with a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 299-305.
  17. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 976-80.
  18. Laughon SK, Wolfe HM, Visco AG. Prior cesarean and the risk for placenta previa on second-trimester ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 962-5.
  19. Iacovelli A, Liberati M, Khalil A, Timor-Tritsch I, Leombroni M, Buca D, et al. Risk factors for abnormally invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 22: 1-11.
  20. Taylor VM, Kramer MD, Vaughan TL, Peacock S. Placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery: how strong is the association? Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 55-7.
  21. Olive EC, Roberts CL, Algert CS, Morris JM. Placenta praevia: maternal morbidity and place of birth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 499-504.
  22. Yaman Tunc S, Agacayak E, Sak S, Basaranoglu S, Goruk NY, Turgut A, et al. Multiple repeat caesarean deliveries: do they increase maternal and neonatal morbidity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30: 739-44.