Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2025 / Volume: 26 Issue: 4

Evaluation of the Sacrorectal Angle and Presacral Width: A Novel MRI-Based Assessment

Sakrorektal Açının ve Presakral Genişliğin Değerlendirilmesi: MR Görüntülemeye Dayalı Yeni Bir Yaklaşım

Murat Kaya(Gaziantep City Hospital)0000-0002-1251-1292
Osman Konukoğlu(Gaziantep City Hospital)0000-0002-3353-0230
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The study unveiled a disparity in evaluating the presacral-retrorectal fatty plane based on gender, noting a broader dimension in men compared to women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Lesions in the presacral-retrorectal space can be benign, malignant, or congenital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on pelvic MRI examinations for 295 patients at our institution from October 2023 to February 2024.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The study unveiled a disparity in evaluating the presacral-retrorectal fatty plane based on gender, noting a broader dimension in men compared to women.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gender Differences · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · Presacral-retrorectal

Abstract

Introduction: Lesions in the presacral-retrorectal space can be benign, malignant, or congenital. It is crucial to understand the standard limits regarding the width of this area. To determine the differences between men and women by measuring the width of the retrorectal-presacral fatty area and to reveal the normal width range in this area. Materials and Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on pelvic MRI examinations for 295 patients at our institution from October 2023 to February 2024. In consensus with two radiologists with ten years of experience, measurements were taken from images obtained on the sagittal T2A plane. Statistical analysis: Pearson chi-square test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney U test, independent sample t-test Results: At the Sacral1, Sacral2, and Sacral3 levels, the presacral distance in males was statistically more significant than in females. The mean values for measurements at the Sacral1 level were 17.5 ± 8.7 mm in men and 12.2 ± 8.7 mm in women. At the Sacral2 level, they were 14.2 ± 6.6 mm in men and 10.4 ± 5.7 mm in women. At the Sacral3 level, the mean values were 12.8 ± 5.7 mm in men and 8.6 ± 4.8 mm in women (P<0.001). Sacrorectal angle (SRA) at the Sacral1, Sacral2, and Sacral3 levels was significantly larger in men compared to women, measuring 9.3 ± 4.8 mm versus 6.7 ± 4.7 degrees (p<0.001). Conclusion: The study unveiled a disparity in evaluating the presacral-retrorectal fatty plane based on gender, noting a broader dimension in men compared to women.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaya, M., Konukoğlu, O. (2025). Evaluation of the Sacrorectal Angle and Presacral Width: A Novel MRI-Based Assessment. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 26 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1718102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Jin Z-m, Peng J-Y, Zhu Q-C, Yin L. Waldeyer’s fascia: anatomical location and relationship to neighboring fasciae in retrorectal space. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. 2011;33(10):851-4.
  2. Ghosh J, Eglinton T, Frizelle F, Watson AJ. Presacral tumours in adults. The Surgeon. 2007;5(1):31-8.
  3. Zhou P, Clark E, Kapadia M. A systematic review of presacral extramedullary haematopoiesis: a diagnosis to be considered for presacral masses. Colorectal Disease. 2016;18(11):1033-40.
  4. Sheikh U, Rodic N, Maleki Z. Extramedullary hematopoiesis: cytomorphologic, histologic, and radiologic findings in sixteen cases. Acta cytologica. 2015;59(2):144-8.
  5. Dziki Ł, Włodarczyk M, Sobolewska-Włodarczyk A, Saliński A, Salińska M, Tchórzewski M, et al. Presacral tumors: diagnosis and treatment–a challenge for a surgeon. Archives of Medical Science. 2019;15(3):722-9.
  6. Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Lowney JK, Fleshman JW, Kodner IJ, Mutch DG, et al. Retrorectal tumors: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2005;48(8):1581-7.
  7. Yang B-L, Gu Y-F, Shao W-J, Chen H-J, Sun G-D, Jin H-Y, et al. Retrorectal tumors in adults: magnetic resonance imaging findings. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2010;16(46):5822.
  8. Boscà A, Pous S, Artés M, Gómez F, Granero Castro P, García‐Granero E. Tumours of the retrorectal space: management and outcome of a heterogeneous group of diseases. Colorectal Disease. 2012;14(11):1418-23.
  9. Dozois EJ, Marcos MDH. Presacral tumors. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. 2011:359-74.
  10. Hosseini-Nik H, Hosseinzadeh K, Bhayana R, Jhaveri KS. MR imaging of the retrorectal–presacral tumors: an algorithmic approach. Abdominal imaging. 2015;40:2630-44.
  11. Macafee D, Sagar P, El‐Khoury T, Hyland R. Retrorectal tumours: optimization of surgical approach and outcome. Colorectal Disease. 2012;14(11):1411-7.
  12. Oto A, Peynircioglu B, Eryilmaz M, Besim A, Sürücü HS, Çelik HH. Determination of the width of the presacral space on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. 2004;17(1):14-6.
  13. Akinmade A, Adekeye OA, Edem EE, Adegbehingbe O, Adegbilero-Iwari OE. Determination of the width of the presacral space on magnetic resonance imaging among adults in south-western Nigeria. Acta Radiologica. 2024;65(3):253-8.
  14. Kattan KR, King AY. Presacral space revisited. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1979;132(3):437-9.
  15. Gulbrand K, Laporte A, Sammarco A, Masteling M, Swensson J, De Lancey J, et al. The presacral space re-visited. correlation between presacral depth and body mass index (BMI). American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2024;230(4):S1161-S2.
  16. Baek SK, Hwang GS, Vinci A, Jafari MD, Jafari F, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, et al. Retrorectal tumors: a comprehensive literature review. World journal of surgery. 2016;40(8):2001-15.
  17. Haval S, Dwivedi D, Nichkaode P. Presacral Tailgut Cyst. Annals of African Medicine. 2024;23(2):237-41.
  18. Garrido-Abad P, Sinués-Ojas BA, Fernández-Arjona M. Unusual case of voiding symptoms and constipation: Retrorectal cystic hamartoma. Urology. 2016;91:e5-e6.
  19. Brown IS, Sokolova A, Rosty C, Graham RP. Cystic lesions of the retrorectal space. Histopathology. 2023;82(2):232-41.