Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2021 / Volume: 22 Issue: 3

Validity of Metric Assessment of Mastoid Triangle in Sex Determination: An Anatomical Study

Hatice Kübra Başaloğlu(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Nazlı Gülriz Çeri(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Mehmet Turgut(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Eda Duygu İpek(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Gizem Sakallı(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In the light of the obtained results, the discriminant function analyses of the mastoid triangle measurements are concluded to be reliable in sex determination and preferable in forensic medicine and anthropology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the mastoid triangle anthropometric measurements and area between the three craniometric points, namely porion (po), asterion (ast), and mastoidale (ms) as a sex determinant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 60 dry skulls (30 males and 30 females) were assessed for 10 morphometric measurements with a compass, and a total of 120 mastoid triangles were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the light of the obtained results, the discriminant function analyses of the mastoid triangle measurements are concluded to be reliable in sex determination and preferable in forensic medicine and anthropology.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mastoid triangle · sexual dimorphism · skull

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the mastoid triangle anthropometric measurements and area between the three craniometric points, namely porion (po), asterion (ast), and mastoidale (ms) as a sex determinant. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 dry skulls (30 males and 30 females) were assessed for 10 morphometric measurements with a compass, and a total of 120 mastoid triangles were evaluated. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in all the mastoid triangle measurements between males and females (p≤0.01). Discriminant function analyses revealed that the left po-ms length and the total area of the mastoid triangle were two variables with the highest sensitivity at an accuracy rate of 90%. The models with three mastoid triangle variables including the total po-ms, total ms-ast, and total po-ast measurements, in combination, provided high discriminant potentials of 96.7% and 93.3% in females and males, respectively. When the total po-ms, total ms-ast, and total po-ast were used together, a greater sexual dimorphism was observed, correctly classifying the sex with a 95% accuracy rate. The mean value of the total area which is preferred due to the asymmetry between the sides of the skull was 1455.2 mm² in males and 1341.2 mm² in females. Conclusion: In the light of the obtained results, the discriminant function analyses of the mastoid triangle measurements are concluded to be reliable in sex determination and preferable in forensic medicine and anthropology.

🔖

Cite This Article

Başaloğlu, H. K., Çeri, N. G., Turgut, M., İpek, E. D., Sakallı, G. (2021). Validity of Metric Assessment of Mastoid Triangle in Sex Determination: An Anatomical Study. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 22 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.58672

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kanchan T, Gupta A, Krishan K. Estimation of sex from mastoid triangle - a craniometric analysis. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20: 855-60.
  2. Sinhorini PA, Costa IAP, Lopez-Capp TT, Biazevic MGH, de Paiva LAS. Comparative analysis of four morphometric methods for sex estimation: A study conducted on human skulls. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2019; 39: 29-34.
  3. Jain D, Jasuja OP, Nath S. Sex determination of human crania using Mastoid triangle and Opisthion-Bimastoid triangle. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20: 255-9.
  4. Passey J, Mishra SR, Singh R, Sushobhna K, Singh S, Sinha P. Sex determination using mastoid process. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2015; 6: 93-5.
  5. Ornoy A, Weinstein-Fudim L, Ergaz Z. Methods for Prenatal Sex Determination and Their Importance in Understanding and Prevention of Gender-Related Birth Defects. Intech Open, Book Chapter 2020: 1-21.
  6. Sierp I, Henneberg M. The Difficulty of Sexing Skeletons from Unknown Populations. Journal of Anthropology 2015: 1-13.
  7. Bhagya BS, Hema N, Ramakrishna A. Validation metrics of the mastoid triangle. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences 2013; 3: 44-5.
  8. Kemkes A, Göbel T. Metric assessment of the “mastoid triangle” for sex determination: a validation study. J Forensic Sci 2006; 51: 985-9.
  9. Nagaoka T, Shizushima A, Sawada J, Tomo S, Hoshino K, Sato H, et al. Sex determination using mastoid process measurements: standards for japanese human skeletons of the medieval and early modern periods. Anthropological Science 2008; 116: 105-13.
  10. Suazo I, Matamala DZ, Smith RL. Sex determination using mastoid process measurements in Brazilian skulls. International Journal of Morphology 2008; 26: 941e4.
  11. de Paiva LA, Segre M. Sexing the human skull through the mastoid process. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2003; 58: 15-20.
  12. Işcan MY. Wilton Marion Krogman, Ph.D. (1903-1987): the end of an era. J Forensic Sci 1988; 33: 1473-6.
  13. Toneva DH, Nikolova SY, Zlatareva DK, Hadjidekov VG, Lazarov NE. Sex estimation by Mastoid Triangle using 3D models. Homo 2019; 70: 63-73.
  14. Jaja BN, Ajua CO, Didia BC. Mastoid triangle for sex determination in adult Nigerian population: a validation study. J Forensic Sci 2013; 58: 1575-8.
  15. Ucerler H, Govsa F. Asterion as a surgical landmark for lateral cranial base approaches. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34: 415-20.