SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 1

Effect of Air Blowing Pressure on Dentin Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives

HAVA ÜFLEME BASINCININ ÜNİVERSAL ADEZİVLERİN DENTİN BAĞLANMA GÜCÜ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Buket Karalar(Sakarya University)0000-0002-7855-1246
Nurcan Özakar(ATATURK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY)0000-0003-4023-6723
Yusuf Ziya Bayındır(ATATURK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY)0000-0003-0943-1352
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Different air-blowing pressures in universal adhesives significantly influence bond strength.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study investigated the shear bond strength of universal adhesive systems applied to dentin at different air-blowing pressures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Flat dentin surfaces were prepared from 120 freshly extracted, caries-free human molar teeth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Different air-blowing pressures in universal adhesives significantly influence bond strength.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:air blowing · bond strength · dentin

Abstract

Aim: This study investigated the shear bond strength of universal adhesive systems applied to dentin at different air-blowing pressures. Materials and Methods: Flat dentin surfaces were prepared from 120 freshly extracted, caries-free human molar teeth. Three universal adhesives were used: G-Premio Bond (GP), Clearfil S3 Bond Universal (CU), and Scotchbond Universal (SU). The samples were randomly divided into groups according to the adhesives and the air blowing pressures (0.14 MPa, 0.28 MPa and 0.41 MPa) (n=10). In each adhesive system, an unpressurized group was designated as the control group (n = 10). The shear bond strength values were measured using a universal testing device (Instron 3344, Instron Corp, Wilmington, USA). The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test at a significance level of 0.05. Results: No statistically significant difference was found based on all variables and their interactions (p>0.05), only the material groups showed a significant difference (P=0.000). The highest mean value was obtained at a pressure of 0.41 MPa in the SU group (17.40±6.01), 0.14 MPa in the CU group (17.52±4.46), and 0.28 MPa in the GP group (10.05±3.89). Conclusion: Different air-blowing pressures in universal adhesives significantly influence bond strength.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, farklı hava üfleme basınçlarında dentine uygulanan üniversal adeziv sistemlerinin makaslama bağlanma dayanımı araştırılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 120 adet taze çekilmiş, çürüksüz insan azı dişinden düz dentin yüzeyleri hazırlandı. Üç adet üniversal adeziv kullanıldı: G-Premio Bond (GP), Clearfil S3 Bond Universal (CU) ve Scotchbond Universal (SU). Örnekler, adezivlere ve hava üfleme basınçlarına (0,14 MPa, 0,28 MPa ve 0,41 MPa) göre rastgele gruplara ayrıldı (n=10). Her adeziv sistemde, basınç uygulanmayan bir grup kontrol grubu olarak belirlendi (n=10). Makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerleri, üniversal bir test cihazı (Instron 3344, Instron Corp, Wilmington, ABD) kullanılarak ölçüldü. Veriler, ANOVA ve Tukey post-hoc testi kullanılarak 0,05 anlamlılık düzeyinde analiz edildi. Bulgular: Tüm değişkenler ve bunların etkileşimleri açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken (p>0,05), yalnızca adeziv sistem grupları anlamlı bir fark gösterdi (P=0,000). En yüksek ortalama değer, SU grubunda 0,41 MPa basınçta (17,40±6,01), CU grubunda 0,14 MPa basınçta (17,52±4,46) ve GP grubunda 0,28 MPa basınçta (10,05±3,89) elde edildi. Sonuç: Universal adeziv sistemlerde farklı hava üfleme basınçları bağlanma dayanımını önemli ölçüde etkilemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karalar, B., Özakar, N., Bayındır, Y. Z. (2026). Effect of Air Blowing Pressure on Dentin Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 27 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1748086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Fu J, Saikaew P, Kawano S, Carvalho RM, Hannig M, Sano H, et al. Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2017; 33(8): 895-903.
