AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightThis result shown that the macula and corneal thickness cannot be used as indicators of retinopathy and keratopathy.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Objective: The comparison of a central corneal (CCT) and central foveal thickness (CMT) of type 2 patients with diabetes with a healthy control group and determine the difference according to fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c) levels and time of diabetes. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with diabetes without retinopathy and 47 healthy controls of similar age and gender were compared. The mean of three consecutive corneal thickness measurements at the central cornea was obtained by the Pentacam HR imaging system (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and macular thickness was obtained by Heildenberg optical coherence tomography (OCT). The fiber Bragg grating (FBG) and HbA1c levels of all participants were evaluated. The analysis was performed on the right eye. Results: Groups were statistically similar in terms of age and gender (p>0.05). Patients with diabetes had significantly higher FBG and HbA1c values than controls and the percentage of patients with HbA1c values less than 8% in Type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly lower than healthy controls (p 0.05). Conclusion: In our study, diabetic participants without DR had no difference at CCT and CMT between non-diabetic controls. This result shown that the macula and corneal thickness cannot be used as indicators of retinopathy and keratopathy.