  2. Jang JH, Jeon BK, Mo SY, Park M, Choi D, Choi KK, et al. Effect of various agitation methods on adhesive layer formation of HEMA-free universal dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J 2019; 38(1): 101-106.
  3. Bourgi R, Hardan L, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Scavello F, Mancino D, Kharouf N, et al. The use of warm air for solvent evaporation in adhesive dentistry: A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Funct Biomater 2023; 14(5): 285.
  4. Betancourt D, Baldion P, Castellanos J. Resin‐dentin bonding interface: mechanisms of degradation and strategies for stabilization of the hybrid layer. Int J Biomater 2019(1); 5268342.
  5. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2015; 43(10): 1229-1234.
  6. Silva E, Penelas AG, Simmer FS, Paiva R, Moreira E, Poskus LT. Can the use of a warm-air stream for solvent evaporation lead to a dangerous temperature increase during dentin hybridization. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 335-340.
  7. Stape THS, Tjäderhane L, Abuna G, Sinhoreti MAC, Martins LRM, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Optimization of the etch-and-rinse technique: New perspectives to improve resin–dentin bonding and hybrid layer integrity by reducing residual water using dimethyl sulfoxide pretreatments. Dent Mater 2018; 34(7): 967-977.
  8. Karalar B, Bayındır YZ. Effects of adhesive application time and air blowing pressure on dentin bond strength of self-etch mode universal adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol 2022; 36(3): 287-301.
  9. Saikaew P, Matsumoto M, Chowdhury A, Carvalho R, Sano H. Does shortened application time affect long-term bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin? Oper Dent 2018; 43(5): 549-558.
  10. Hardan L, Bourgi R, Kharouf N, Mancino D, Zarow M, Jakubowicz N, et al. Bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Polymers 2021; 13(5): 814.
  11. Fu J, Pan F, Kakuda S, Sidhu SK, Ikeda T, Nakaoki Y, et al. The effect of air-blowing duration on all-in-one systems. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(6): 1075-1081.
  12. Daneshmehr L, Ozer F, Mante FK, Blatz MB. Relationship between air-blowing duration and bond strengths of three adhesive systems to dentin after thermal aging. Dent Mater J 2013; 32(5): 767-774.
  13. Carvalho CN, Lanza MDS, Dourado LG, Carvalho EM, Bauer J. Impact of solvent evaporation and curing protocol on degree of conversion of etch‐and‐rinse and multimode adhesives systems. Int J Dent 2019; 2019(1): 5496784.
  14. Chen Y, Yan X, Li K, Zheng S, Sano H, Zhan D,et al. Effect of air-blowing temperature and water storage time on the bond strength of five universal adhesive systems to dentin. Dent Mater J 2021; 40(1): 116-122.
  15. Saikaew P, Fu J, Chowdhury AA, Carvalho RM, Sano H. Effect of air-blowing time and long-term storage on bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23(6): 2629-2635.
  16. Saikaew P, Chowdhury AA, Fukuyama M, Kakuda S, Carvalho RM, Sano H. The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength. J Dent 2016; 47: 63-70.
  17. Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Re D, Gagliani M, Tanaka T, et al. The effect of the air-blowing step on the technique sensitivity of four different adhesive systems. J Dent 2006; 34(3): 237-244.
  18. De Munck J, Arita A, Shirai K, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, et al. Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9(4).
  19. Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability—A systematic review. Mater 2019; 12(5): 790.
  20. Fehrenbach J, Isolan CP, Münchow EA. Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater 2021; 37(10): 1463-1485.
  21. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent 2020; 22(1): 7-34.
  22. Mohenski D, Vrebac M, Sever EK, Grego T, Goršeta K, Ivanišević A. Effects of Ionizing Radiation on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Materials to Dentin. J Compos Sci 2024; 8(7): 261.
  23. Yingchao Z, Haihuan G, Dan F, Tengjiaozi F, Danfeng C, Zuosen S, et al. New strategy for overcoming microleakage: an elastic layer for dental caries restoration. J Mater Chem B 2015; 3(21): 4401-4405.
  24. Ahmed MH, Yoshihara K, Mercelis B, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24: 2837-2851. 25. Kitahara S, Shimizu S, Takagaki T, Inokoshi M, Abdou A, Burrow MF, et al. Dentin Bonding Durability of Four Different Recently Introduced Self-Etch Adhesives. Mater 2024; 17(17): 4296.